The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Implementing mixed methods research in supply chain management
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to describe how to implement mixed methods research in supply chain management. Design/methodology/approach: A review of past journal analyses on research methods used in supply chain management‐related disciplines is conducted to demonstrate the low incidence of mixed methods research in supply chain management. Drawing from literature on multiple and mixed methods research, the paper provides guidelines for designing and reporting such studies. Findings: Knowledge development in logistics and supply chain management relies primarily on single‐method quantitative research designs, while mixed methods approaches are rarely used. Thus, there is a significant opportunity to advance the discipline through the rigorous application of mixed methods research. Research limitations/implications: Supply chain management phenomena are complex and dynamic. Thus, the application of mixed methods research would serve the advancement of the discipline as these approaches provide richer understanding and more robust explanations of such phenomena. Practical implications: If supply chain research is to keep up with the dynamic business environment, research methods must be applied with the capability to fully explain supply chain phenomena. The application of a single‐method research approach is not always adequate for this task. Originality/value: This paper is the first to draw on research from various disciplines to investigate the use of mixed methods in logistics and supply chain management research. It examines its prevalence in the discipline, provides examples of its application from the supply chain management literature, prescribes how to implement mixed methods research, and describes the benefits and limitations of such designs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Discovery of Grounded Theory; Strategies for Qualitative Research
Glaser, B. G., Strauss, A. L., & Strutzel, E. (1968) · Nursing Research · doi:10.1097/00006199-196807000-00014 · Cited by 39,449
Mixed Methods Research: A Research Paradigm Whose Time Has Come
Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x033007014 · Cited by 11,170 · cited 1×
“As demonstrated in the published examples provided, mixed methods allow for a wide variety of supply chain research questions to be answered and provide strong, robust results (Boyer and Swink, 2008; Davis et al., 2011; Johnson and Onwuegbuzie, 2004).”
BackgroundMixing Qualitative and Quantitative Methods: Triangulation in Action.
Jick, T. D. (1979) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2392366 · Cited by 7,103
Pilkington, A., & Meredith, J. (2009) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/j.jom.2008.08.001 · Cited by 537
Transformative Mixed Methods Research
Mertens, D. M. (2010) · Qualitative Inquiry · doi:10.1177/1077800410364612 · Cited by 421
Cited by
Chowdhury, S., Budhwar, P., Dey, P. K., Joel-Edgar, S., & Abadie, A. (2022) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.01.069 · Cited by 531
Kumar, A. (2017) · Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics · doi:10.1108/apjml-09-2016-0159 · Cited by 62
Omar, A., Weerakkody, V., & Daowd, A. (2020) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2020.101458 · Cited by 51
Metadata
- Authors
- Golicic, S. L., & Davis, D. F.
- Venue
- International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2012-08-31
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 8/9
- Pages
- 726-741
- ISSN
- 0960-0035 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2044652298
- Cited by
- 218
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 8.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Implementing mixed methods research in supply chain management. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/09600031211269721
- The paper
- Golicic, S. L., & Davis, D. F. (2012). Implementing mixed methods research in supply chain management. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/09600031211269721
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.