The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Global ranking of knowledge management and intellectual capital academic journals
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to develop a global ranking of knowledge management and intellectual capital academic journals. Design/methodology/approach: An online questionnaire was completed by 233 active knowledge management and intellectual capital researchers from 41 countries. Two different approaches: journal rank‐order and journal scoring method were utilized and produced similar results. Findings: It was found that the top five academic journals in the field are: Journal of Knowledge Management, Journal of Intellectual Capital, Knowledge Management Research and Practice, International Journal of Knowledge Management, and The Learning Organization. It was also concluded that the major factors affecting perceptions of quality of academic journals are editor and review board reputation, inclusion in citation indexes, opinion of leading researchers, appearance in ranking lists, and citation impact. Research limitations/implications: This study was the first of its kind to develop a ranking system for academic journals in the field. Such a list will be very useful for academic recruitment, as well as tenure and promotion decisions. Practical implications: The findings from this study may be utilized by various practitioners including knowledge management professionals, university administrators, review committees and corporate librarians. Originality/value: This paper represents the first documented attempt to develop a ranking of knowledge management and intellectual capital academic journals through a survey of field contributors.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Garfield, E. (1972) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.178.4060.471 · Cited by 2,788
Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research
Seglen, P. O. (1997) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.314.7079.497 · Cited by 2,447
The Matthew Effect in Science, II: Cumulative Advantage and the Symbolism of Intellectual Property
Merton, R. K. (1988) · Isis · doi:10.1086/354848 · Cited by 1,397
Peer-review practices of psychological journals: The fate of published articles, submitted again
Peters, D. P., & Ceci, S. J. (1982) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00011183 · Cited by 1,079 · cited 1×
“), and the same paper as was accepted by a journal in the past is likely to be rejected later ( Peters and Ceci, 1982”
BackgroundA Ranking List for Information Systems Journals
Fisher, J., Shanks, G., & Lamp, J. W. (2007) · Australasian Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.3127/ajis.v14i2.469 · Cited by 39
Cited by
Reflections and projections: A decade of Intellectual Capital Accounting Research
Guthrie, J., Ricceri, F., & Dumay, J. (2012) · The British Accounting Review · doi:10.1016/j.bar.2012.03.004 · Cited by 698
Knowledge management: A global examination based on bibliometric analysis
Gaviria-Marin, M., Merigó, J. M., & Baier-Fuentes, H. (2019) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2018.07.006 · Cited by 560
Twenty years of the Journal of Knowledge Management: a bibliometric analysis
Gaviria-Marin, M., Merigo, J. M., & Popa, S. (2018) · Journal of Knowledge Management · doi:10.1108/jkm-10-2017-0497 · Cited by 346
Exploring the role of customer relationship management (CRM) systems in customer knowledge creation
Khodakarami, F., & Chan, Y. E. (2014) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2013.09.001 · Cited by 321
Cabrilo, S., & Dahms, S. (2018) · Journal of Knowledge Management · doi:10.1108/jkm-07-2017-0309 · Cited by 258
Metadata
- Authors
- Serenko, A., & Bontis, N.
- Venue
- Journal of Knowledge Management
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2009-02-20
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 4-15
- ISSN
- 1367-3270 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2110967597
- Cited by
- 219
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 15.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Global ranking of knowledge management and intellectual capital academic journals. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/13673270910931125
- The paper
- Serenko, A., & Bontis, N. (2009). Global ranking of knowledge management and intellectual capital academic journals. Journal of Knowledge Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270910931125
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.