Cited by 517Consumer Retail Behavior StudiesConsumer Market Behavior and PricingCustomer Service Quality and Loyalty

Decomposing the value of department store shopping into utilitarian, hedonic and social dimensions: Evidence from Finland

Rintamäki, Timo, Kanto, Antti, Kuusela, Hannu, Spence, Mark T.·2006·International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to decompose total customer value as perceived by department store shoppers into utilitarian, hedonic and social dimensions, and empirically test this conceptualization in a Finnish department store shopping context. Design/methodology/approach Data were collected by a questionnaire administered over three days at a department store that generates the second largest turnover in Finland. A total of 364 shoppers completed the questionnaire. Findings Empirical evidence supports our tripartite conceptualization of total customer value. In particular, social value is an independent construct. Further, social value varies by day‐of‐week, with a significant increase on Saturday (versus weekdays) when the store is more crowded, whereas no such differences in utilitarian and hedonic values were detected. Originality/value The principal contribution is a tripartite conceptualization of total customer value that incorporates utilitarian, social and hedonic value dimensions in a department store shopping context. Individually these dimensions are all well rooted in streams of consumer behavior literature, albeit mostly at the product or brand, not the store, level. Increasing our understanding of these softer aspects of shopping, particularly the social dimension, is important because they represent possible differentiating factors in the highly competitive and often commoditized retail markets.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/09590550610642792

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rintamäki, T., Kanto, A., Kuusela, H., & Spence, M. T.
Affiliations
  • Tampere University (FI)
  • Aalto University (FI)
  • Bond University (AU)
Venue
International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2006-01-01
Volume
34
Issue
1
Pages
6-24
ISSN
0959-0552 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1556234621
Cited by
517
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 48 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 40 · 2017: 36 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 28 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 24
FWCI
19.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management (publishedVersion)
  • Bond University Research Portal (Bond University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Retail Behavior Studies
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Customer Service Quality and Loyalty
Keywords
utilitarian value, hedonic value, social values, day-of-the-week effect, consumer behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review