The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Managing the Environmental Change Process: Barriers and Opportunities
Abstract
Organizations face formidable obstacles to the institutionalization of environmental management programmes. Longitudinal studies show that companies face two major types of barriers to change: industry‐specific barriers, which affect all organizations in a line of business; and organizational barriers, which are not specific to environmental problems, but may impede a company′s capacity to deal with any form of change. Evidence shows that these barriers can be overcome through effective environmental management programmes. Argues that by overcoming these barriers, organizations can move along an environmental performance curve, consisting of phases involving adjustment to regulatory and market realities; adaptation and anticipation of emerging issues; and innovation in achieving economically and environmentally sustainable performance through change programmes involving internal and external elements.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Verhulst, E., & Lambrechts, W. (2015) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.09.049 · Cited by 321
Barriers to implementing reverse logistics in South Australian construction organisations
Chileshe, N., Rameezdeen, R., Hosseini, M. R., & Lehmann, S. (2015) · Supply Chain Management: An International Journal · doi:10.1108/scm-10-2014-0325 · Cited by 121
Metadata
- Authors
- Post, J. E., & Altma, B. W.
- Venue
- Journal of Organizational Change Management
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 1994-08-01
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 64-81
- ISSN
- 0953-4814 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2034305608
- Cited by
- 363
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.