The DOI matches its Crossref record; 59 of the 59 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The performance benefits of being brand‐orientated
Open accessAbstract
Purpose: This paper aims to undertake an empirical study to investigate the nature and magnitude of potential benefits that accrue to firms that have a high level of brand orientation. Design/methodology/approach: A quantitative study is undertaken. The sample of firms surveyed included more than 400. The scope of the study included measuring the level of brand orientation among other variables. A conceptual model linking brand orientation and performance is developed and tested. Findings: The overall structural model fits the data well, giving confidence to interpreting the individual paths within the model. The main result is a very strong positive relationship between brand orientation and brand performance. Brand orientation also exerts another, less direct influence on performance, via brand distinctiveness. Innovation mediates the influence of brand distinctiveness. Research limitations/implications: The most obvious limitation is that the study pertains to one country only at this stage, pending more applications. The implication for firms is a very strong endorsement of the importance of using branding as a central driver of the entire marketing strategy process. The study identifies a number of brand barriers that stand in the way of becoming brand‐oriented. Recognising these brand barriers may assist firms to make progress towards becoming more brand‐oriented. Originality/value: This is one of the first studies to quantify the performance benefits of being brand‐oriented. The study is also among the first to include the role of brand distinctiveness as a potential influence on brand performance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224378101800104 · Cited by 109,190
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999) · Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1080/10705519909540118 · Cited by 108,788
Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach
Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411 · Cited by 41,941
(1998) · Cited by 36,049
Herne, H., Cooley, W. W., & Lohnes, P. R. (1973) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General) · doi:10.2307/2344428 · Cited by 35,697
Consumer Perceptions of Price, Quality, and Value: A Means-End Model and Synthesis of Evidence
Zeithaml, V. A. (1988) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/002224298805200302 · Cited by 18,292
Chaudhuri, A., & Holbrook, M. B. (2001) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jmkg.65.2.81.18255 · Cited by 6,674
Customer Loyalty: Toward an Integrated Conceptual Framework
Dick, A. S., & Basu, K. (1994) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1177/0092070394222001 · Cited by 6,591
To parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the question, weighing the merits
Little, T. D., Cunningham, W. A., Shahar, G., & Widaman, K. F. (2002) · Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1207/s15328007sem0902_1 · Cited by 6,552
Corporate Culture, Customer Orientation, and Innovativeness in Japanese Firms: A Quadrad Analysis
Deshpandé, R., Farley, J. U., & Webster, F. E. (1993) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/002224299305700102 · Cited by 3,861
Cited by
Marketing capabilities: Antecedents and implications for B2B SME performance
Merrilees, B., Rundle-Thiele, S., & Lye, A. (2011) · Industrial Marketing Management · doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2010.08.005 · Cited by 396
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Yin Wong, H., & Merrilees, B.
- Venue
- Journal of Product & Brand Management
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2008-09-19
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 372-383
- ISSN
- 1061-0421 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1985198020
- Cited by
- 274
- References
- 59
- FWCI
- 8.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The performance benefits of being brand‐orientated. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/10610420810904112
- The paper
- Yin Wong, H., & Merrilees, B. (2008). The performance benefits of being brand‐orientated. Journal of Product & Brand Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/10610420810904112
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.