The DOI matches its Crossref record; 87 of the 87 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Internet/e‐business technologies acceptance in Canada's SMEs: an exploratory investigation
Open accessAbstract
Purpose: This study aims at contributing to the discussion related to what causes Canadian small and medium‐size enterprises (SMEs) to be reticent about accepting internet and e‐business technologies (IEBT) in their operations. The research also seeks to gain an understanding of the relative importance of each of the selected factors in the research setting. Design/methodology/approach: A survey was conducted in the Atlantic region of Canada. Questionnaires were mailed to key SMEs' informants. Data analysis was performed using the partial least squares (PLS) approach. A research framework based on the technology‐organization‐environment (TOE) frameworks was used to guide the research effort. Such contingent factors as perceived benefits, management commitment/support, organizational IT competence, external pressure, information systems (IS) vendor support, and availability of financial support, were used to develop relevant hypotheses. Findings: The study's findings indicated that perceived benefits, management commitment/support, and external pressure are significant predictors of IEBT acceptance in the sampled SMEs; the results did not show that organizational IT competence, IS vendor support, and availability of financial support positively influence IEBT acceptance in the sampled SMEs. Practical implications: Policy makers, industry leaders, and small business operators wishing to understand some of the reasons why certain SMEs in the country lag in the adoption of IEBT and related technologies can benefit from the information provided in this study. The study also alerted the attention of local IS vendors and financial institutions to what can be done to strengthen IS adoption in Canadian small businesses. Originality/value: A handful of previous research in Canada has researched IEBT adoption; however, some of these studies are dated. A such, this current investigation of IEBT acceptance in a less endowed part of the country is timely and welcoming; it also serves to complement other prior studies in the country and elsewhere. A scan of the extant literature indicates that no previous study in the country has modeled some of the factors (e.g. the availability of financial support) as were used herein. The inclusion of such a factor enriches insight in this area of study.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224378101800104 · Cited by 109,190
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879 · Cited by 82,194
Rogers, E. M., Singhal, A., & Quinlan, M. M. (2019) · An Integrated Approach to Communication Theory and Research · doi:10.4324/9780203710753-35 · Cited by 37,322
Herne, H., Cooley, W. W., & Lohnes, P. R. (1973) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General) · doi:10.2307/2344428 · Cited by 35,697
Issues and opinion on structural equation modeling
Chin, W. W. (1998) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.5555/290231.290235 · Cited by 4,577
Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model
Legris, P., Ingham, J., & Collerette, P. (2003) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/s0378-7206(01)00143-4 · Cited by 4,250
Aaker, D. A., Kumar, V., Day, G. S., & Luck, D. J. (1970) · Cited by 3,553
Innovation characteristics and innovation adoption-implementation: A meta-analysis of findings
Tornatzky, L. G., & Klein, K. J. (1982) · IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management · doi:10.1109/tem.1982.6447463 · Cited by 3,280
Electronic Data Interchange and Small Organizations: Adoption and Impact of Technology
Iacovou, C. L., Benbasat, I., & Dexter, A. S. (1995) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249629 · Cited by 2,497
processes of technological innovation
Tornatzky, L. G., Fleischer, M., & Chakrabarti, A. (1990) · Cited by 1,834
Cited by
Oliveira, T., Thomas, M., & Espadanal, M. (2014) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2014.03.006 · Cited by 1,255
Understanding AI adoption in manufacturing and production firms using an integrated TAM-TOE model
Chatterjee, S., Rana, N. P., Dwivedi, Y. K., & Baabdullah, A. M. (2021) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120880 · Cited by 825
A conceptual model for the process of IT innovation adoption in organizations
Hameed, M. A., Counsell, S., & Swift, S. (2012) · Journal of Engineering and Technology Management · doi:10.1016/j.jengtecman.2012.03.007 · Cited by 442
Factors Influencing SMEs Adoption of Social Media Marketing
Dahnil, M. I., Marzuki, K. M., Langgat, J., & Fabeil, N. F. (2014) · Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.07.025 · Cited by 366
Aboelmaged, M. G. (2014) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2014.05.002 · Cited by 355
Metadata
- Authors
- Ifinedo, P.
- Venue
- Internet Research
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2011-01-28
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 255-281
- ISSN
- 1066-2243 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2146217629
- Cited by
- 287
- References
- 87
- FWCI
- 32.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Internet/e‐business technologies acceptance in Canada's SMEs: an exploratory investigation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/10662241111139309
- The paper
- Ifinedo, P. (2011). Internet/e‐business technologies acceptance in Canada's SMEs: an exploratory investigation. Internet Research. https://doi.org/10.1108/10662241111139309
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.