The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Public sector to public services: 20 years of “contextual” accounting research
Open accessAbstract
Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to review and critique the field of public sector accounting research. Many nation states deliver essential public services. In recent times, many of these nations have been involved in programmes of “modernisation”, which, in part, means that these public services now are significantly managed, delivered and governed by private and third sector organisations. Design/methodology/approach: The paper employs a literature‐based analysis and critique of public sector accounting articles published in the selected journals from 1992 to 2006. From this, a descriptive meta‐analysis of the characteristics of the research will be discussed. Finally, a conceptual analysis of the selected literature will be used to evaluate the field and address a possible future research agenda. Findings: The descriptive analysis highlights that among the research papers reviewed several interesting patterns emerged concerning public service research. Also, the dominance of Australasia and UK research was noted. The extent of research in different levels of government/jurisdiction indicated that the majority of research was organisationally based. Finally, when the various functional types of accounting are considered, management accounting remained the most researched area of interest. Research limitations/implications: The paper only considered research within eight selected journals and over the period 1992 to 2006. Therefore, for instance, US mainstream public sector accounting research has not been reviewed. Originality/value: The main implications of the paper are that “contextual” public service accounting research has a strong tradition and, through the process of reflection and critique of the body of work, several important insights are provided in order to highlight areas for further research and policy development.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Reflections and projections: A decade of Intellectual Capital Accounting Research
Guthrie, J., Ricceri, F., & Dumay, J. (2012) · The British Accounting Review · doi:10.1016/j.bar.2012.03.004 · Cited by 698
Self-citationBartocci, L., Grossi, G., Mauro, S. G., & Ebdon, C. (2023) · International Review of Administrative Sciences · doi:10.1177/00208523221078938 · Cited by 145
The future of public sector accounting research. A polyphonic debate
Grossi, G., Steccolini, I., Adhikari, P., Brown, J., Christensen, M., Cordery, C., Ferry, L., Lassou, P., McDonald III, B., Raudla, R., et al. (2023) · Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management · doi:10.1108/qram-09-2022-0135 · Cited by 82
Minoja, M., & Romano, G. (2021) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123213 · Cited by 43
Accountability and Reporting for Sustainability and Public Value: Challenges in the Public Sector
Gherardi, L., Linsalata, A. M., Gagliardo, E. D., & Orelli, R. L. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su13031097 · Cited by 24
Metadata
- Authors
- Broadbent, J., & Guthrie, J.
- Venue
- Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2008-02-15
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 129-169
- ISSN
- 0951-3574 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2020551126
- Cited by
- 521
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 42.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Public sector to public services: 20 years of “contextual” accounting research. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/09513570810854383
- The paper
- Broadbent, J., & Guthrie, J. (2008). Public sector to public services: 20 years of “contextual” accounting research. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513570810854383
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.