The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Complex acts of knowing: paradox and descriptive self‐awareness
Abstract
We are reaching the end of the second generation of knowledge management, with its focus on tacit‐explicit knowledge conversion. Triggered by the SECI model of Nonaka, it replaced a first generation focus on timely information provision for decision support and in support of BPR initiatives. Like BPR it has substantially failed to deliver on its promised benefits. The third generation requires the clear separation of context, narrative and content management and challenges the orthodoxy of scientific management. Complex adaptive systems theory is used to create a sense‐making model that utilises self‐organising capabilities of the informal communities and identifies a natural flow model of knowledge creation, disruption and utilisation. However, the argument from nature of many complexity thinkers is rejected given the human capability to create order and predictability through collective and individual acts of freewill. Knowledge is seen paradoxically, as both a thing and a flow requiring diverse management approaches.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation
Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780195092691.001.0001 · Cited by 18,010
The Knowledge-Creating Company
Nonaka, I. (1998) · The Economic Impact of Knowledge · doi:10.1016/b978-0-7506-7009-8.50016-1 · Cited by 14,619
The Concept of “Ba”: Building a Foundation for Knowledge Creation
Nonaka, I., & Konno, N. (1998) · California Management Review · doi:10.2307/41165942 · Cited by 4,556
Hammer, M. M., & Champy, J. A. (1993) · Cited by 2,519
Sources of Power: How People Make Decisions
Klein, G. A., & Sullivan, J. (2001) · Leadership and Management in Engineering · doi:10.1061/(asce)1532-6748(2001)1:1(21 · Cited by 2,150
Making Invisible Work Visible: Using Social Network Analysis to Support Strategic Collaboration
Cross, R., Borgatti, S. P., & Parker, A. (2002) · California Management Review · doi:10.2307/41166121 · Cited by 924
Complex Responsive Processes in Organizations: Learning and Knowledge Creation
Stacey, R. D. (2001) · University of Hertfordshire Research Archive (University of Hertfordshire) · Cited by 881
Dynamics in action: intentional behavior as a complex system
(2000) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.38-1494 · Cited by 562
Dynamics in Action: Intentional Behavior as a Complex System
Juarrero, A. (1999) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/2528.001.0001 · Cited by 558
Cultural Anthropology: A Contemporary Perspective
Sullivan, M., & Keesing, R. M. (1981) · Anthropological Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3317238 · Cited by 538
Cited by
Exploring the effects of trust, task interdependence and virtualness on knowledge sharing in teams
Staples, D. S., & Webster, J. (2008) · Information Systems Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2575.2007.00244.x · Cited by 548
The Trouble with Transparency: A Critical Review of Openness in e‐Government
Bannister, F., & Connolly, R. (2011) · Policy & Internet · doi:10.2202/1944-2866.1076 · Cited by 368
Knowledge management and measurement: a critical review
A.F. Ragab, M., & Arisha, A. (2013) · Journal of Knowledge Management · doi:10.1108/jkm-12-2012-0381 · Cited by 323
Clarifying the project complexity construct: Past, present and future
Bakhshi, J., Ireland, V., & Gorod, A. (2016) · International Journal of Project Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.06.002 · Cited by 293
Digital twins for collaborative robots: A case study in human-robot interaction
Malik, A. A., & Brem, A. (2021) · Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing · doi:10.1016/j.rcim.2020.102092 · Cited by 284
Metadata
- Authors
- Snowden, D.
- Venue
- Journal of Knowledge Management
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2002-05-01
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 100-111
- ISSN
- 1367-3270 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2135459615
- Cited by
- 956
- References
- 11
- FWCI
- 200.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Complex acts of knowing: paradox and descriptive self‐awareness. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/13673270210424639
- The paper
- Snowden, D. (2002). Complex acts of knowing: paradox and descriptive self‐awareness. Journal of Knowledge Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270210424639
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.