Cited by 531AI and HR TechnologiesInformation Systems Theories and ImplementationKnowledge Management and Sharing

AI-employee collaboration and business performance: Integrating knowledge-based view, socio-technical systems and organisational socialisation framework

Chowdhury, Soumyadeb, Budhwar, Pawan, Dey, Prasanta Kumar, Joel-Edgar, Sian, Abadie, Amelie·2022·Journal of Business Research

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.01.069

Cites

132 of 132 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 16

  1. Amabile, 2020, Creativity, Artificial Intelligence, and a World of Surprises, Academy of Management Discoveries, 6
  2. Anderson, N. and Thomas, H. D. (1996). Work group socialization. In M. West (Ed) Handbook of work group psychology (pp. 423-450).
  3. Barro, 2019, People and machines: Partners in innovation, MIT Sloan Management Review, 60, 22
  4. Bieda, 2020, How Organizations Can Build Analytics Agility, MIT Sloan Management Review
  5. Bughin, 2018, Why digital strategies fail, McKinsey Quarterly.
  6. Chowdhury, 2020, Putting Responsible AI Into Practice, MIT Sloan Management Review
  7. Chui, 2018, AI adoption advances, but foundational barriers remain, McKinsey Global Institute Research
  8. Davenport, 2017, How P&G and American Express are approaching AI, Harvard Business Review
  9. Fountaine, 2019, Building the AI-powered organization, Harvard Business Review, 97, 62
  10. Kiron, 2019, Strategy For and With AI, MIT Sloan Management Review, 60, 30
  11. Knickrehm, 2018, How will AI change work? Here are 5 schools of thought, Harvard Business Review
  12. Mahidhar, 2018, Why companies that wait to adopt AI may never catch up, Harvard Business Review
  13. Ransbotham, 2017, Reshaping business with artificial intelligence: Closing the gap between ambition and action, MIT Sloan Management Review, 59
  14. Ransbotham, S., Gerbert, P., Reeves, M., Kiron, D. & Spira, M., (2018). Artificial intelligence in business gets real. MIT Sloan Management Review and Boston Consulting Group, 60280.
  15. Ransbotham S., Kiron D., Khodabandeh S., Fehling R., LaFountain B., (2019). Winning with AI. MIT Sloan Management Review and Boston Consulting Group, 61180.
  16. Wilson, 2018, Collaborative intelligence: Humans and AI are joining forces, Harvard Business Review, 96, 114

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chowdhury, S., Budhwar, P., Dey, P. K., Joel-Edgar, S., & Abadie, A.
Affiliations
  • TBS Education (FR)
  • Aston University (GB)
  • Northeastern University London (GB)
Corresponding author
Chowdhury, Soumyadeb
Venue
Journal of Business Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-05
Volume
144
Pages
31-49
ISSN
0148-2963 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4210465889
Cited by
531
References
128
Citations by year
2026: 195 · 2025: 177 · 2024: 88 · 2023: 55 · 2022: 16
FWCI
79.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Business Research (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › AI and HR Technologies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Information Systems Theories and Implementation
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Knowledge Management and Sharing
Keywords
human-AI collaboration, collaborative intelligence, firm performance, knowledge sharing, AI competencies, trust, role clarity, knowledge-based view, socio-technical systems, organizational socialization, creative industries

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review