Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 272

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A conceptual model of trust in the online environment

Salo, Jari, Karjaluoto, Heikki·2007·Online Information Review

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to show that trust is an important factor for successful online transactions. Although the importance of trust has been examined from various perspectives, the studies on online trust have been fragmented in nature and are still in their infancy. Design/methodology/approach: This paper explores factors that affect the formation of end‐user trust in online environments. The study proposes a conceptual framework, which categorises the affecting elements under internal and external factors affecting end‐user trust formation. Findings: The results suggest that the actual outcome of trust‐enhancing methods in online environments should be the development of long‐term trusted customer relationships. Research limitations/implications: More empirical research efforts need to be directed to study trust in online environments. This study is conceptual and qualitative in nature, which is its main limitation. Practical implications: Companies operating in the online environment should focus their attention on the trust formation process and its management as well as creating and managing their relationships with important third parties. Originality/value: The study is significant for two reasons. First, it synthesises online trust literature and, second, it presents an integrative trust model.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/14684520710832324

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 14 references

Cited by

See all 272

Metadata

Authors
Salo, J., & Karjaluoto, H.
Venue
Online Information Review
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2007-10-02
Volume
31
Issue
5
Pages
604-621
ISSN
1468-4527 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2093848542
Cited by
272
References
14
FWCI
13.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A conceptual model of trust in the online environment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/14684520710832324
The paper
Salo, J., & Karjaluoto, H. (2007). A conceptual model of trust in the online environment. Online Information Review. https://doi.org/10.1108/14684520710832324

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.