Cited by 1,688Digital Marketing and Social MediaDiverse Aspects of Tourism ResearchConsumer Behavior and Marketing Influence

The impact of online reviews on hotel booking intentions and perception of trust

Open access
Sparks, Beverley A., Browning, Victoria·2011·Tourism Management

Verified 2026-10-06 · 4 references not checked yet

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tourman.2010.12.011

Cites

72 of 76 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

22 tests recomputed · 1 with the reported and recomputed p on opposite sides of .05

Claims the paper makes

0 of 36 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingown data
    § Abstract

    Consumers are more influenced by negative information encountered early, particularly when the overall review set is negative.

    “Consumers seem to be more influenced by early negative information, especially when the overall set of reviews is negative.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The order manipulation, placing two positive or two negative reviews first, successfully creates the intended framing without a separate manipulation check.
  • Findingown data
    § Abstract

    Trust is higher when a positively framed review set focuses on interpersonal service.

    “Higher levels of trust are also evident when a positively framed set of reviews focused on interpersonal service.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The order manipulation, placing two positive or two negative reviews first, successfully creates the intended framing without a separate manipulation check.
  • Findingown data
    § 4.2.1: Booking intentions

    Within overall poor reviews, framing had a significant effect on booking intention, with positive frame resulting in more favourable booking intention than negative frame.

    “There was a significant effect F(1,519) = 12.74, p < .001for framing on booking intention within the valenced overall poor reviews, with a positively framed review resulting in a more favourable booking intention than a negative framed review (small effect size r = .19).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data
    § 5. Discussion

    Ratings interacted with framing to produce differential effects on booking intentions and trust.

    “However, this characteristic did interact with framing to produce differential effects.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data
    § 4.2.2: Trust in the hotel

    In the positively framed condition, trust was greater when reviews were about customer service rather than core features.

    “For the frame x target interaction (Fig. 3), simple effects tests, F(1,479) = 6.22,p = .013showed that trust was greater when the reviews were about customer service rather than core features within the positively framed condition (small effect size r = .16)”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims. 34
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 30
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 5
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § 4.1 Manipulation checks

    The target manipulation produced a main effect for target but not for valence.

    “This revealed a main effect for target but not valence (see Table 2).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § 4. Results

    No gender or age effects were found for the two dependent variables.

    “we investigated whether there were any gender or age effects for the two dependent variables but none was found.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § Abstract

    A positively framed review set combined with numerical rating details raises both booking intentions and consumer trust.

    “However, positively framed information together with numerical rating details increases both booking intentions and consumer trust.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The order manipulation, placing two positive or two negative reviews first, successfully creates the intended framing without a separate manipulation check.
    • Rests on an assumption: The presence or absence of numerical ratings is a valid manipulation that requires no additional test.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § 4.1 Manipulation checks

    The valence manipulation produced a main effect for valence but not for target.

    “Next, a 2 (valence) x 2 (target) ANOVA on the valence manipulation check item was conducted, which revealed a main effect for valence but not target (see Table 2).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § 4.1 Manipulation checks

    The valence manipulation accounted for 8% of variance and the core target manipulation for 42%.

    “the results reported in Table 2 show a moderate to strong effect size for the manipulations (8% of variance for valence and 42% of variance for core target, respectively)”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data
    § 4. Results

    Past online booking behaviour did not differ significantly by age.

    “Similarly, there was no significant difference in past booking online behaviour by age of respondent.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § 4.2.1: Booking intentions

    Valence had a significant main effect on booking intention, with higher booking intention for positive valence than negative valence.

    “There was a significant main effect associated with the valence manipulation, F(1, 506) = 13.48,p < .001,partial η 2 = .026(small-moderate effect)”
    • Also stated in: § 4.2.1: Booking intentions · plain
      “Ratings of booking intentions were higher in the positive valence (M = 3.81, SD = 1.65) than in the negative valence (M = 3.22, SD = 1.67) condition.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data
    § 4.2.2: Trust in the hotel

    There was a significant frame x rating interaction on trust.

    “Two significant interaction effects were found: frame x target, F(1, 466) = 7.97, p = .005,partial η 2 = .017(small effect); and frame x rating, F(1, 466) = 3.83, p = .051,partial η 2 = .008(small effect).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § 4.2.2: Trust in the hotel

    For the frame x rating interaction on trust, framing had an effect for reviews that included ratings, with higher trust for positive frame than negative frame, but not for reviews without ratings.

    “For the frame x rating interaction (Fig. 4), simple effects tests revealed that framing had an effect for the set of reviews that included ratings F(1,479) = 11.56,p =.001, with higher trust evaluations for the positive frame than the negative frame (small effect size r = .22)but was not significant without ratings F(1,479) = .18,p = .670.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § 5. Discussion

    While there was no main effect for target, there was an interaction between target and frame for trust in the hotel.

    “While there was no main effect for target (core or service), there was an interaction between this variable and frame, for trust in the hotel.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § 4.2.2: Trust in the hotel

    There was no main effect of target or ratings on trust.

    “No main effect was evident for either target (p = .617)or ratings (p = .406).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § 5.1 Practical Implications

    A positive frame increases booking intentions even though the valence is negative.

    “This was demonstrated by an interaction effect between valence and frame that reveals a positive frame increases booking intentions even though the valence is negative.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § 5.1 Practical Implications

    Framing and rating information interact to produce either more positive assessments in the case of a positive frame and ratings or more negative assessments in the case of a negative frame and ratings.

    “That is, framing and rating information interact to produce either more positive assessments in the case of a positive frame and ratings or more negative assessments in the case of a negative frame and ratings.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data
    § 4.2.1: Booking intentions

    Frame had a significant main effect on booking intention, with higher booking intention for positive frame than negative frame.

    “and frame manipulation F(1, 506) = 4.45, p =.035, partial η 2 = .009(small effect)”
    • Also stated in: § 4.2.1: Booking intentions · plain
      “Ratings of booking intentions were higher in the positive frame (M = 3.71, SD = 1.656) than in the negative frame (M = 3.33, SD = 1.69) condition.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data
    § 4.2.2: Trust in the hotel

    Frame had a significant main effect on trust, with higher trust for positive frame than negative frame.

    “and frame manipulation, F(1, 466) = 6.16, p = .013,partial η 2 = .013(small effect)”
    • Also stated in: § 4.2.2: Trust in the hotel · plain
      “Ratings of trust were higher in the positive frame (M = 3.89, SD = 1.28) than in the negative frame (M = 3.58, SD = 1.21) condition.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § about here

    Framing had a significant effect on booking intention for reviews that included ratings, but not for reviews without ratings.

    “Framing had an effect for the set of reviews that included ratings F (1,519) = 11.76,p = 001 (small effect size r = .22)but not for the set of reviews without ratings, F (1,519) = .04,p = .839.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § 4.2.1: Booking intentions

    There was no main effect of target or ratings on booking intention.

    “No main effect was evident for either target (p = .080)or ratings (p = .171).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 2.3 Valence

    Service failures are perceived as losses and receive a more negative weighting from consumers.

    “Furthermore, Smith, Bolton and Wagner (1999) note, service failures are perceived as losses and receive a more negative weighting from a consumer.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Smith, Bolton and Wagner, 1999

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 2.5 Using categorical information for efficiency

    Ratings tend to be quite influential in product choice and provide a short-cut for assessing a product.

    “Ratings tend to be quite influential in product choice (Chen, 2008) and provide potential customers with a short-cut means to assess and evaluate a product (Tsang & Prendergast, 2009).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Chen, 2008

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Tsang & Prendergast, 2009

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 2.2 Core features versus customer service staff issues

    A service offering can be conceptualised as comprising a core and a relational component.

    “A service offering such as legal advice, hotel accommodation, or airline travel can be conceptualised as comprising a core and relational component (Iacobucci & Ostrom, 1993).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Iacobucci & Ostrom, 1993

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationcitation
    § 2.3 Valence

    Predominantly negative reviews will be given more weighting than positive reviews.

    “Similarly, it is argued that predominantly negative reviews will be given more weighting than positive reviews.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationcitation
    § 2.5 Using categorical information for efficiency

    Reliance on easy-to-evaluate information such as general category ratings may have a greater influence on product purchase decisions than more detailed information.

    “Reliance on easy to evaluate information, such as general category ratings (e.g.star ratings for hotels or customer ratings of products) may have a greater influence on product purchase decisions compared with more detailed information.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The presence or absence of numerical ratings is a valid manipulation that requires no additional test.
  • May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.

    Study design and conductown data
    § 4. Results

    No outliers were evident and the assumptions for ANOVA were met.

    “To ensure assumptions of analysis of variance (ANOVA) were met checks for outliers (using standard SPSS explore outlier analysis) were undertaken and none was evident.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 2.4 Framing

    Evaluations are influenced more by what comes first than by what is received subsequently.

    “In justice literature there has been some research that suggests that evaluations are influenced more by what comes first that what is received subsequently (van den Bos, Vermunt & Wilke, 1997).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites van den Bos, Vermunt & Wilke, 1997

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 2.4 Framing

    Evaluations of a target receive higher ratings with positive frames.

    “In a study by Levin (1987), a framing effect was found whereby evaluations of the target received higher ratings with positive frames.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Levin, 1987

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given
    § Dependent, manipulation check and believability variables

    A final online pilot test was undertaken with a small convenience sample.

    “A final online pilot test was undertaken with a small convenience sample and included both fixed choice scale items as well as open ended feedback boxes on all components of the study.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 2.1 Booking intent and perceptions of trust

    Consumer satisfaction in previous interactions with frontline service staff influences cognitive trust.

    “Consumer satisfaction in previous interactions with frontline service staff influences cognitive trust, which is consumer confidence or willingness to trust the service provider in the future (Johnson and Grayson, 2005).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Johnson and Grayson, 2005

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductown data
    § 3. 2 Participants

    Participants were randomly assigned to one of 16 conditions.

    “The sample drawn from an Australian database comprised 554 community members who had been randomly assigned to one of 16 conditions.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductcitation
    § 3.1 Simulation material and manipulation of independent variables

    The final simulated design appeared to have reasonable ecological validity.

    “The final design appeared to have reasonable ecological validity (Viswanathan, 2005), whereby the materials used reflected a realistic web site.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Viswanathan, 2005

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 2.3 Valence

    A grounded theory study revealed a tendency for negative reviews to have more impact than positive reviews.

    “This is consistent with Papathanassis and Knolle's (in press, 2010) grounded theory based study that revealed a tendency for negative reviews to have more impact than positive reviews”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Papathanassis and Knolle, in press, 2010

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 1. Introduction

    A large proportion of travellers use search engines and social media when evaluating a destination.

    “Xiang and Gretzel (2010) report on data that suggest a large proportion of travellers use search engines and social media when evaluating a destination.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Xiang and Gretzel (2010)

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 1. Introduction

    Recommendations from other consumers have more influence on product choice than reviews from expert or firm-related advisors.

    “Chen (2008) found that recommendations of other consumers exerted more influence on product choice than did reviews from expert or firm related advisors.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Chen, 2008

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 2.4 Framing

    Framing influenced respondent service quality evaluations, with positive frames resulting in significantly higher evaluations than the same content presented with a negative frame.

    “Hartman, De Angeli and Sutcliffe (2008), in a study investigating information biases on website quality judgements, found framing influenced respondent service quality evaluations.Positive frames resulted in significantly higher evaluations of service quality than the same content presented with a negative frame.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Hartman, De Angeli and Sutcliffe, 2008

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 2.2 Core features versus customer service staff issues

    Customers often have to enter the service factory, and satisfaction is influenced by both interactions with staff and the standard of service facilities.

    “As one of the seminal writers (Lovelock, 1983) on services marketing argues, customers often have to enter the service factory (e.g.restaurant) and subsequent satisfaction will be influenced by both the interactions with customer service staff and the standard of service facilities.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Lovelock, 1983

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation
    § 2.1 Booking intent and perceptions of trust

    Trust is one of the most important factors in determining whether people will purchase online.

    “They argue that trust is one of the most important factors in determining whether people will purchase online.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Wang and Emurian, 2005

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data
    § 4.1 Manipulation checks

    The treatments affected the manipulation check variables but not the confound variables, demonstrating discriminant validity.

    “Discriminant validity was also demonstrated with the treatments having a significant effect on the manipulation check variables and not on the confound variables.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 2.5 Using categorical information for efficiency

    People tend to be cognitive misers who take shortcuts when making evaluations or decisions.

    “It has been suggested that people tend to be 'cognitive misers' (Fiske & Taylor, 1991), that is, they take short cuts when making evaluations or decisions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Fiske & Taylor, 1991

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation
    § 2.4 Framing

    Information received early, especially if negatively worded, is likely to be more influential on consumer evaluations.

    “In sum, information received early, especially if negatively worded, is likely to be more influential on consumer evaluations.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The order manipulation, placing two positive or two negative reviews first, successfully creates the intended framing without a separate manipulation check.
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation
    § 2.1 Booking intent and perceptions of trust

    Potential consumers use online consumer reviews as one way to reduce risk and uncertainty in the purchase situation.

    “Chen (2008) also argues that potential consumers use online consumer reviews as one way to reduce risk and uncertainty in the purchase situation.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Chen, 2008

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given
    § Dependent, manipulation check and believability variables

    Three pre-tests were applied, with the final one including a think-aloud task.

    “Three pre-tests of this kind were applied with the final one including a 'think aloud' task about the study.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given
    § Dependent, manipulation check and believability variables

    Pre-tests were conducted to develop the stimuli, set manipulation strength, and assess external validity.

    “A series of pre-tests were conducted to develop the stimuli, set the strength of the independent variables and to assess the external validity of the study.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § 2.3 Valence

    Negative information tends to be overemphasised and is more influential in forming impressions.

    “However, research suggests that negative information tends to be over emphasised and is more influential in forming impressions (see Fiske, 1993).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Fiske, 1993

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation
    § 2.5 Using categorical information for efficiency

    In goal-oriented contexts, an easy information processing approach is preferred.

    “Other researchers (van Schaik & Ling, 2009), report that in contexts where the consumer is in a goal oriented mode (e.g.such as making a booking), an easy information processing approach is preferred.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites van Schaik & Ling, 2009

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data
    § 3. 2 Participants

    The sample appeared well matched to the task, though somewhat biased toward females.

    “Thus, the sample seemed well matched to the task, although somewhat biased toward females.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 2.3 Valence

    As the proportion of negative reviews increased, consumer negative attitudes also increased.

    “and Lee, Park and Han's (2008) finding that as the proportion of negative reviews increased so too did consumer negative attitudes.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Lee, Park and Han, 2008

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § 2.2 Core features versus customer service staff issues

    Service targets can be classified as core system features or staff-level customer service events.

    “Broadly, these service targets can be either core system type features (e.g.hotel room poorly designed / maintained /cleaned) or more staff level customer service events (Hoffman & Bateson, 2006;Keaveney, 1995).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Hoffman & Bateson, 2006

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Keaveney, 1995 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning
    § 6. Limitations and future research

    The study employed a simulation of a web site that was professionally designed, which limited what information could be presented and made active.

    “While the study employed a simulation of a web site that was professionally designed, this required a limitation to what information could be presented and made active.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 5. Discussion

    These results lend support to the 'cognitive miser' hypothesis, suggesting that easy-to-access information, in this case frame and rating, is often, but not always, used.

    “These results lend support to the 'cognitive miser' (Fiske & Taylor, 1991) hypothesis, suggesting that easy-to-access information, in this case frame and rating is often, but not always, used.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Fiske & Taylor, 1991

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data
    § about here

    The believability of the simulated task was satisfactory and consistent across conditions.

    “Similarly, the believability of the simulated task was satisfactory and consistent across conditions.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • The quote only partly states this claim.

    Study design and conductown data
    § about here

    The believability scale had acceptable internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = .79).

    “High scores on the scale indicate greater believability in the simulation exercise (Cronbach's alpha for this scale was .79).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data
    § 5.1 Practical Implications

    The paper demonstrated that impressions formed and likely booking intentions are influenced by multiple factors, some of which interact to show simple main effects are not sufficient to understand the tourism consumer.

    “In summary, this paper demonstrated that the impressions formed and likely booking intentions are influenced by multiple factors, some of which interact to show simple main effects are not sufficient to understand the tourism consumer.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data
    § 5.1 Practical Implications

    While core features play an important role in consumer service experience, it is the quality of the interactions with staff that is critical in influencing trust perceptions of the hotel.

    “While core features play an important role in consumer service experience, it is the quality of the interactions with staff that is critical in influencing trust perceptions of the hotel.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § 5. Discussion

    The results are consistent with the proposition that people tend to weight negative information more strongly, with a magnified effect for a negative frame and negative content overall.

    “This is consistent with our proposition that people tend to weight negative information more strongly, with a magnified effect for a negative frame and negative content overall.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data
    § about here

    The manipulation of target and valence was perceived as intended and not confounded.

    “Taken together the manipulation and believability results suggest the manipulation of the independent variables of target and valence were perceived as intended and were not confounded.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data
    § Additional information

    The effect sizes for the significant results were quite small, suggesting the need to investigate other explanatory variables.

    “In the case of our research, the effect sizes for the significant results were quite small thus suggesting the need to investigate other explanatory variables.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning
    § Additional information

    The experimental design is artificial and limits generalization; field investigation may shed further light.

    “We acknowledge that the experimental design is artificial and, as such, further investigation in the field, using other methods, may have the potential to shed further light on the research raised in this paper.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductreasoning
    § 6. Limitations and future research

    The experimental approach limits the investigation to selected variables.

    “While an experimental approach is a strong research design it does limit the investigation to selected variables.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
57 of 57
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The order manipulation, placing two positive or two negative reviews first, successfully creates the intended framing without a separate manipulation check.

    “As framing was operationalised using an order approach (by either placing the first two reviews as negative or positive), no specific manipulation check was sought in the main study.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The presence or absence of numerical ratings is a valid manipulation that requires no additional test.

    “Similarly, consumer numeric ratings were either present or absent on the reviews, therefore no additional tests were needed.”
2 of 2

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Statistics that don’t add up

Each reported p-value recomputed from its test statistic and degrees of freedom.

  • Inconsistent p-value across alpha = .05: F(15, 471) = 783, p = .70

    Major

    The paper reports p = .7 here; recomputing from the test statistic and its degrees of freedom gives p < .001. The two fall on opposite sides of alpha = .05. The check cannot tell whether the statistic or the p-value is the misprint.

    Reported p = .7 · recomputed p < .001

1 of 1

Statistics recomputed

Every reported test result, recomputed from its test statistic and degrees of freedom. A result shows as not adding up only once an independent check has confirmed it.

  • Doesn’t add upF(15, 471) = 783reported p = .7 · recomputed p < .001The two fall on opposite sides of .05

    “F(15, 471) = 783, p = .70”

  • Consistentt(486) = 25.85reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001

    “t(486) = 25.85,p < .001”

  • ConsistentF(1, 506) = 13.48reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001

    “F(1, 506) = 13.48,p < .001”

  • ConsistentF(1, 506) = 4.45reported p = .035 · recomputed p = .035

    “F(1, 506) = 4.45, p = .035”

  • ConsistentF(1, 506) = 4.72reported p = .03 · recomputed p = .030

    “F(1, 506) = 4.72, p = .030”

  • ConsistentF(1, 506) = 5.11reported p = .024 · recomputed p = .024

    “F(1, 506) = 5.11, p = .024”

  • ConsistentF(1, 519) = 21.13reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001

    “F (1,519) = 21.13,p < .001”

  • ConsistentF(1, 519) = 12.74reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001

    “F(1,519) = 12.74, p < .001”

  • ConsistentF(1, 519) = 4.35reported p = .038 · recomputed p = .037

    “F(1,519) = 4.35, p = .038”

  • ConsistentF(1, 519) = 0.04reported p = .839 · recomputed p = .842

    “F (1,519) = .04,p = .839”

  • ConsistentF(1, 466) = 6.17reported p = .013 · recomputed p = .013

    “F(1, 466) = 6.17, p = .013”

  • ConsistentF(1, 466) = 6.16reported p = .013 · recomputed p = .013

    “F(1, 466) = 6.16, p = .013”

  • ConsistentF(1, 466) = 7.97reported p = .005 · recomputed p = .005

    “F(1, 466) = 7.97, p = .005”

  • ConsistentF(1, 466) = 3.83reported p = .051 · recomputed p = .051

    “F(1, 466) = 3.83, p = .051”

  • ConsistentF(1, 479) = 6.22reported p = .013 · recomputed p = .013

    “F(1,479) = 6.22,p = .013”

  • ConsistentF(1, 479) = 0.89reported p = .346 · recomputed p = .346

    “F(1,479) = .89,p = .346”

  • ConsistentF(1, 479) = 14.12reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001

    “F(1,479) = 14.12, p < .001”

  • ConsistentF(1, 479) = 0.04reported p = .835 · recomputed p = .842

    “F(1,479) = .04,p = .835”

  • ConsistentF(1, 479) = 11.56reported p = .001 · recomputed p < .001

    “F(1,479) = 11.56,p = .001”

  • ConsistentF(1, 479) = 0.18reported p = .67 · recomputed p = .672

    “F(1,479) = .18,p = .670”

  • ConsistentF(1, 479) = 1.71reported p = .192 · recomputed p = .192

    “F(1,479) = 1.71, p = .192”

  • ConsistentF(1, 479) = 2.86reported p = .091 · recomputed p = .091

    “F(1,479) = 2.86, p = .091”

22 of 22

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Appendix description gives the wrong number of conditions

    Minor

    The appendix description says there were 12 conditions, whereas the study design and stimulus description both specify 16.

1 of 1

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Hart, 2006, Internet inferno, Marketing Management, 15, 18

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sparks, B. A., & Browning, V.
Affiliations
  • Griffith University (AU)
  • Queensland University of Technology (AU)
Corresponding author
Sparks, Beverley A.
Venue
Tourism Management
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-12
Volume
32
Issue
6
Pages
1310-1323
ISSN
0261-5177 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1991622328
Cited by
1,688
References
76
Citations by year
2026: 159 · 2025: 136 · 2024: 105 · 2023: 142 · 2022: 140 · 2021: 150 · 2020: 158 · 2019: 157 · 2018: 119 · 2017: 112 · 2016: 107 · 2015: 85 · 2014: 52 · 2013: 47 · 2012: 15
FWCI
117.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Tourism Management (publishedVersion)
  • QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion)
Funders
Griffith University
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Marketing and Social Media
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Diverse Aspects of Tourism Research
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Behavior and Marketing Influence
Keywords
online reviews, hotel booking intention, consumer trust, electronic word of mouth, review valence, numerical ratings, interpersonal service, consumer choice, information processing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-06.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-06.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review