Decomposing the value of department store shopping into utilitarian, hedonic and social dimensions: Evidence from Finland
Abstract
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to decompose total customer value as perceived by department store shoppers into utilitarian, hedonic and social dimensions, and empirically test this conceptualization in a Finnish department store shopping context. Design/methodology/approach Data were collected by a questionnaire administered over three days at a department store that generates the second largest turnover in Finland. A total of 364 shoppers completed the questionnaire. Findings Empirical evidence supports our tripartite conceptualization of total customer value. In particular, social value is an independent construct. Further, social value varies by day‐of‐week, with a significant increase on Saturday (versus weekdays) when the store is more crowded, whereas no such differences in utilitarian and hedonic values were detected. Originality/value The principal contribution is a tripartite conceptualization of total customer value that incorporates utilitarian, social and hedonic value dimensions in a department store shopping context. Individually these dimensions are all well rooted in streams of consumer behavior literature, albeit mostly at the product or brand, not the store, level. Increasing our understanding of these softer aspects of shopping, particularly the social dimension, is important because they represent possible differentiating factors in the highly competitive and often commoditized retail markets.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In social commerce, people pursue social values such as interaction with others and self-fulfillment.
“in the context of social commerce, people are not only interested in the satisfaction of utilitarian and hedonic values, such as convenience and enjoyment, but also start to pursue social values, such as interaction with others and self-fulfillment [16,17].”
From Influence of Perceived Value on Consumers’ Continuous Purchase Intention in Live-Streaming E-Commerce—Mediated by Consumer Trust (2023) · cites this paper as [17]
Cites
Possessions and the Extended Self
Belk, R. W. (1988) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/209154 · Cited by 9,064 · see citing works
Servicescapes: The Impact of Physical Surroundings on Customers and Employees
Bitner, M. J. (1992) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.2307/1252042 · Cited by 7,271 · see citing works
Work and/or Fun: Measuring Hedonic and Utilitarian Shopping Value
Babin, B. J., Darden, W. R., & Griffin, M. (1994) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/209376 · Cited by 6,020 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Role of Live Streaming in Building Consumer Trust and Engagement with Social Commerce Sellers
Wongkitrungrueng, A., & Assarut, N. (2020) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.08.032 · Cited by 1,477 · see citing works
Chiu, C., Wang, E. T. G., Fang, Y., & Huang, H. (2014) · Information Systems Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2575.2012.00407.x · Cited by 1,332 · see citing works
The influence of perceived value on purchase intention in social commerce context
Gan, C., & Wang, W. (2017) · Internet Research · doi:10.1108/intr-06-2016-0164 · Cited by 442 · see citing works
Chen, P.-T., & Hu, H.-H. (2010) · International Journal of Hospitality Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijhm.2009.09.006 · Cited by 269 · see citing works
Wu, Y., & Huang, H. (2023) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su15054432 · Cited by 201 · see citing works
Yum, K., & Kim, J. (2024) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app14135763 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
How Do Fresh Live Broadcast Impact Consumers’ Purchase Intention? Based on the SOR Theory
Song, Z., Liu, C., & Shi, R. (2022) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su142114382 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Zhang, Q., Wang, Y., & Ariffin, S. K. (2024) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0296339 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
The thrill of victory: women and sport shopping.
O’Donnell, K. A., Strebel, J., & Mortimer, G. (2016) · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services · doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2015.10.005 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
- Authors
- Rintamäki, T., Kanto, A., Kuusela, H., & Spence, M. T.
- Affiliations
- Tampere University (FI)
- Aalto University (FI)
- Bond University (AU)
- Venue
- International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2006-01-01
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 6-24
- ISSN
- 0959-0552 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1556234621
- Cited by
- 517
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 48 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 40 · 2017: 36 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 28 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 24
- FWCI
- 19.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management (publishedVersion)
- Bond University Research Portal (Bond University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Retail Behavior Studies
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Customer Service Quality and Loyalty
- Keywords
- utilitarian value, hedonic value, social values, day-of-the-week effect, consumer behavior
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review