The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Lean production, six sigma quality, TQM and company culture
Abstract
Purpose: The authors analyze the principles and results of lean production and compare the lean production philosophy with the six sigma quality process and the principles of total quality management (TQM). At the end of the paper, it is discussed how to build the necessary company culture for having success with these principles/management philosophies. Design/methodology/approach: Literature search and comparative analysis complemented with a Danish case on wastage in a core process. Findings: It is shown that the lean production philosophy and the six sigma steps are essentially the same and both have developed from the same root – the Japanese TQM practices. The improvement process from six sigma, the DMAIC process, can be regarded as a short version of the Quality Story, which was developed in Japan in the 1960s as a standard for QC‐circle presentations. We conclude that the roadmaps of lean production and six sigma quality are examples of new alternative TQM roadmaps. We also conclude that especially with lean production and six sigma quality there seems to be too much focus on training people intools and techniques and at the same time too little focus on understanding the human factor, i.e. how to build the right company culture. Originality/value: The detailed and historical analysis of six sigma quality, lean production and TQM combined with a focus on the human factor and the needed corporate culture.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Lean Thinking—Banish Waste and Create Wealth in your Corporation
Womack, J. P., & Jones, D. T. (1997) · Journal of the Operational Research Society · doi:10.1057/palgrave.jors.2600967 · Cited by 2,122
Cited by
Lean manufacturing: literature review and research issues
Bhamu, J., & Singh Sangwan, K. (2014) · International Journal of Operations & Production Management · doi:10.1108/ijopm-08-2012-0315 · Cited by 983
Cherrafi, A., Elfezazi, S., Chiarini, A., Mokhlis, A., & Benhida, K. (2016) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.08.101 · Cited by 502
Four decades of lean: a systematic literature review
Stone, K. B. (2012) · International Journal of Lean Six Sigma · doi:10.1108/20401461211243702 · Cited by 393
Measuring lean initiatives in health care services: issues and findings
Kollberg, B., Dahlgaard, J. J., & Brehmer, P. (2006) · International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management · doi:10.1108/17410400710717064 · Cited by 364
Self-citationDing, L., Zhou, Y., & Akinci, B. (2014) · Automation in Construction · doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2014.04.009 · Cited by 330
Metadata
- Authors
- Dahlgaard, J. J., & Mi Dahlgaard‐Park, S.
- Venue
- The TQM Magazine
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2006-05-01
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 263-281
- ISSN
- 0954-478X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2168229645
- Cited by
- 692
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 30.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Lean production, six sigma quality, TQM and company culture. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/09544780610659998
- The paper
- Dahlgaard, J. J., & Mi Dahlgaard‐Park, S. (2006). Lean production, six sigma quality, TQM and company culture. The TQM Magazine. https://doi.org/10.1108/09544780610659998
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.