The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Benefits, barriers, and bridges to effective supply chain management
Abstract
Purpose – The purpose of this article is to provide academics and practitioners a quantitative and qualitative analysis of the benefits, barriers, and bridges to successful collaboration in strategic supply chains. Design/methodology/approach – A triangulation method consisting of a literature review, a cross‐functional mail survey, and 51 in‐depth case analyses was implemented. Senior managers from purchasing, manufacturing, and logistics were targeted in the mail survey. The break down by channel category interviews is as follows: 14 retailers, 13 finished goods assemblers, 12 first‐tier suppliers, three lower‐tier suppliers, and nine service providers. Findings – Customer satisfaction and service is perceived as more enduring than cost savings. All managers recognize technology, information, and measurement systems as major barriers to successful supply chain collaboration. However, the people issues – such as culture, trust, aversion to change, and willingness to collaborate – are more intractable. People are the key bridge to successful collaborative innovation and should therefore not be overlooked as companies invest in supply chain enablers such as technology, information, and measurement systems. Research limitations/implications – The average mail‐survey response rate was relatively low: 23.5 percent. The case study analyses were not consistent in frequency across channel functions. Although the majority of companies interviewed and surveyed were international, all surveys and interviews were managers based in the US. Practical implications – This study provides new insight into understanding the success and hindering factors of supply chain management. The extensive literature review, the cross‐channel analysis, and case studies provide academics and managers a macro picture of the goals, challenges, and strategies for implementing supply chain management. Originality/value – This paper uses triangulation methodology for examining key issues of supply chain management at multiple levels within the supply chain.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mixing Qualitative and Quantitative Methods: Triangulation in Action.
Jick, T. D. (1979) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2392366 · Cited by 7,103 · cited 1×
“To develop this picture and extract “a more robust and generalizable set of findings,” a triangulation approach was used (Scandura and Williams, 2000, p. 1250; Jick, 1979; Lewis, 1998).”
MethodInformation Processing, Knowledge Development, and Strategic Supply Chain Performance
Hult, G. T. M., Ketchen, D. J., & Slater, S. F. (2004) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/20159575 · Cited by 813
Interfirm Rivalry and Managerial Complexity: A Conceptual Framework of Alliance Failure
Park, S. H., & Ungson, G. R. (2001) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.12.1.37.10118 · Cited by 793
Cited by
FAWCETT, S. E., WALLIN, C., ALLRED, C., FAWCETT, A. M., & MAGNAN, G. M. (2011) · Journal of Supply Chain Management · doi:10.1111/j.1745-493x.2010.03213.x · Cited by 512
Self-citationA decade of supply chain collaboration and directions for future research
Soosay, C. A., & Hyland, P. (2015) · Supply Chain Management: An International Journal · doi:10.1108/scm-06-2015-0217 · Cited by 434
Blockchain: case studies in food supply chain visibility
Rogerson, M., & Parry, G. C. (2020) · Supply Chain Management: An International Journal · doi:10.1108/scm-08-2019-0300 · Cited by 411
Retail logistics in the transition from multi-channel to omni-channel
Hübner, A., Wollenburg, J., & Holzapfel, A. (2016) · International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management · doi:10.1108/ijpdlm-08-2015-0179 · Cited by 317
PEEKING INSIDE THE BLACK BOX: TOWARD AN UNDERSTANDING OF SUPPLY CHAIN COLLABORATION DYNAMICS
FAWCETT, S. E., FAWCETT, A. M., WATSON, B. J., & MAGNAN, G. M. (2012) · Journal of Supply Chain Management · doi:10.1111/j.1745-493x.2011.03241.x · Cited by 266
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Fawcett, S. E., Magnan, G. M., & McCarter, M. W.
- Venue
- Supply Chain Management: An International Journal
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2008-01-25
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 35-48
- ISSN
- 1359-8546 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2061842011
- Cited by
- 703
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 54.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Benefits, barriers, and bridges to effective supply chain management. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/13598540810850300
- The paper
- Fawcett, S. E., Magnan, G. M., & McCarter, M. W. (2008). Benefits, barriers, and bridges to effective supply chain management. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/13598540810850300
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.