Cited by 695Physical Activity and HealthUrban Transport and AccessibilityBehavioral Health and Interventions

Interventions to promote walking: systematic review

Open access
Ogilvie, David, Foster, Charles E, Rothnie, Helen, Cavill, Nick, Hamilton, Val, Fitzsimons, Claire F, Mutrie, Nanette·2007·BMJ

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effects of interventions to promote walking in individuals and populations. DESIGN: Systematic review. DATA SOURCES: Published and unpublished reports in any language identified by searching 25 electronic databases, by searching websites, reference lists, and existing systematic reviews, and by contacting experts. REVIEW METHODS: Systematic search for and appraisal of controlled before and after studies of the effects of any type of intervention on how much people walk, the distribution of effects on walking between social groups, and any associated effects on overall physical activity, fitness, risk factors for disease, health, and wellbeing. RESULTS: We included 19 randomised controlled trials and 29 non-randomised controlled studies. Interventions tailored to people's needs, targeted at the most sedentary or at those most motivated to change, and delivered either at the level of the individual (brief advice, supported use of pedometers, telecommunications) or household (individualised marketing) or through groups, can encourage people to walk more, although the sustainability, generalisability, and clinical benefits of many of these approaches are uncertain. Evidence for the effectiveness of interventions applied to workplaces, schools, communities, or areas typically depends on isolated studies or subgroup analysis. CONCLUSIONS: The most successful interventions could increase walking among targeted participants by up to 30-60 minutes a week on average, at least in the short term. From a perspective of improving population health, much of the research currently provides evidence of efficacy rather than effectiveness. Nevertheless, interventions to promote walking could contribute substantially towards increasing the activity levels of the most sedentary.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmj.39198.722720.be

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Many individuals with, or at risk of developing, type 2 diabetes prefer walking as an aerobic activity, and pedometer-based interventions can be effective for increasing aerobic activity.

    “Many individuals with, or at risk of developing, type 2 diabetes prefer walking as an aerobic activity ( 190 ), and pedometer-based interventions can be effective for increasing aerobic activity ( 30 , 205 , 258 ).”

    From Exercise and Type 2 Diabetes (2010) · cites this paper as [205]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Kahn E, Ramsey L, Brownson R, Heath G, Howze E, Powell K, et al. The effectiveness of interventions to increase physical activity: a systematic review. Am J Prev Med 2002;22(suppl 4):73-106.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ogilvie, D., Foster, C. E., Rothnie, H., Cavill, N., Hamilton, V., Fitzsimons, C. F., & Mutrie, N.
Affiliations
  • MRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit (GB)
  • University of Strathclyde (GB)
Corresponding author
Ogilvie, David
Venue
BMJ
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2007-05-31
Volume
334
Issue
7605
Pages
1204
ISSN
  • 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
  • 0959-8138
  • 1468-5833
OpenAlex
W2137697050
Cited by
695
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 56 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 48 · 2017: 48 · 2016: 50 · 2015: 51 · 2014: 56 · 2013: 54 · 2012: 49
FWCI
3.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMJ (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Strathprints: The University of Strathclyde institutional repository (University of Strathclyde) (acceptedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • NHS Health Scotland
  • Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Urban Transport and Accessibility
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
Keywords
walking promotion, physical activity interventions, sedentary behavior, pedometers, brief advice, group intervention, workplace health promotion, school-based intervention, community-based intervention, physical activity level, health risk factors, population health, intervention effectiveness
MeSH terms
Community Health Services, Counseling, Health Policy, Health Promotion, Health Status, Humans, Travel, Exercise, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Walking

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review