Cited by 102Innovative Education and Learning PracticesAdult and Continuing Education TopicsOrganizational Learning and Leadership

Activity Theory and Learning at Work

Engeström, Yrjö·2014·Tätigkeit - Aneignung - Bildung

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/978-3-658-02120-7_3

Cites

134 of 134 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 138 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Engeström, Y.
Affiliations
University of Helsinki (FI)
Corresponding author
Engeström, Yrjö
Venue
Tätigkeit - Aneignung - Bildung
Published
2014
Pages
67-96
OpenAlex
W39290763
Cited by
101
References
138
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 3
FWCI
18.33
Type
book chapter
Language
de
Open access
closed
Locations
Springer eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Innovative Education and Learning Practices
  • Social Sciences › Education › Adult and Continuing Education Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Organizational Learning and Leadership
Keywords
activity theory, workplace learning, Vygotsky's zone of proximal development, appropriations, Change Laboratory, institutional learning, critical situations, Yrjö Engeström

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review