Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 364

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Measuring lean initiatives in health care services: issues and findings

Kollberg, Beata, Dahlgaard, Jens J., Brehmer, Per‐Olaf·2006·International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management

Abstract

Abstract Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to discuss how a performance measurement system called "the flow model" is designed to measure changes towards lean thinking in health care services. Design/methodology/approach – The paper integrates literature from the health care sector and the lean production movement in order to understand whether lean thinking is applicable in healthcare and thereby identify key performance indicators that measure changes towards lean thinking in health care. The flow model is discussed in relation to this measurement framework. Findings – The paper finds that lean thinking is applicable in health care settings, and that the flow model is a suitable tool for following up these initiatives. However, it is argued that the flow model needs to be balanced with other measurements in order to receive a complete picture of lean performance. Research limitations/implications – The paper shows that the framework of measurements may be used in empirical research of assessing changes towards lean thinking in health care settings. Practical implications – The paper shows that health care practitioners may use the findings to develop measurements of the outcome of lean initiatives on existing care processes. Originality/value – The paper shows analysis and discussion of the application of an industrial concept – Lean Production – in health care services.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/17410400710717064

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 15 references

Cited by

See all 364

Metadata

Authors
Kollberg, B., Dahlgaard, J. J., & Brehmer, P.
Venue
International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2006-12-12
Volume
56
Issue
1
Pages
7-24
ISSN
  • 0043-8022 (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-0401
OpenAlex
W2072183866
Cited by
364
References
15
FWCI
15.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Measuring lean initiatives in health care services: issues and findings. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/17410400710717064
The paper
Kollberg, B., Dahlgaard, J. J., & Brehmer, P. (2006). Measuring lean initiatives in health care services: issues and findings. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/17410400710717064

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.