The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Making connections: a review of supply chain management and sustainability literature
Open accessAbstract
Purpose: The objective of this paper is to investigate systematically the discipline of supply chain management (SCM) within the context of sustainability. The two concepts are increasingly aligned, and sustainable supply chain management (SSCM) represents an evolving field where they explicitly interact. Given their complex and holistic nature, breaking down the literature to understand its structures, processes, connections and limitations can provide an objective view of the status of research in these highly important fields, identifying key areas for future research/theory development. Design/methodology/approach: A systematic review of current SCM literature is carried out, specifically in relation to the social and environmental dimensions of sustainability. Findings: SSCM and the integration of sustainability into supply chains is a significant but evolving field evidenced by a current bias in the literature towards theory development and highly qualitative research methods. The environmental dimension is significantly better represented in the literature through specific processes at all stages of the supply chain. The social dimension is recognised, but receives less emphasis than expected given SCM's focus on interaction, relationships and communication. These two dimensions are treated separately in the literature with limited insight on how to integrate them and current SCM and sustainability research provides limited practical outputs. Research limitations/implications: The review focuses on environmental and social sustainability within supply chains without explicit consideration of the economic dimension. Practical implications: The review highlights the key themes and issues for supply chain managers faced with implementing sustainability. It also illustrates a number of areas for future research, along with the need for researchers to develop more practical tools for implementing SSCM. Originality/value: Indicates the extent to which sustainability is integrated within SCM and where the research emphasis currently lies. The environmental dimension is significantly more defined and developed in the literature. SCM literature emphasises the importance of long‐term supplier relationships, but this “people‐focused” approach does not appear to translate into socially responsible supply chains. It suggests that the more process‐driven nature of environmental sustainability makes it easier to put into supply chain practice. There is also limited research or evidence on how the two dimensions can be integrated despite recognition of their inter‐relationship.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hartley, J. (2004) · Essential Guide to Qualitative Methods in Organizational Research · doi:10.4135/9781446280119.n26 · Cited by 15,461
Beyond the Business Case for Corporate Sustainability
Dyllick, T., & Hockerts, K. (2002) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.323 · Cited by 4,029
WHY COMPANIES GO GREEN: A MODEL OF ECOLOGICAL RESPONSIVENESS.
Bansal, P., & Roth, K. (2000) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/1556363 · Cited by 4,020
Who Sustains Whose Development? Sustainable Development and the Reinvention of Nature
Banerjee, S. B. (2003) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/0170840603024001341 · Cited by 785
THINKING DIFFERENTLY ABOUT PURCHASING PORTFOLIOS: AN ASSESSMENT OF SUSTAINABLE SOURCING
PAGELL, M., WU, Z., & WASSERMAN, M. E. (2010) · Journal of Supply Chain Management · doi:10.1111/j.1745-493x.2009.03186.x · Cited by 411
KRAUSE, D. R., VACHON, S., & KLASSEN, R. D. (2009) · Journal of Supply Chain Management · doi:10.1111/j.1745-493x.2009.03173.x · Cited by 399
Cited by
Theories in sustainable supply chain management: A structured literature review
Touboulic, A., & Walker, H. (2015) · International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management · doi:10.1108/ijpdlm-05-2013-0106 · Cited by 688
Wilhelm, M. M., Blome, C., Bhakoo, V., & Paulraj, A. (2016) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/j.jom.2015.11.001 · Cited by 539
Towards a theory of multi-tier sustainable supply chains: A systematic literature review
M. Tachizawa, E., & Yew Wong, C. (2014) · Supply Chain Management: An International Journal · doi:10.1108/scm-02-2014-0070 · Cited by 419
Mani, V., Gunasekaran, A., & Delgado, C. (2018) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.10.025 · Cited by 408
Marshall, D., McCarthy, L., McGrath, P., & Claudy, M. (2015) · Supply Chain Management: An International Journal · doi:10.1108/scm-08-2014-0267 · Cited by 332
Metadata
- Authors
- Ashby, A., Leat, M., & Hudson‐Smith, M.
- Venue
- Supply Chain Management: An International Journal
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2012-08-03
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 497-516
- ISSN
- 1359-8546 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2036324385
- Cited by
- 795
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 128.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Making connections: a review of supply chain management and sustainability literature. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/13598541211258573
- The paper
- Ashby, A., Leat, M., & Hudson‐Smith, M. (2012). Making connections: a review of supply chain management and sustainability literature. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/13598541211258573
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.