Cited by 204Innovative Education and Learning PracticesOrganizational Learning and LeadershipAdult and Continuing Education Topics

From workplace learning to inter‐organizational learning and back: the contribution of activity theory

Engeström, Yrjö, Kerosuo, Hannele·2007·Journal of Workplace Learning

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to show how activity theory transcends the boundary between workplace learning and organizational learning. Design/methodology/approach: Activity‐theoretical analyses examine collectives and organizations as learners. On the other hand, activity theory is committed to pedagogical and interventionist actions to change and learning characteristic of workplace learning. Findings: Activity‐theoretical studies put an emphasis on the object, i.e. on what is done and learned together in inter‐organizational networks, instead of studying only connections and collaboration of networks. The theory of expansive learning enables a longitudinal and rich analysis of inter‐organizational learning and makes a specific contribution in outlining the historical transformation of work and organizations by using observational as well as interventionist designs in studies of work and organization. Originality/value: The paper shows that activity theory and the theory of expansive learning provide useful analytical tools for the enrichment of studies in workplace learning, as reported in the articles included in this special issue.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/13665620710777084

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Many researchers have come to recognize that boundaries challenge established practices and carry learning potential.

    “Many researchers have come to recognize that boundaries challenge established practices and carry learning potential (Engeström 2001;Engeström and Kerosuo 2007;Johannessen and Ellingsen 2009).”

    From Unpacking the Role of Boundaries in Computer-Supported Collaborative Teaching (2020) · cites this paper as Engeström and Kerosuo 2007

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Engeström, Y., & Kerosuo, H.
Affiliations
University of Helsinki (FI)
Venue
Journal of Workplace Learning
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2007-08-14
Volume
19
Issue
6
Pages
336-342
ISSN
1366-5626 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1980608470
Cited by
204
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 13
FWCI
22.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Workplace Learning (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Innovative Education and Learning Practices
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Organizational Learning and Leadership
  • Social Sciences › Education › Adult and Continuing Education Topics
Keywords
activity theory, inter-organizational learning, workplace learning, organizational learning, expansive learning, interorganizational networks, collective learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review