CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 548

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Disaster preparedness: a social‐cognitive perspective

Paton, Douglas·2003·Disaster Prevention and Management: An International Journal
DOI 10.1108/09653560310480686
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Despite considerable effort and expenditure on public hazard education, levels of disaster preparedness remain low. By integrating and expanding on natural hazards and health research on protective behaviour, this paper proposes a social cognitive model of disaster preparedness. The model describes a developmental process that commences with factors that motivate people to prepare, progresses through the formation of intentions, and culminates in decisions to prepare. Following their critical appraisal, variables implicated at each stage are identified and their role in the preparedness process described. The implications of the model for the conceptualisation and assessment of preparedness is discussed, as is its implications for risk reduction and communication strategies.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/09653560310480686

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 27

  1. Abraham, C., Sheeran, P. and Johnston, M. (1998), “From health beliefs to self‐regulation: theoretical advances in the psychology of action control”, Psychology and Health, Vol. 13, pp. 569‐91.
  2. Ajzen, I. (1998), “Models of human social behaviour and their application to health psychology”, Psychology and Health, Vol. 13, pp. 735‐9. · DOI
  3. Bagozzi, R.P. (1992), “The self‐regulation of attitudes, intentions and behaviour”, Social Psychology Quarterly, Vol. 55, pp. 178‐204.
  4. Bagozzi, R.P. and Dabholar, P.A. (2000), “Discursive psychology: an alternative conceptual foundation to means‐end chain theory”, Psychology and Marketing, Vol. 17, pp. 535‐86.
  5. Bagozzi, R.P. and Edwards, E.A. (1998), “Goal setting and goal pursuit in the regulation of body weight”, Psychology and Health, Vol. 13, pp. 593‐621.
  6. Bandura, A. (1992), “Exercise of personal agency through the self‐efficacy mechanism”, in Schwarzer, R. (Ed.), Self‐Efficacy: Thought Control of Action, Hemisphere Publishing Company, Washington, DC.
  7. Bennett, P. and Murphy, S. (1997), Psychology and Health Promotion, Open University Press, Buckingham.
  8. Bishop, B., Paton, D., Syme, G. and Nancarrow, B. (2000), “Coping with environmental degradation: salination as a community stressor”, Network, Vol. 12, pp. 1‐15.
  9. Duval, T.S. and Mulilis, J.P. (1999), “A person‐relative‐to‐event (PrE) approach to negative threat appeals and earthquake preparedness: a field study”, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, Vol. 29, pp. 495‐516.
  10. Gollwitzer, P.M. (1993), “Goal achievement: the role of intentions”, in Strobe, W. and Hewstone, M. (Eds), European Review of Social Psychology, Vol. 4, pp. 141‐85.
  11. Hurnan, F. and McClure, J. (1997), “The effect of increased earthquake knowledge on perceived preventability of earthquake damage”, Australasian Journal of Disaster and Trauma Studies, Vol. 1, available at: www.massey.ac.nz/ trauma/issues/1997‐3/mcclure1.htm]
  12. Karoly, P. (1998), “Expanding the conceptual range of health self‐regulation research: a commentary”, Psychology and Health, Vol. 13, pp. 264‐91.
  13. Lamontaigne, M. and La Rochelle, S. (2000), “Earth scientists can help people who fear earthquakes”, Seismological Research Letters, Vol. 70, pp. 1‐4. · DOI
  14. Lindell, M.K. and Whitney, D.J. (2000), “Correlates of household seismic hazard adjustment adoption”, Risk Analysis, Vol. 20, pp. 13‐25.
  15. Lopes, R. (2000), “Community disaster education”, Proceedings of the Planning for an Earthquake in New Zealand Conference, IRL Conference Centre, Gracefield, 28‐29 February, Institute of Geological and Nuclear Sciences, Lower Hutt, Wellington.
  16. McClure, J., Walkey, F. and Allen, M. (1999), “When earthquake damage is seen as preventable: attributions, locus of control and attitudes to risk”, Applied Psychology: An International Review, Vol. 48, pp. 239‐56.
  17. Mulilis, J‐P. and Duval, T.S. (1995), “Negative threat appeals and earthquake preparedness: a person‐relative‐to‐event (PrE) model of coping with threat”, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, Vol. 25, pp. 1319‐39.
  18. Paton, D. (2000), “Emergency planning: integrating community development, community resilience and hazard mitigation”, Journal of the American Society of Professional Emergency Managers, Vol. 7, pp. 109‐18.
  19. Paton, D. and Bishop, B. (1996), “Disasters and communities: promoting psychosocial well‐being”, in Paton, D. and Long, N. (Eds), Psychological Aspects of Disaster: Impact, Coping, and Intervention, Dunmore Press, Palmerston North.
  20. Paton, D., Johnston, D. and Houghton, B. (2001a), “Direct and vicarious experience of volcanic hazards: implications for risk perception and adjustment adoption”, Australian Journal of Emergency Management, Vol. 15, pp. 58‐63.
  21. Paton, D., Millar, M. and Johnston, D. (2001b), “Community resilience to volcanic hazard consequences”, Natural Hazards, Vol. 24, pp. 157‐69. · DOI · Paper page
  22. Paton, D., Smith, L.M. and Johnston, D. (2000), “Volcanic hazards: risk perception and preparedness”, New Zealand Journal of Psychology, Vol. 29, pp. 84‐8.
  23. Schwarzer, R. (1992), “Self‐efficacy in the adoption and maintenance of health behaviours: theoretical approaches and a new model”, in Schwarzer, R. (Ed.), Self‐Efficacy: Thought Control of Action, Hemisphere Publishing Company, Washington, DC.
  24. Sjöberg, L. (2000), “Factors in risk perception”, Risk Analysis, Vol. 20, pp. 1‐11.
  25. Smith, K. (1993), Environmental Hazards: Assessing Risk and Reducing Disaster, Routledge, London.
  26. Spedden, S.E. (1998), “Risk perception and coping”, in Lundberg, A. (Ed.), The Environment and Mental Health: A Guide For Clinicians, LEA Inc., Mahwah, NJ.
  27. Tierney, K.J., Lindell, M.K. and Perry, R.W. (2001), Facing the Unexpected: Disaster Preparedness and Response in the United States, Joseph Henry Press, Washington, DC.

Cited by

See all 548

Metadata

Authors
Paton, D.
Venue
Disaster Prevention and Management: An International Journal
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2003-08-01
Volume
12
Issue
3
Pages
210-216
ISSN
0965-3562
DOI
10.1108/09653560310480686
Cited by
548
References
2
Language
en
Licence
www.emerald.com/insight/site-policies (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review