Cited by 224Quality and Supply ManagementSupply Chain and Inventory ManagementSustainable Supply Chain Management

Collaborative supply chain management: The most promising practice for building efficient and sustainable supply chains

Attaran, Mohsen, Attaran, Sharmin·2007·Business Process Management Journal

Abstract

Purpose The aim of this paper is to provide an overview of contemporary supply‐chain management systems. Design/methodology/approach The paper highlights the examples of state‐of‐the‐art practice in supply‐chain management, and speculates about where this movement is headed. Some of the collaborative supply chain management products generating the most interest will also be examined. Findings Collaborative planning, forecasting and replenishment (CPFR) is the most recent prolific management initiative that provides supply chain collaboration and visibility. By following CPFR, companies can dramatically improve supply chain effectiveness with demand planning, synchronized production scheduling, logistic planning, and new product design. CPFR will force suppliers to innovate, building on strong one‐to‐one relationships that will drive smarter ways of doing things. Most companies and industries can benefit from CPFR. However, companies that experience variation in demand, buy or sell a product on a periodic basis, and those that deal in highly differentiated or branded products will benefit the most. Practical implications Practitioners can gain first‐hand knowledge of the CPFR model, technology and factors influencing adoption. Practitioners can also find examples of state‐of‐the‐art practice in supply‐chain management, and study some of the collaborative supply chain management products generating the most interest. Originality/value The paper is valuable to practitioners interested in implementing CPFR in their organizations.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/14637150710752308

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Achieving outstanding performance in the supply chain holds strategic significance, potentially resulting in swift financial returns, often seen within months, along with enhancements in productivity and overall profits.

    “Furthermore, achieving outstanding performance in the supply chain holds strategic significance, potentially resulting in swift financial returns, often seen within months, along with enhancements in productivity and overall profits [100].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Attaran, M., & Attaran, S.
Affiliations
  • California State University, Bakersfield (US)
  • University of Illinois Chicago (US)
Venue
Business Process Management Journal
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2007-06-12
Volume
13
Issue
3
Pages
390-404
ISSN
1463-7154 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1510994142
Cited by
224
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 15
FWCI
11.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Business Process Management Journal (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Quality and Supply Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Supply Chain and Inventory Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
Keywords
collaborative supply chain management, CPFR, supply chain collaboration, demand planning, logistics planning, new product design, supplier relationships, supply chain visibility, technology adoption, demand variability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review