The DOI matches its Crossref record.
An international comparative analysis of sustainability transformation across seven universities
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to identify the key aspects of transformation of universities towards sustainability, such as the ideal characteristics of the “sustainable university”, and the drivers and barriers in the transformation, by comparing the strategies of seven universities world‐wide. Design/methodology/approach: A systems transformation analysis of seven case studies has been applied through a self‐evaluation based on the tridimensional Framework‐Level‐Actors (FLA) method. Findings: The study shows that none of the three dimensions of change is predominant over the others. The main barrier to be overcome is the lack of incentive structure for promoting changes at the individual level. The main drivers for change are the presence of “connectors” with society, the existence of coordination bodies and projects, and the availability of funding, all of which are important for progress. Enhancing interdisciplinarity is a strategic objective at almost all of these universities, while transformative learning is less present. A common characteristic for most of the institutions is establishing and supporting networks of expertise within the universities. These universities show important strategic efforts and initiatives that drive and nucleate change for sustainable development, the result of a combination of drivers. Practical implications: The FLA‐method has proved useful for being used at the level of comparing case‐studies through a bird's‐eye perspective. Originality/value: The paper demonstrates the application of a simple tool that gives a global perspective on transformational strategies used in seven cases world‐wide in the search for commonalities and differences.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Aleixo, A. M., Leal, S., & Azeiteiro, U. M. (2018) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.11.010 · Cited by 485
Interdisciplinary engineering education: A review of vision, teaching, and support
Van den Beemt, A., MacLeod, M., Van der Veen, J., Van de Ven, A., van Baalen, S., Klaassen, R., & Boon, M. (2020) · Journal of Engineering Education · doi:10.1002/jee.20347 · Cited by 391
Barriers and enablers that influence sustainable interprofessional education: a literature review
Lawlis, T. R., Anson, J., & Greenfield, D. (2014) · Journal of Interprofessional Care · doi:10.3109/13561820.2014.895977 · Cited by 302
Integrating environmental sustainability into universities
Ralph, M., & Stubbs, W. (2014) · Higher Education · doi:10.1007/s10734-013-9641-9 · Cited by 275
An approach to the implementation of sustainability practices in Spanish universities
Larrán Jorge, M., Herrera Madueño, J., Calzado Cejas, M. Y., & Andrades Peña, F. J. (2015) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.07.035 · Cited by 207
Metadata
- Authors
- Ferrer‐Balas, D., Adachi, J., Banas, S., Davidson, C. I., Hoshikoshi, A., Mishra, A., Motodoa, Y., Onga, M., & Ostwald, M.
- Venue
- International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2008-07-11
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 295-316
- ISSN
- 1467-6370 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2055654193
- Cited by
- 382
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 32.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An international comparative analysis of sustainability transformation across seven universities. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/14676370810885907
- The paper
- Ferrer‐Balas, D., Adachi, J., Banas, S., Davidson, C. I., Hoshikoshi, A., Mishra, A., Motodoa, Y., Onga, M., & Ostwald, M. (2008). An international comparative analysis of sustainability transformation across seven universities. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1108/14676370810885907
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.