Cited by 29Private Equity and Venture CapitalEntrepreneurship Studies and InfluencesCommunity Development and Social Impact

Developments in the promotion of informal venture capital in the UK

Harrison, Richard, Mason, Colin·1996·International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research

Abstract

Concern about the equity gap in the UK has existed for more than 60 years. Despite various government measures and institutional responses (e.g. the development of a venture capital industry) an equity gap still persists. Current debate has recognized the role of the informal venture capital market as a source of risk capital for SMEs. Argues that this market is both inefficient and underdeveloped, due largely to information deficiencies which hinder contact between potential investors and entrepreneurs seeking finance. Against this background, identifies the role of business angel networks (BANs) as a key means of stimulating the flow of informational venture capital in the UK. In particular, a government scheme to provide pump‐priming assistance to establish five local BAN demonstration projects is shown to have achieved impressive results. However, with the recent emergence of a number of private sector BANs, the continued role of government is now being questioned. Further demonstrates that public sector BANs, operating on a local scale, are filling a different market niche from that of private sector BANs, which operate predominantly on a national scale. Concludes that the top priority for policy is to ensure that all parts of the UK are served by local BANs. An appropriate way forward might be to build on experimental networking arrangements between local, public sector BANs and national, privately operated BANs.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/13552559610119313

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • If the investment infrastructure (venture finance networks) is weak, it may lead to the failure of new technologies or practices, an inability to enter markets, and the premature failure of entrepreneurial firms.

    “If the investment infrastructure (venture finance networks) is weak it may lead to the failure of new technologies or practices, an inability to enter markets, and the premature failure of entrepreneurial firms (Harrison and Mason, 1996;Bygrave, 1987;1988).”

    From Networking and innovation: a systematic review of the evidence (2004) · cites this paper as Harrison and Mason, 1996

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Harrison, R., & Mason, C.
Affiliations
  • University of Ulster (GB)
  • University of Southampton (GB)
Venue
International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research
Publisher
Emerald
Published
1996-08-01
Volume
2
Issue
2
Pages
6-33
ISSN
1355-2554 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2012442380
Cited by
29
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
13.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Private Equity and Venture Capital
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Community Development and Social Impact
Keywords
informal venture capital, equity gaps, SME financing, risk capital, information asymmetry, government support programs, United Kingdom

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review