Cited by 288Organizational Change and LeadershipOrganizational Management and ChangeAppreciative Inquiry and Organizational Change

The “death valley” of change

Elrod, P. David, Tippett, Donald D.·2002·Journal of Organizational Change Management

Abstract

This paper provides an overview of the current body of knowledge surrounding the human response to change and transition. Models of the change process, as perceived by diverse and seemingly unrelated disciplines, are identified, compared, and contrasted by tracing the evolution of these models from seminal works through contemporary research. Surprisingly, a majority of the models studied were found to share two important characteristics: they follow Lewin’s 1952 three‐phase model of change; and they describe a degradation of capabilities in the intermediate stages of the change process. In a practical example, the authors explain their experimental verification of the change models’ applicability to an organizational change involving the introduction of teams. The interrelationship of developmental and change models is discussed. Finally, the importance to leaders and managers of developing an understanding of the current state‐of‐the‐art in human response to change and transition is discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/09534810210429309

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Authors
Elrod, P. D., & Tippett, D. D.
Affiliations
University of Alabama in Huntsville (US)
Venue
Journal of Organizational Change Management
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2002-06-01
Volume
15
Issue
3
Pages
273-291
ISSN
0953-4814 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2090935069
Cited by
288
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 9
FWCI
7.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Organizational Change Management (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Organizational Change and Leadership
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Organizational Management and Change
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Appreciative Inquiry and Organizational Change
Keywords
organizational change, change models, transition, developmental model, leadership, change management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review