Cited by 184E-commerce and Technology InnovationsQuality and Supply ManagementPublic Procurement and Policy

Business‐to‐business e‐procurement: success factors and challenges to implementation

Angeles, Rebecca, Nath, Ravi·2007·Supply Chain Management: An International Journal

Abstract

Purpose The paper seeks to pursue the understanding of current business‐to‐business e‐procurement practices by describing the success factors and challenges to its implementation in the corporate setting. Design/methodology/approach Members of the Institute for Supply Management and the Council of Logistics Management were asked to respond to a survey questionnaire. Factor analysis was used to analyze data from valid responses received from 185 firms. Findings Factor analysis resulted in three e‐procurement success factors (SF):supplier and contract management; end‐user behavior and e‐procurement business processes; and information and e‐procurement infrastructure. Three challenge‐to‐implementation factors (CIF) also emerged: lack of system integration and standardization issues; immaturity of e‐procurement‐based market services and end‐user resistance; and maverick buying and difficulty in integrating e‐commerce with other systems. Research limitations/implications A representative sampling design should be used in the future to be able to make claims for generalizable results. Practical implications E‐procurement is a very important initiative with significant cost savings potential for firms. This study's findings can guide various stages of corporate implementation efforts. Originality/value This study fulfills the need for solid empirical findings on this very important topic that has a direct impact on a firm's bottom line. E‐procurement is still in the early stages of…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/13598540710737299

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Immaturity of technology is a barrier to e-procurement success at the organisational level.

    “This fits well with previous organisational-level studies indicating the immaturity of technology as a barrier to e-procurement success (Angeles and Nath, 2007; Gunasekaran et al., 2009).”

    From Examining the antecedents of the technology acceptance model within e-procurement (2018) · cites this paper as Angeles and Nath, 2007

  • A significant proportion of extant e-procurement literature focuses on decision-making at an organisational level, investigating the factors that drive organisations towards the adoption of such technologies.

    “A significant proportion of extant e-procurement literature focuses on decision-making at an organisational level, investigating the factors that drive organisations towards the adoption of such technologies (Angeles and Nath, 2007; Gunasekaran and Ngai, 2008; Mishra et al. 2007; Wu et al. 2007).”

    From Examining the antecedents of the technology acceptance model within e-procurement (2018) · cites this paper as Angeles and Nath, 2007

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Angeles, R., & Nath, R.
Affiliations
  • University of New Brunswick (CA)
  • Creighton University (US)
Venue
Supply Chain Management: An International Journal
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2007-03-20
Volume
12
Issue
2
Pages
104-115
ISSN
1359-8546 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2051932184
Cited by
184
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 18
FWCI
32.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Supply Chain Management An International Journal (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Business and International Management › E-commerce and Technology Innovations
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Quality and Supply Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Public Procurement and Policy
Keywords
end-user behavior, information infrastructure, system integration, standardization, e-commerce integration, supply management, logistics management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review