Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 689

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Social, environmental and sustainability reporting and organisational value creation?: Whose value? Whose creation?

Gray, Rob·2006·Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal
DOI 10.1108/09513570610709872
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Purpose: The objective of this essay is to examine the extent to which social, environmental and sustainability accounting and reporting (SEA) can or should contribute to shareholder value and, correspondingly, to consider the challenge that SEA can offer to the conventional views of “value” that underpin traditional financial accounting. The essay is then used as a vehicle to introduce some relatively new data about sustainable development that has implications for our consideration of “value”. Design/methodology/approach: Although drawing from a wide range of secondary contextual data, the paper is primarily argumentative and seeks to challenge a number of implicit assumptions within both conventional and more “critical” accounting. Findings: Substantive social and environmental reporting and, especially, high quality reporting on (un)sustainability will demonstrate that modern international financial capitalism and the principle organs which support it are essentially designed to maximise environmental destruction and the erosion of any realistic notion of social justice. This paper seeks to demonstrate this contention and the powerful and fundamental implications that this has for conventional financial reporting and for the superficial and cosmetic adjustments to that reporting through “new models of organisational reporting”. Research limitations/implications: The paper questions whether any research which is not either cognisant of or directed towards sustainability and/or sustainable development makes any real sense in the context of current data about the planet. More especially, the paper asks whether any notion of “value” employed in the accounting (and wider) literature can be anything other than self‐delusional and empty if it ignores a crucial wider context. Originality/value: Apart from taking debates about “value” and, especially “shareholder value” into another dimension, the paper is one of the first (at least in accounting as far as I am aware) to formally introduce and confront data about planetary sustainability.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/09513570610709872

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 59

  1. Adams, C. (2004), “The ethical, social and environmental reporting‐performance portrayal gap”, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 17 No. 5, pp. 731‐757. · DOI · Paper page
  2. Bailey, D., Harte, G. and Sugden, R. (1994), Making Transnationals Accountable: A Significant Step for Britain, Routledge, London. · doi:10.4324/9780203313626
  3. Baxter, T., Bebbington, J. and Cutteridge, D. (2004), “Sustainability assessment model: modelling economic, resource, environmental and social flows of a project”, in Henriques, A. and Richardson, J. (Eds), The Triple Bottom Line: Does it all Add Up?, Earthscan, London, pp. 113‐20.
  4. Bebbington, K.J. and Gray, R.H. (2001), “An account of sustainability: failure, success and a reconception”, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, Vol. 12 No. 5, pp. 557‐87. · DOI · Paper page
  5. Bebbington, K.J. and Tan, J. (1997), “Accounting for sustainability”, Chartered Accountants Journal (NZ), February, pp. 37‐40.
  6. Bebbington, K.J., Gray, R.H., Thomson, I. and Walters, D. (1994), “Accountants attitudes and environmentally sensitive accounting”, Accounting and Business Research, No. 94, Spring, pp. 51‐75. · DOI · Paper page
  7. Benston, G.J. (1982a), “Accounting and corporate accountability”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 7 No. 2, pp. 87‐105. · DOI · Paper page
  8. Benston, G.J. (1982b), “An analysis of the role of accounting standards for enhancing corporate governance and social responsibility”, Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, Vol. 1 No. 1, pp. 5‐18. · DOI
  9. Chwastiak, M. (1996), “The wrong stuff: The Accounting Review's forum for defense clients”, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, Vol. 7 No. 4, pp. 365‐81. · doi:10.1006/cpac.1996.0040
  10. Cooper, C. (1992), “The non and nom of accounting for (M)other Nature”, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 5 No. 3, pp. 16‐39. · DOI · Paper page
  11. Cooper, C., Taylor, P., Smith, N. and Catchpowle, L. (2005), “A discussion of the political potential of social accounting”, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, Vol. 16, pp. 951‐74. · DOI · Paper page
  12. Dey, C. (2002), “The use of critical ethnography as an active research methodology”, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 15 No. 1, pp. 106‐21. · DOI
  13. Dey, C., Evans, R. and Gray, R.H. (1995), “Towards social information systems and bookkeeping: a note on developing the mechanisms for social accounting and audit”, Journal of Applied Accounting Research, Vol. 2 No. 3.
  14. Donaldson, J. (1988), Key Issues in Business Ethics, Academic Press, London.
  15. Eden, S. (1996), Environmental Issues and Business: Implications of a Changing Agenda, John Wiley, Chichester.
  16. Elkington, J. (2001), The Chrysalis Economy: How Citizen CEOs and Corporations Can Fuse Values and Value Creation, Capstone Publishing, Oxford.
  17. Gambling, T. (1985), “The accountants' guide to the galaxy, including the profession at the end of the universe”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 10 No. 4, pp. 415‐25. · DOI
  18. Gray, R.H. (1992), “Accounting and environmentalism: an exploration of the challenge of gently accounting for accountability, transparency and sustainability”, Accounting Organisations and Society, Vol. 17 No. 5, pp. 399‐426. · DOI · Paper page
  19. Gray, R.H. (2002a), “The social accounting project and accounting organizations and society: privileging engagement, imaginings, new accountings and pragmatism over critique”, Accounting Organizations and Society, Vol. 27 No. 7, pp. 687‐708. · DOI · Paper page
  20. Gray, R.H. (2002b), “Of messiness, systems and sustainability: towards a more social and environmental finance and accounting”, British Accounting Review, Vol. 34 No. 4, pp. 357‐86. · DOI
  21. Gray, R.H. and Bebbington, K.J. (2000), “Environmental accounting, managerialism and sustainability: is the planet safe in the hands of business and accounting?”, Advances in Environmental Accounting and Management, Vol. 1, pp. 1‐4428. · DOI · Paper page
  22. Gray, R.H. and Bebbington, K.J. (2001), Accounting for the Environment, 2nd ed., Sage, London. · DOI · Paper page
  23. Gray, R.H. and Milne, M. (2004), “Towards reporting on the triple bottom line: mirages, methods and myths”, in Henriques, A. and Richardson, J. (Eds), The Triple Bottom Line: Does it all Add Up?, Earthscan, London, pp. 70‐80.
  24. Gray, R.H., Bebbington, K.J. and McPhail, K. (1994), “Teaching ethics and the ethics of accounting teaching: educating for immorality and a case for social and environmental accounting education”, Accounting Education, Vol. 3 No. 1, pp. 51‐75. · DOI · Paper page
  25. Gray, R.H., Owen, D.L. and Adams, C. (1996), Accounting and Accountability: Changes and Challenges in Corporate Social and Environmental Reporting, Prentice Hall, London.
  26. Gray, R.H., Bebbington, K.J., Walters, D. and Thomson, I. (1995), “The greening of enterprise: an exploration of the (non) role of environmental accounting and environmental accountants in organisational change”, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, Vol. 6 No. 3, pp. 211‐39. · DOI · Paper page
  27. Gray, R.H., Javad, M., Power, D.M. and Sinclair, C.D. (2001), “Social and environmental disclosure and corporate characteristics: a research note and extension”, Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, Vol. 28 Nos 3/4, pp. 327‐56. · DOI · Paper page
  28. Gray, R.H., Dey, C., Owen, D., Evans, R. and Zadek, S. (1997), “Struggling with the praxis of social accounting: stakeholders, accountability, audits and procedures”, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 10 No. 3, pp. 325‐64. · DOI · Paper page
  29. Hayek, F.A. (1960), The Constitution of Liberty, Routledge, London.
  30. Hayek, F.A. (1982), Law, Legislation and Liberty, Vol. 3, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.
  31. Hines, R. (1984), “The implications of stock market reaction (non‐reaction) for financial accounting standard setting”, Accounting and Business Research, Vol. 15 No. 57, pp. 3‐14. · doi:10.1080/00014788.1984.9729237
  32. Hines, R.D. (1988), “Financial accounting: in communicating reality, we construct reality”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 13 No. 3, pp. 251‐61. · DOI · Paper page
  33. Hirst, P. and Thompson, G. (1996), Globalization in Question, Polity, Cambridge.
  34. Jacobs, M. (1991), The Green Economy: Environment, Sustainable Development and the Politics of the Future, Pluto Press, London.
  35. Jacobson, R. (1991), “Economic efficiency and the quality of life”, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 10, pp. 201‐9. · doi:10.1007/bf00383157
  36. Lehman, G. (2001), “Reclaiming the public sphere: problems and prospects for corporate social and environmental accounting”, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, Vol. 12 No. 6, pp. 713‐33. · doi:10.1006/cpac.2001.0476
  37. Mouck, T. (1994), “Corporate accountability and Rorty's utopian liberalisim”, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 7 No. 1, pp. 6‐30. · DOI
  38. Murray, A., Sinclair, D., Power, D. and Gray, R. (2006), “Do financial markets care about social and environmental disclosure? Further evidence and exploration from the UK”, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 19 No. 2, pp. 228‐55. · DOI · Paper page
  39. Neu, D., Warsame, H. and Pedwell, K. (1998), “Managing public impressions: environmental disclosures in annual reports”, Accounting Organizations and Society, Vol. 23 No. 3, pp. 265‐82. · DOI · Paper page
  40. Owen, D.L., Swift, T., Bowerman, M. and Humphreys, C. (2000), “The new social audits: accountability, managerial capture or the agenda of social champions?”, European Accounting Review, Vol. 9 No. 1, pp. 81‐98. · DOI · Paper page
  41. Page, M. and Spira, L. (1999), “The conceptual underwear of financial reporting”, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability, Vol. 12 No. 4, pp. 489‐501. · doi:10.1108/09513579910283521
  42. Parkinson, J. (2003), “Disclosure and corporate social and environmental performance: competitiveness and enterprise in a broader social frame”, Journal of Corporate Law Studies, Vol. 3 No. 1, pp. 3‐39. · DOI
  43. Power, M. (1997), “Expertise and the construction of relevance: accountants and the environmental audit”, Accounting Organizations and Society, Vol. 22 No. 2, pp. 123‐46. · DOI · Paper page
  44. Puxty, A., Sikka, P. and Willmott, H. (1997), “Mediating interests: the accountancy bodies' responses to the McFarlane Report”, Accounting and Business Research, Vol. 27 No. 4, pp. 323‐40. · doi:10.1080/00014788.1997.9729558
  45. Rawls, J. (1972), A Theory of Justice, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  46. Richardson, A.J., Welker, M. and Hutchinson, I.R. (1999), “Managing capital market reactions to social responsibility”, International Journal of Management Reviews, Vol. 1 No. 1, pp. 17‐43. · DOI · Paper page
  47. Robson, K. (1992), “Accounting numbers as ‘inscription’: action at a distance and the development of accounting”, Accounting, Organizations and Society, Vol. 17 No. 7, pp. 685‐708. · DOI · Paper page
  48. Roslender, R. and Fincham, R. (2004), “Intellectual capital: who counts, controls?”, Accounting and the Public Interest, Vol. 4 No. 1 (e‐journal). · DOI
  49. Schwartz, P. and Gibb, B. (1999), When Good Companies Do Bad Things: Responsibility and Risk in an Age of Globalization, John Wiley, New York, NY.
  50. Solomons, D. (1974), “Corporate social performance – a new dimension in accounting reports?”, in Edey, H. and Yamey, B.S. (Eds), Debits, Credits, Finance and Profits, Sweet and Maxwell, London, pp. 131‐41.
  51. Sunstein, C.R. (1997), Free Markets and Social Justice, Oxford University Press, New York, NY. · DOI
  52. Thielemann, U. (2000), “A brief theory of the market – ethically focused”, International Journal of Social Economics, Vol. 27 No. 1, pp. 6‐31. · doi:10.1108/03068290010306435
  53. Tinker, A.M. (1984a), “Theories of the state and the state of accounting: economic reductionism and political voluntarism in accounting regulation theory”, Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, Vol. 3, Fall, pp. 55‐74. · DOI
  54. Tinker, A.M. (Ed.) (1984b), Social Accounting for Corporations, MUP, Manchester.
  55. Tinker, A.M. (1985), Paper Prophets: A Social Critique of Accounting, Holt Saunders, Eastbourne.
  56. Tinker, T. and Gray, R. (2003), “Beyond a critique of pure reason: from policy to politics to praxis in environmental and social research”, Accounting Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 16 No. 5, pp. 727‐61. · DOI
  57. Tinker, T., Lehman, C. and Neimark, M. (1991), “Corporate social reporting: falling down the hole in the middle of the road”, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 4 No. 1, pp. 28‐54. · DOI · Paper page
  58. Van Dieran, W. (1995), Taking Nature into Account: A Report to the Club of Rome, Springer‐Verlag, New York, NY.
  59. Walker, M. (2004), “Recovering accounting as a worthy endeavour”, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, Vol. 15 Nos 4/5, pp. 519‐28. · doi:10.1016/s1045-2354(03)00042-x

Cited by

See all 689

Metadata

Authors
Gray, R.
Venue
Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2006-11-01
Volume
19
Issue
6
Pages
793-819
ISSN
0951-3574 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1108/09513570610709872
OpenAlex
W1577773346
Cited by
689
References
1
FWCI
58.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.emerald.com/insight/site-policies (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Social, environmental and sustainability reporting and organisational value creation?: Whose value? Whose creation? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/09513570610709872
The paper
Gray, R. (2006). Social, environmental and sustainability reporting and organisational value creation?: Whose value? Whose creation? Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513570610709872

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.