Cited by 82Accounting and Organizational ManagementAccounting Theory and Financial ReportingPublic Policy and Administration Research

The future of public sector accounting research. A polyphonic debate

Open access
Grossi, Giuseppe, Steccolini, Ileana, Adhikari, Pawan, Brown, Judy, Christensen, Mark, Cordery, Carolyn, Ferry, Laurence, Lassou, Philippe +4 more·2023·Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this polyphonic paper is to report on interdisciplinary discussions on the state-of-the-art and future of public sector accounting research (PSAR). The authors hope to enliven the debates of the past and future developments in terms of context, themes, theories, methods and impacts in the field of PSAR by the exchanges they include here. Design/methodology/approach: This polyphonic paper adopts an interdisciplinary approach. It brings into conversation ideas, views and approaches of several scholars on the actual and future developments of PSAR in various contexts, and explores potential implications. Findings: This paper has brought together scholars from a plurality of disciplines, research methods and geographical areas, showing at the same time several points of convergence on important future themes (such as accounting as a mean for public, accounting, hybridity and value pluralism) and enabling conditions (accounting capabilities, profession and digitalisation) for PSA scholarship and practice, and the richness of looking at them from a plurality of perspectives. Research limitations/implications: Exploring these past and future developments opens up the potential for interesting theoretical insights. A much greater theoretical and practical reconsideration of PSAR will be fostered by the exchanges included here. Originality/value: In setting out a future research agenda, this paper fosters theoretical and methodological pluralism in the interdisciplinary research community interested in PSAR in various contexts. The discussion perspectives presented in this paper constitute not only a basis for further research in this relevant accounting area on the role, status and developments of PSAR but also creative potential for practitioners to be more reflective on their practices and also intended and united outcomes of such practices.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/qram-09-2022-0135

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Social justice has frequently been overlooked in traditional budgeting processes, which have typically stressed efficiency and effectiveness over equity.

    “Within the broader public budgeting literature, social justice has frequently been overlooked in traditional budgeting processes, which have typically stressed efficiency and effectiveness over equity (Grossi et al. 2023;McDonald et al. 2022).”

    From Participatory Budgeting for Social Equity: A Comparative Analysis (2025) · cites this paper as Grossi et al. 2023

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Grossi, G., Steccolini, I., Adhikari, P., Brown, J., Christensen, M., Cordery, C., Ferry, L., Lassou, P., McDonald III, B., Raudla, R., Sicilia, M., & Vinnari, E.
Affiliations
  • Kozminski University (PL)
  • University of Essex (GB)
  • Victoria University (AU)
  • École Supérieure des Sciences Économiques et Commerciales (FR)
  • Aston University (GB)
  • Durham University (GB)
  • University of Guelph (CA)
  • Tallinn University of Technology (EE)
  • University of Bergamo (IT)
  • University of Tampere (FI)
Corresponding author
Grossi, Giuseppe
Venue
Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2023-01-03
Volume
20
Issue
1
Pages
1-37
ISSN
1176-6093 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4313365849
Cited by
82
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 14
FWCI
16.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Durham Research Online (Durham University) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Aisberg (University of Bergamo) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Durham Research Online (Durham University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Open Access at Essex (University of Essex) (submittedVersion)
  • Tampere University Institutional Repository (Tampere University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Accounting and Organizational Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Accounting Theory and Financial Reporting
  • Social Sciences › Public Administration › Public Policy and Administration Research
Keywords
future research agenda, value pluralism, accounting profession, digitalization, interdisciplinary research, accounting theory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review