Cited by 39Urban Transport and AccessibilityPhysical Activity and HealthSchool Health and Nursing Education

Active travel to school: views of 10-13 year old schoolchildren in Scotland

Kirby, Joanna, Inchley, Joanna·2009·Health Education

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to explore the views of Scottish schoolchildren on active travel to school and their ideas about promotion strategies for school-based interventions. Design/methodology/approach: Focus group discussions were conducted with 66 students from four primary and three secondary schools. Findings: The most common perceived barriers to active school travel were personal safety, weather conditions and time/distance. To a lesser extent, image, physical discomfort and aspects of the physical environment also prevented children from walking or cycling to school. Perceived benefits centred on health and fitness, environmental and social factors. Enjoyment, confidence and social influences were all discussed, with the latter appearing to have the most significant impact on active travel behaviour. Students suggested a number of potential promotion strategies, including incentives and reward schemes to enhance motivation. Practical exercises such as a group walk or cycle were more popular than classroom-based activities. Research limitations/implications: Findings are limited to Scottish schoolchildren aged 10-13 in rural and semi-rural locations. Further research covering younger and older children, as well as more urban locations will broaden understanding of the impact of age and geographical location. Practical applications: The findings identify a number of influences on active travel behaviour among young people. Advancing understanding of determinants of context-specific physical activity is important for the development of effective interventions. Originality/value: This paper draws on students' own ideas about the ways in which active travel should be promoted and, as such, has important implications for the development of appropriate and acceptable school-based active travel programmes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/09654280910936611

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 31 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kirby, J., & Inchley, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Edinburgh (GB)
  • Child and Adolescent Health Research Unit, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
Venue
Health Education
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2009-02-20
Volume
109
Issue
2
Pages
169-183
ISSN
  • 0965-4283 (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-714X
OpenAlex
W2003260482
Cited by
39
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
FWCI
5.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Health Education (publishedVersion)
  • ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (submittedVersion)
  • Warwick Research Archive Portal (University of Warwick) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Urban Transport and Accessibility
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › School Health and Nursing Education
Keywords
active travel to school, elementary school students, children's perceptions, perceived safety, promotion strategy, school-based intervention, physical activity promotion

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review