Business‐to‐business e‐procurement: success factors and challenges to implementation
Abstract
Purpose The paper seeks to pursue the understanding of current business‐to‐business e‐procurement practices by describing the success factors and challenges to its implementation in the corporate setting. Design/methodology/approach Members of the Institute for Supply Management and the Council of Logistics Management were asked to respond to a survey questionnaire. Factor analysis was used to analyze data from valid responses received from 185 firms. Findings Factor analysis resulted in three e‐procurement success factors (SF):supplier and contract management; end‐user behavior and e‐procurement business processes; and information and e‐procurement infrastructure. Three challenge‐to‐implementation factors (CIF) also emerged: lack of system integration and standardization issues; immaturity of e‐procurement‐based market services and end‐user resistance; and maverick buying and difficulty in integrating e‐commerce with other systems. Research limitations/implications A representative sampling design should be used in the future to be able to make claims for generalizable results. Practical implications E‐procurement is a very important initiative with significant cost savings potential for firms. This study's findings can guide various stages of corporate implementation efforts. Originality/value This study fulfills the need for solid empirical findings on this very important topic that has a direct impact on a firm's bottom line. E‐procurement is still in the early stages of…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Immaturity of technology is a barrier to e-procurement success at the organisational level.
“This fits well with previous organisational-level studies indicating the immaturity of technology as a barrier to e-procurement success (Angeles and Nath, 2007; Gunasekaran et al., 2009).”
From Examining the antecedents of the technology acceptance model within e-procurement (2018) · cites this paper as Angeles and Nath, 2007
A significant proportion of extant e-procurement literature focuses on decision-making at an organisational level, investigating the factors that drive organisations towards the adoption of such technologies.
“A significant proportion of extant e-procurement literature focuses on decision-making at an organisational level, investigating the factors that drive organisations towards the adoption of such technologies (Angeles and Nath, 2007; Gunasekaran and Ngai, 2008; Mishra et al. 2007; Wu et al. 2007).”
From Examining the antecedents of the technology acceptance model within e-procurement (2018) · cites this paper as Angeles and Nath, 2007
Cites
A Paradigm for Developing Better Measures of Marketing Constructs
Churchill, G. A. (1979) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224377901600110 · Cited by 16,549 · see citing works
An Index of Factorial Simplicity
Kaiser, H. F. (1974) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02291575 · Cited by 14,898 · see citing works
The Adoption of Electronic Procurement in Singapore
Kheng, C. B., & Al-Hawamdeh, S. (2002) · Electronic Commerce Research · doi:10.1023/a:1013388018056 · Cited by 88 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Examining the antecedents of the technology acceptance model within e-procurement
Brandon-Jones, A., & Kauppi, K. (2018) · International Journal of Operations & Production Management · doi:10.1108/ijopm-06-2015-0346 · Cited by 181 · see citing works
What is the value of an IT e-procurement system?
Ronchi, S., Brun, A., Golini, R., & Fan, X. (2010) · Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management · doi:10.1016/j.pursup.2010.03.013 · Cited by 122 · see citing works
Critical success factors for B2B e‐commerce use within the UK NHS pharmaceutical supply chain
Cullen, A. J., & Taylor, M. (2009) · International Journal of Operations & Production Management · doi:10.1108/01443570911000177 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
Singh, P. K., & Chan, S. W. (2022) · Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity · doi:10.3390/joitmc8020061 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
“E-tendering is the technique used to send a Request for Proposal (RFP) and Request for Information (RFI) to providers and to receive answers using Web technology [10,11,18,122].”
BackgroundMethodChen, Y., Bretschneider, S., Stritch, J. M., Darnall, N., & Hsueh, L. (2022) · Public Management Review · doi:10.1080/14719037.2021.1874497 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
E‐procurement implementation: a case of Malaysia government
Aman, A., & Kasimin, H. (2011) · Transforming Government People Process and Policy · doi:10.1108/17506161111173586 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
The impact of user‐perceived e‐procurement quality on system and contract compliance
Brandon‐Jones, A., & Carey, S. (2011) · International Journal of Operations & Production Management · doi:10.1108/01443571111111928 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Sánchez-Rodríguez, C., Martínez-Lorente, A. R., & Hemsworth, D. (2020) · Benchmarking: An International Journal · doi:10.1108/bij-12-2018-0413 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Ensuring corporate travel compliance – Control vs. commitment strategies
Holma, A.-M., Bask, A., & Kauppi, K. (2015) · Tourism Management · doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2015.04.008 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
A survey on adoption of e-procurement in Indian organisations
Gupta, M., & Narain, R. (2012) · International Journal of Indian Culture and Business Management · doi:10.1504/ijicbm.2012.044019 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Information Technology readiness index for adoption of e-procurement
Padhi, S. S., & Mohapatra, P. K. J. (2011) · Electronic Government, an International Journal · doi:10.1504/eg.2011.037695 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
- Authors
- Angeles, R., & Nath, R.
- Affiliations
- University of New Brunswick (CA)
- Creighton University (US)
- Venue
- Supply Chain Management: An International Journal
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2007-03-20
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 104-115
- ISSN
- 1359-8546 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2051932184
- Cited by
- 184
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 18
- FWCI
- 32.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Supply Chain Management An International Journal (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Business and International Management › E-commerce and Technology Innovations
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Quality and Supply Management
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Public Procurement and Policy
- Keywords
- end-user behavior, information infrastructure, system integration, standardization, e-commerce integration, supply management, logistics management
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review