Cited by 399Sustainable Supply Chain ManagementQuality and Supply ManagementEnvironmental Sustainability in Business

SPECIAL TOPIC FORUM ON SUSTAINABLE SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT: INTRODUCTION AND REFLECTIONS ON THE ROLE OF PURCHASING MANAGEMENT*

KRAUSE, DANIEL R., VACHON, STEPHAN, KLASSEN, ROBERT D.·2009·Journal of Supply Chain Management

Abstract

This paper introduces a special topic forum on “Sustainable Supply Chain Management.” Before introducing the papers included in the forum, the authors provide thoughts on the direction and future of sustainability research, particularly in the context of purchasing and supply chain management. The underlying premise that structures our discussion is straightforward: a company is no more sustainable than its supply chain. As such the purchasing function becomes central in a company's sustainability effort. In doing so, we reflect on the relationship between purchasing management and sustainable development by drawing from Kraljic's seminal article on how “Purchasing Must Become Supply Management.”

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1745-493x.2009.03173.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Sustainability evidence gathering in attempting to develop support for any theoretical approach is notoriously difficult, including what to measure in terms of institutional impacts and what boundaries to set around sustainability and its implications for management.

    “We also place the caveat that sustainability evidence gathering in attempting to develop support for any theoretical approach is notoriously difficult - what to measure in terms of the institutional impacts , for instance, and what boundaries to set around such a diffuse and contested term as sustainability and its implications for management (Krause, Vachon & Klassen 2009).”

    From Conceptualising the adoption of sustainable procurement: an institutional theory perspective (2014) · cites this paper as Krause, Vachon & Klassen 2009

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
KRAUSE, D. R., VACHON, S., & KLASSEN, R. D.
Affiliations
  • University of Victoria (CA)
  • HEC Montréal (CA)
  • Western University (CA)
Venue
Journal of Supply Chain Management
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-09-11
Volume
45
Issue
4
Pages
18-25
ISSN
  • 1055-6001 (ISSN-L)
  • 1523-2409
  • 1745-493X
OpenAlex
W1998787313
Cited by
399
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 38 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 30 · 2015: 33 · 2014: 31 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 13
FWCI
32.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Supply Chain Management (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Quality and Supply Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Environmental Sustainability in Business
Keywords
sustainable supply chain management, procurement management, sustainable development, corporate sustainability, supply management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review