Cited by 2,110Team Dynamics and PerformanceJob Satisfaction and Organizational BehaviorManagement and Organizational Practices

BEYOND SELF-MANAGEMENT: ANTECEDENTS AND CONSEQUENCES OF TEAM EMPOWERMENT.

Kirkman, B. L., Rosen, B.·1999·Academy of Management Journal

Abstract

We examined the antecedents, consequences, and mediational role of team empowerment using 111 work teams in four organizations. The results indicated that the actions of external leaders, the production/service responsibilities given to teams, team-based human resources policies, and the social structure of teams all worked to enhance employee team empowerment experiences. More empowered teams were also more productive and proactive than less empowered teams and had higher levels of customer service, job satisfaction, and organizational and team commitment.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/256874

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Empowering leadership is theorised to build trust through positive exchange behaviours and leader vulnerability/confidence.

    “Empowering behaviours such as providing discretion and latitude over decision making constitute positive exchange behaviours. Furthermore, empowering ones followers makes a leader vulnerable and demonstrates confidence; key features of trust (Zhang & Zhou, 2014).”

    From A meta-analysis of the role of trust in the leadership- performance relationship (2021) · cites this paper as Kirkman & Rosen, (1999)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kirkman, B. L., & Rosen, B.
Affiliations
  • University of North Carolina at Greensboro (US)
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Venue
Academy of Management Journal
Published
1999-02-01
Volume
42
Issue
1
Pages
58-74
ISSN
  • 0001-4273 (ISSN-L)
  • 1948-0989
OpenAlex
W1978374798
Cited by
2,110
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 80 · 2025: 80 · 2024: 129 · 2023: 119 · 2022: 111 · 2021: 127 · 2020: 121 · 2019: 93 · 2018: 105 · 2017: 101 · 2016: 86 · 2015: 85 · 2014: 108 · 2013: 92 · 2012: 91
FWCI
37.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Academy of Management Journal (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Team Dynamics and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Management and Organizational Practices
Keywords
team empowerment, team productivity, proactive behavior, customer service, job satisfaction, organizational commitment, team commitment, external leadership, self-management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review