The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Employees’ reaction to the change to work teams: The influence of “anticipatory” injustice
Abstract
This paper reports the findings of a study regarding the reactions of 492 line‐level employees from two Fortune 500 organizations in response to the organizations’ recent implementation of self‐managing work teams (SMWTs). As predicted, we found that anticipatory injustice was significantly positively related to change‐resistance and turnover intentions; and significantly negatively related to employees’ commitment; and that procedural justice can mitigate the latter relationships. Implications for managing change are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Adams, J. S. (1965) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60108-2 · Cited by 10,818
Tightening the Iron Cage: Concertive Control in Self-Managing Teams
Barker, J. R. (1993) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393374 · Cited by 2,305
Cited by
BEYOND SELF-MANAGEMENT: ANTECEDENTS AND CONSEQUENCES OF TEAM EMPOWERMENT.
Kirkman, B. L., & Rosen, B. (1999) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/256874 · Cited by 2,110
Self-citationResistance to Change: The Rest of the Story
Ford, J. D., Ford, L. W., & D'Amelio, A. (2008) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2008.31193235 · Cited by 1,084
Trust, Individualism and job characteristics as predictors of employee preference for teamwork
Kiffin-Petersen, S., & Cordery, J. (2003) · The International Journal of Human Resource Management · doi:10.1080/09585190210158538 · Cited by 198
Ford, J. K., Lauricella, T. K., Van Fossen, J. A., & Riley, S. J. (2021) · The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science · doi:10.1177/0021886320907423 · Cited by 26
Metadata
- Authors
- Shapiro, D. L., & Kirkman, B. L.
- Venue
- Journal of Organizational Change Management
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 1999-02-01
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 51-67
- ISSN
- 0953-4814 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1502283998
- Cited by
- 165
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 6.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Employees’ reaction to the change to work teams: The influence of “anticipatory” injustice. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/09534819910255315
- The paper
- Shapiro, D. L., & Kirkman, B. L. (1999). Employees’ reaction to the change to work teams: The influence of “anticipatory” injustice. Journal of Organizational Change Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/09534819910255315
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
