The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Odd girl out: an individual differences perspective on women in the IT profession
Abstract
This paper develops a theoretical perspective on gender and information technology (IT) by examining socio‐cultural influences on women who are members of the information technology profession in Australia and New Zealand. In‐depth interviews with both practitioners and academics give evidence of a range of socio‐cultural influences on the professional development and working lives of women IT professionals. The paper rejects the essentialist view of women and their relationship to IT that has been put forth in the information systems literature arguing, instead, the primacy of societal and structural influences. The particular contribution of this paper is a theoretical perspective of individual differences which is presented to characterize the way individual women respond in a range of specific ways to the interplay between individual characteristics and environmental influences. This perspective contributes to a better understanding of women’s involvement in the IT sector and suggests areas for proactive policy response.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The measurement of psychological androgyny
Bem, S. L. (1974) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0036215 · Cited by 8,522
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., & Ackerman, P. L. (2000) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1006/obhd.2000.2896 · Cited by 1,237
Cited by
Morris, M. G., Venkatesh, V., & Ackerman, P. L. (2005) · IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management · doi:10.1109/tem.2004.839967 · Cited by 604
Perceived versus actual computer-email-web fluency
Bunz, U., Curry, C., & Voon, W. (2007) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2006.03.008 · Cited by 106
Metadata
- Authors
- Trauth, E. M.
- Venue
- Information Technology & People
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2002-06-01
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 98-118
- ISSN
- 0959-3845 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2000625389
- Cited by
- 362
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 35.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Odd girl out: an individual differences perspective on women in the IT profession. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/09593840210430552
- The paper
- Trauth, E. M. (2002). Odd girl out: an individual differences perspective on women in the IT profession. Information Technology & People. https://doi.org/10.1108/09593840210430552
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.