Cited by 206Library Science and Informationscientometrics and bibliometrics researchWeb visibility and informetrics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Google Scholar revisited

Jacsó, Péter·2008·Online Information Review

DOI 10.1108/14684520810866010

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to revisit Google Scholar. Design/methodology/approach: This paper discusses the strengths and weaknesses of Google Scholar. Findings: The Google Books project has given a massive and valuable boost to the already rich and diverse content of Google Scholar. The downside of the growth is that significant gaps remain for top ranking journals and serials, and the number of duplicate, triplicate and quadruplicate records for the same source documents (which Google Scholar cannot detect reliably) has increased. Originality/value: This paper discusses the strengths and weaknesses of Google Scholar.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/14684520810866010

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Comparing alternatives to the web of science for coverage of the social sciences’ literature
Norris, M., & Oppenheim, C. (2007) · Journal of Informetrics · doi:10.1016/j.joi.2006.12.001 · Cited by 733
Google Scholar: the pros and the cons
Jacsó, P. (2005) · Online Information Review · doi:10.1108/14684520510598066 · Cited by 383 · cited 5×
“…2006; Haya et al., 2007; Herrera, 2007), citation-enhanced databases such as Web of Science and/or Scopus (Bauer and Bakkalbasi, 2005; Jacsó, 2005b; Jacsó, 2005c; Yang and Meho, 2006; Norris and Oppenheim, 2007), or with a mix of these and traditional scholarly indexing/abstracting databases…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citation
Google Scholar: The New Generation of Citation Indexes
Noruzi, A. (2005) · Libri · doi:10.1515/libr.2005.170 · Cited by 292
Citation Analysis: A Comparison of Google Scholar, Scopus, and Web of Science
Yang, K., & Meho, L. I. (2006) · Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/meet.14504301185 · Cited by 285
An Examination of Citation Counts in a New Scholarly Communication Environment
Bauer, K., & Bakkalbasi, N. (2005) · D-Lib Magazine · doi:10.1045/september2005-bauer · Cited by 215
Comparing test searches in PubMed and Google Scholar
Shultz, M. (2007) · Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA · doi:10.3163/1536-5050.95.4.442 · Cited by 174
Google Scholar coverage of a multidisciplinary field
Walters, W. H. (2006) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2006.08.006 · Cited by 157
The Depth and Breadth of Google Scholar: An Empirical Study
Neuhaus, C., Neuhaus, E., Asher, A., & Wrede, C. (2006) · portal: Libraries and the Academy · doi:10.1353/pla.2006.0026 · Cited by 156
Running with the Devil
Walser, R., & Berger, H. M. (1993) · Cited by 107
An exploratory study of Google Scholar
Mayr, P., & Walter, A. (2007) · Online Information Review · doi:10.1108/14684520710841784 · Cited by 101

Show all 44 references

Research works printed but not linked: 12

Abram, S. (2005), “Google Scholar: thin edge of the wedge?”, Information Outlook, Vol. 9 No. 1, pp. 44‐6, available at: www.sirsi.com/Pdfs/Company/Abram/StephenAbram_GoogleScholarThinEdge.pdf.
Felter, L.M. (2005), “The better mousetrap: Google Scholar”, Scirus, and the Scholarly Search Revolution, Searcher, Vol. 13 No. 2, pp. 43‐8.
Grogg, J.E. and Ferguson, C.L. (2005), “OpenURL linking with Google Scholar”, Searcher, Vol. 13 No. 9, pp. 39‐46.
Hamaker, C. and Spry, B. (2006), “Key issues – Google Scholar”, Serials, pp. 9‐11.
Jacsó, P. (2005b), “As we may search ‐ comparison of major features of the Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar citation‐based and citation‐enhanced databases”, Current Science, Vol. 89 No. 9, pp. 1537‐47, available at: www.ias.ac.in/currsci/nov102005/1537.pdf.
Myhill, M. (2005), “Google Scholar”, Charleston Advisor, Vol. 6 No. 4.
Notess, G.R. (2005), “Scholarly web searching: Google Scholar and Scirus”, Online, Vol. 29 No. 4, pp. 39‐41.
O'Leary, M. (2005), “Google Scholar: what's in it for you?”, Information Today, Vol. 22 No. 7, pp. 35‐9.
Price, G. (2005), “Google Scholar is now open to all libraries”, Search Engine Journal, available at: www.searchenginejournal.com/oogle‐scholar‐is‐now‐open‐to‐all‐libraries/1694/.
Tenopir, C. (2005) Vol. 32, “Google in the academic library: undergraduates may find all they want on Google Scholar”, Library Journal, 1 February, p. 32, available at: www.libraryjournal.com/article/CA498868.html.
Vine, R. (2006), “Google Scholar”, Journal of Medical Library Association, Vol. 94 No. 1, pp. 97‐9, available at: www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=1324783.
Wleklinski, J.M. (2005), “Studying Google Scholar: wall to wall coverage?”, Online, Vol. 29 No. 3, pp. 22‐6.

Sorted by citations

Which academic search systems are suitable for systematic reviews or meta‐analyses? Evaluating retrieval qualities of Google Scholar, PubMed, and 26 other resources
Gusenbauer, M., & Haddaway, N. R. (2020) · Research Synthesis Methods · doi:10.1002/jrsm.1378 · Cited by 2,379
A Review of Theory and Practice in Scientometrics
Mingers, J., & Leydesdorff, L. (2015) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2015.04.002 · Cited by 1,002
Google Scholar to Overshadow Them All? Comparing the Sizes of 12 Academic Search Engines and Bibliographic Databases
Gusenbauer, M. (2019) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-018-2958-5 · Cited by 687
Virtual and remote labs in education: A bibliometric analysis
Heradio, R., de la Torre, L., Galán, D., Cabrerizo, F. J., Herrera‐Viedma, E., & Dormido, S. (2016) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2016.03.010 · Cited by 651
The Use of Bibliometrics to Measure Research Performance in Education Sciences
Diem, A., & Wolter, S. C. (2012) · Research in Higher Education · doi:10.1007/s11162-012-9264-5 · Cited by 338
Is Google Scholar useful for bibliometrics? A webometric analysis
Aguillo, I. F. (2011) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-011-0582-8 · Cited by 302
Web of Science, Scopus and Google Scholar: A content comprehensiveness comparison
S. Adriaanse, L., & Rensleigh, C. (2013) · The Electronic Library · doi:10.1108/el-12-2011-0174 · Cited by 284
The expansion of Google Scholar versus Web of Science: a longitudinal study
de Winter, J., ZADPOOR, A. A., & Dodou, D. (2013) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-013-1089-2 · Cited by 275
Citations to the “Introduction to informetrics” indexed by WOS, Scopus and Google Scholar
Bar‐Ilan, J. (2010) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-010-0185-9 · Cited by 272
History, Evolution and Future of Big Data and Analytics: A Bibliometric Analysis of Its Relationship to Performance in Organizations
Batistič, S., & van der Laken, P. A. (2019) · British Journal of Management · doi:10.1111/1467-8551.12340 · Cited by 247
Defrosting the Digital Library: Bibliographic Tools for the Next Generation Web
Hull, D., Pettifer, S. R., & Kell, D. B. (2008) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000204 · Cited by 209
Examining Grow Your Own Programs Across the Teacher Development Continuum: Mining Research on Teachers of Color and Nontraditional Educator Pipelines
Gist, C. D., Bianco, M., & Lynn, M. (2019) · Journal of Teacher Education · doi:10.1177/0022487118787504 · Cited by 209
Methods for estimating the size of Google Scholar
Orduña‐Malea, E., Ayllón, J. M., Martín‐Martín, A., & López‐Cózar, E. D. (2015) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-015-1614-6 · Cited by 147
Just how multi-level is leadership research? A document co-citation analysis 1980–2013 on leadership constructs and outcomes
Batistič, S., Černe, M., & Vogel, B. (2016) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2016.10.007 · Cited by 149
Metadata mega mess in Google Scholar
Jacsó, P. (2010) · Online Information Review · doi:10.1108/14684521011024191 · Cited by 143
Self-citation
Google Scholar as a Data Source for Research Assessment
López‐Cózar, E. D., Orduña‐Malea, E., & Martín‐Martín, A. (2019) · Springer handbooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-02511-3_4 · Cited by 172
The pros and cons of computing the h‐index using Google Scholar
Jacsó, P. (2008) · Online Information Review · doi:10.1108/14684520810889718 · Cited by 122
Self-citation
Testing the Calculation of a Realistic h -index in Google Scholar, Scopus, and Web of Science for F. W. Lancaster
Jacsó, P. (2008) · Library trends · doi:10.1353/lib.0.0011 · Cited by 104
Self-citation
Accuracy and completeness of publication and citation records in the Web of Science, PsycINFO, and Google Scholar: A case study for the computation of h indices in Psychology
García‐Pérez, M. A. (2010) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.21372 · Cited by 101
Ranking marketing journals using the Google Scholar-based hg-index
Moussa, S., & Touzani, M. (2009) · Journal of Informetrics · doi:10.1016/j.joi.2009.10.001 · Cited by 97
Enabling the language of accessible tourism
Gillovic, B., McIntosh, A. J., Darcy, S., & Cockburn‐Wootten, C. (2018) · Journal of Sustainable Tourism · doi:10.1080/09669582.2017.1377209 · Cited by 98
Open access and sources of full-text articles in Google Scholar in different subject fields
Jamali, H. R., & Nabavi, M. (2015) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-015-1642-2 · Cited by 90
A bibliometric analysis of 20 years of research on software product lines
Heradio, R., Perez-Morago, H., Fernández-Amorós, D., Cabrerizo, F. J., & Herrera‐Viedma, E. (2015) · Information and Software Technology · doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2015.11.004 · Cited by 89
Citizen science participation in research in the environmental sciences: key factors related to projects’ success and longevity
Cunha, D. G. F., MARQUES, J. F., de Resende, J. C., de Falco, P. B., SOUZA, C. M. D., & Loiselle, S. (2017) · Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências · doi:10.1590/0001-3765201720160548 · Cited by 88
Google Scholar compared to Web of Science. A Literature Review
Mikki, S. (2009) · Nordic Journal of Information Literacy in Higher Education · doi:10.15845/noril.v1i1.10 · Cited by 82
Calculating the h‐index and other bibliometric and scientometric indicators from Google Scholar with the Publish or Perish software
Jacsó, P. (2009) · Online Information Review · doi:10.1108/14684520911011070 · Cited by 82
Self-citation
Web indicators for research evaluation. Part 1: Citations and links to academic articles from the Web
Thelwall, M. A., & Kousha, K. (2015) · El Profesional de la Informacion · doi:10.3145/epi.2015.sep.08 · Cited by 78
Investigating Salesperson Performance Factors: A Systematic Review of the Literature on the Characteristics of Effective Salespersons
Herjanto, H., & Franklin, D. (2019) · Australasian Marketing Journal (AMJ) · doi:10.1016/j.ausmj.2018.12.001 · Cited by 89
Environmental and ecological economics in the 21st century: An age adjusted citation analysis of the influential articles, journals, authors and institutions
Hoepner, A. G. F., Kant, B., Scholtens, B., & Yu, P.-S. (2012) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.03.002 · Cited by 75
Search engines and the production of academic knowledge
van Dijck, J. (2010) · International Journal of Cultural Studies · doi:10.1177/1367877910376582 · Cited by 71
Requirements Engineering for Product Service Systems
Berkovich, M., Leimeister, J. M., & Krcmar, H. (2011) · Business & Information Systems Engineering · doi:10.1007/s12599-011-0192-2 · Cited by 75
A comparative analysis of social sciences citation tools
Levine‐Clark, M., & Gil, E. L. (2009) · Online Information Review · doi:10.1108/14684520911001954 · Cited by 71
Research on 'Responsible Investment': An Influential Literature Analysis Comprising a Rating, Characterisation, Categorisation and InvestigationPreprint
Hoepner, A. G. F., & McMillan, D. G. (2009) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1454793 · Cited by 74
A surge of p -values between 0.041 and 0.049 in recent decades (but negative results are increasing rapidly too)
de Winter, J. C., & Dodou, D. (2015) · PeerJ · doi:10.7717/peerj.733 · Cited by 78
Where Is International Relations Going? Evidence from Graduate Training
Colgan, J. D. (2016) · International Studies Quarterly · doi:10.1093/isq/sqv017 · Cited by 70
The pros and cons of computing the h‐index using Web of Science
Jacsó, P. (2008) · Online Information Review · doi:10.1108/14684520810914043 · Cited by 65
Self-citation
Finding open access articles using Google, Google Scholar, OAIster and OpenDOAR
Norris, M. W., Oppenheim, C., & Rowland, F. (2008) · Online Information Review · doi:10.1108/14684520810923881 · Cited by 63
E-BUSINESS ADOPTION RESEARCH: STATE OF THE ART
Chen, L., & Holsapple, C. W. (2013) · UKnowledge (University of Kentucky) · Cited by 57
M icrosoft academic search and G oogle scholar citations: Comparative analysis of author profiles
Ortega, J. L., & Aguillo, I. F. (2014) · Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.23036 · Cited by 56
Scientometric analysis of scientific publications in CSCW
Correia, A., Paredes, H., & Fonseca, B. (2017) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-017-2562-0 · Cited by 57
Google Scholar como una fuente de evaluación científica: una revisión bibliográfica sobre errores de la base de datos
Orduña‐Malea, E., Martín‐Martín, A., & López‐Cózar, E. D. (2017) · Revista española de Documentación Científica · doi:10.3989/redc.2017.4.1500 · Cited by 65
Open-Source Hardware in Education: A Systematic Mapping Study
Heradio, R., Chacón, J., Vargas, H., Galán, D., Sàenz, J., de la Torre, L., & Dormido, S. (2018) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2018.2881929 · Cited by 55
Using Conventional Bibliographic Databases for Social Science Research: Web of Science and Scopus are not the Only Options
Wilder, E. I., & Walters, W. H. (2021) · Scholarly Assessment Reports · doi:10.29024/sar.36 · Cited by 58
Comparative Recall and Precision of Simple and Expert Searches in Google Scholar and Eight Other Databases
Walters, W. H. (2011) · portal Libraries and the Academy · doi:10.1353/pla.2011.0042 · Cited by 51
About the size of Google Scholar: playing the numbersPreprint
Orduña‐Malea, E., Ayllón, J. M., Martín‐Martín, A., & López‐Cózar, E. D. (2014) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1407.6239 · Cited by 51
Analysis of Academic Databases for Literature Review in the Computer Science Education Field
Valente, A. S. O., de Holanda, M. T., Mariano, A. M., Furuta, R. K., & Silva, D. D. (2022) · IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) · doi:10.1109/fie56618.2022.9962393 · Cited by 61
The harvest of wildlife for bushmeat and traditional medicine in East, South and Southeast Asia: Current knowledge base, challenges, opportunities and areas for future research
Lee, T., Sigouin, A., Pinedo-Vasquez, M., & Nasi, R. (2014) · Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR) eBooks · doi:10.17528/cifor/005135 · Cited by 58
Google Scholar como herramienta para la evaluación científica
Torres‐Salinas, D., Ruíz-Pérez, R., & López‐Cózar, E. D. (2009) · El Profesional de la Informacion · doi:10.3145/epi.2009.sep.03 · Cited by 50
Untangling the web of e-Research: Towards a sociology of online knowledge
Meyer, E. T., & Schroeder, R. (2009) · Journal of Informetrics · doi:10.1016/j.joi.2009.03.006 · Cited by 48
Digital Library Research in Action: Supporting Information Retrieval in Sowiport
Hienert, D., Sawitzki, F., & Mayr, P. (2015) · D-Lib Magazine · doi:10.1045/march2015-hienert · Cited by 46
Google Scholar Metrics: an unreliable tool for assessing scientific journals
López‐Cózar, E. D., & Cabezas-Clavijo, Á. (2012) · El Profesional de la Informacion · doi:10.3145/epi.2012.jul.15 · Cited by 45
THE INCREASING PHENOMENON OF SECOND-HAND CLOTHES PURCHASE: INSIGHTS FROM THE LITERATURE
Herjanto, H., Scheller-Sampson, J., & Erickson, E. (2016) · Jurnal Manajemen dan Kewirausahaan · doi:10.9744/jmk.18.1.1-15 · Cited by 45
Heart failure among Indigenous Australians: a systematic review
Woods, J. A., Katzenellenbogen, J. M., Davidson, P. M., & Thompson, S. (2012) · BMC Cardiovascular Disorders · doi:10.1186/1471-2261-12-99 · Cited by 44
Graduate students appreciate Google Scholar, but still find use for libraries
Wu, M., & Chen, S.-C. (2014) · The Electronic Library · doi:10.1108/el-08-2012-0102 · Cited by 44
Shola habitats on sky islands: status of research on montane forests and grasslands in southern India
Robin, V., & Rajamani, N. (2012) · NOT FOUND REPOSITORY (Indian Institute of Science Bangalore) · Cited by 43
A practice-driven systematic review of dependency analysis solutions
Arias, T. B. C., van der Spek, P., & Avgeriou, P. (2011) · Empirical Software Engineering · doi:10.1007/s10664-011-9158-8 · Cited by 42
Irreproducibility in searches of scientific literature: A comparative analysis
Pozsgai, G., Löveï, G. L., Vasseur, L., Gurr, G. M., Batáry, P., Korponai, J. L., Littlewood, N. A., Liu, J., Móra, A., Obrycki, J. J., et al. (2021) · Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1002/ece3.8154 · Cited by 45
Errors of omission and their implications for computing scientometric measures in evaluating the publishing productivity and impact of countries
Jacsó, P. (2009) · Online Information Review · doi:10.1108/14684520910951276 · Cited by 40
Self-citation
Search engine user behaviour: How can users be guided to quality content?
Lewandowski, D. (2008) · Information Services & Use · doi:10.3233/isu-2008-0583 · Cited by 40
The silent fading of an academic search engine: the case of Microsoft Academic Search
Orduña‐Malea, E., Martín‐Martín, A., Ayllón, J. M., & López‐Cózar, E. D. (2014) · Online Information Review · doi:10.1108/oir-07-2014-0169 · Cited by 40
The Utility of Google Scholar When Searching Geographical Literature: Comparison With Three Commercial Bibliographic Databases
Ştirbu, S., Thirion, P., Schmitz, S., Haesbroeck, G., & Greco, N. (2015) · The Journal of Academic Librarianship · doi:10.1016/j.acalib.2015.02.013 · Cited by 40
Google Scholar duped and deduped – the aura of “robometrics”
Jacsó, P. (2011) · Online Information Review · doi:10.1108/14684521111113632 · Cited by 40
Self-citation
A novel method for depicting academic disciplines through Google Scholar Citations: The case of Bibliometrics
Martín‐Martín, A., Orduña‐Malea, E., & Delgado López-Cózar, E. (2017) · LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) · Cited by 39
Google Scholar Author Citation Tracker: is it too little, too late?
Jacsó, P. (2012) · Online Information Review · doi:10.1108/14684521211209581 · Cited by 38
Self-citation
Library and Information Sciences
Chen, C., & Larsen, R. S. (2014) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-54812-3 · Cited by 50
How is an academic social site populated? A demographic study of Google Scholar Citations population
Ortega, J. L. (2015) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-015-1593-7 · Cited by 35
Google Scholar as a tool for discovering journal articles in library and information science
Lewandowski, D. (2010) · Online Information Review · doi:10.1108/14684521011036972 · Cited by 35
Google Scholar and Web of Science: Examining gender differences in citation coverage across five scientific disciplines
Andersen, J. P., & Nielsen, M. W. (2018) · Journal of Informetrics · doi:10.1016/j.joi.2018.07.010 · Cited by 34
Using Google Scholar for journal impact factors and the h‐index in nationwide publishing assessments in academia – siren songs and air‐raid sirens
Jacsó, P. (2012) · Online Information Review · doi:10.1108/14684521211241503 · Cited by 34
Self-citation
Google Scholar e índice h en biomedicina: la popularización de la evaluación bibliométrica
Cabezas-Clavijo, Á., & López‐Cózar, E. D. (2013) · Medicina Intensiva · doi:10.1016/j.medin.2013.01.008 · Cited by 34
Measuring chain digitisation maturity: an assessment of Dutch retail branches
Plomp, M. G. A., & Batenburg, R. S. (2010) · Supply Chain Management An International Journal · doi:10.1108/13598541011039983 · Cited by 34
The counting house: measuring those who count. Presence of Bibliometrics, Scientometrics, Informetrics, Webometrics and Altmetrics in the Google Scholar Citations, ResearcherID, ResearchGate, Mendeley & TwitterPreprint
Martín‐Martín, A., Orduña‐Malea, E., Ayllón, J. M., & López‐Cózar, E. D. (2016) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.13140/rg.2.1.4814.4402 · Cited by 34
Examining the Impact of the National Institutes of Health Public Access Policy on the Citation Rates of Journal Articles
Groote, S. L. D., Shultz, M., & Smalheiser, N. R. (2015) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0139951 · Cited by 32
A novel method for depicting academic disciplines through Google Scholar Citations: The case of Bibliometrics
Martín‐Martín, A., Orduna-Malea, E., & López-Cózar, E. D. (2017) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-017-2587-4 · Cited by 31
The Declining Value of Subscription-based Abstracting and Indexing Services in the New Knowledge Dissemination Era
Chen, X. (2010) · Serials Review · doi:10.1016/j.serrev.2010.02.010 · Cited by 31
Grim tales about the impact factor and the h-index in the Web of Science and the Journal Citation Reports databases: reflections on Vanclay’s criticism
Jacsó, P. (2012) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-012-0769-7 · Cited by 29
Self-citation
Science is all in the eye of the beholder: Keyword maps in Google scholar citations
Ortega, J. L., & Aguillo, I. F. (2012) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.22761 · Cited by 28
Google Scholar and the h-index in biomedicine: The popularization of bibliometric assessment
Cabezas-Clavijo, Á., & López‐Cózar, E. D. (2013) · Medicina Intensiva (English Edition) · doi:10.1016/j.medine.2013.05.002 · Cited by 28
Changes in Scholarly Influence in Major American Criminology and Criminal Justice Journals Between 1986 and 2005
Cohn, E. G. (2011) · Journal of Criminal Justice Education · doi:10.1080/10511253.2011.556134 · Cited by 26
Scholarly Influence in Criminology and Criminal Justice Journals in 1990–2005
Cohn, E. G., & Farrington, D. P. (2012) · Criminal Justice Review · doi:10.1177/0734016812450025 · Cited by 26
A systematic review on halal cosmetic consumption: application of theory method context – attributes decision outcome framework
Herjanto, H., Amin, M., & Karmagatri, M. (2022) · Journal of Islamic accounting and business research · doi:10.1108/jiabr-12-2021-0315 · Cited by 25
Use of Google Scholar in corpus-driven EAP research
Březina, V. (2012) · Journal of English for Academic Purposes · doi:10.1016/j.jeap.2012.08.001 · Cited by 25
Ranking Marketing Journals Using the Search Engine Google Scholar
Touzani, M., & Moussa, S. (2010) · Marketing Education Review · doi:10.2753/mer1052-8008200304 · Cited by 24
A Study on MDE Approaches for Engineering Wireless Sensor Networks
Malavolta, I., & Muccini, H. (2014) · Euromicro Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications (SEAA) · doi:10.1109/seaa.2014.61 · Cited by 24
ANALISIS MESIN PENCARIAN GOOGLE SCHOLAR SEBAGAI SUMBER BARU UNTUK KUTIPAN
Rafika, A. S., Putri, H. Y., & Widiarti, F. D. (2017) · Journal CERITA · doi:10.33050/cerita.v3i2.657 · Cited by 23
Faculty Performance Evaluation Using Citation Analysis
Sanchez, T. W. (2016) · Journal of Planning Education and Research · doi:10.1177/0739456x16633500 · Cited by 23
Requirements Engineering für Product Service Systems
Berkovich, M., Leimeister, J. M., & Krcmar, H. (2011) · WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK · doi:10.1007/s11576-011-0301-3 · Cited by 21
The Open Access Citation Premium May Depend on the Openness and Inclusiveness of the Indexing Database, but the Relationship Is Controversial Because It Is Ambiguous Where the Open Access Boundary Lies
Copiello, S. (2019) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-019-03221-w · Cited by 17
Where Is International Relations Going? Evidence from Graduate Training
Eff, J. (2016) · Cited by 17
GOOGLE ACADÊMICO COMO FERRAMENTA PARA OS ESTUDOS DE CITAÇÕES: Avaliação da Precisão das Buscas por Autor
Caregnato, S. E. (2012) · PontodeAcesso · doi:10.9771/1981-6766rpa.v5i3.5682 · Cited by 17
Journal Article Retrieval in an Age of Open Access: How Journal Indexes Indicate Open Access Articles
Chen, X. (2013) · Journal of Web Librarianship · doi:10.1080/19322909.2013.795426 · Cited by 16
Complications associated with energy‐based devices during thyroidectomy from 2010–2020
Lee, E., Tong, J. Y., Pasick, L. J., Benito, D. A., Joshi, A. S., Thakkar, P., & Goodman, J. (2021) · World Journal of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.wjorl.2021.04.008 · Cited by 16
A new method for testing reproducibility in systematic reviews was developed, but needs more testing
Pieper, D., Heß, S., & Faggion, C. M. (2021) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/s12874-021-01342-6 · Cited by 17
Is Google scholar really scholarly?
Loan, F. A., & Shueb, S. (2018) · Library Hi Tech News · doi:10.1108/lhtn-11-2017-0078 · Cited by 16
Supplementary Report I to the Independent Review of the Role of Metrics in Research Assessment and Management
Wouters, P. F., Thelwall, M. A., Kousha, K., Waltman, L., de Rijcke, S., & Franssen, T. (2015) · Cited by 16
Qualitative Methods Research Through the Internet Applications and Services: The Contribution of Audiovisual Media Technology as Technology-Enhanced Research
Nicolaou, C. (2021) · International Research in Higher Education · doi:10.5430/irhe.v6n1p1 · Cited by 21
Maturing interorganisational information systems
Plomp, M. G. A. (2012) · Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) · Cited by 15
ecancermedicalscience
Warden, R. (2016) · ecancermedicalscience · doi:10.3332/ecancer.2010.203 · Cited by 15
Pemanfaatan Google Scholar Dan Citation Dalam Memenuhi Kebutuhan Pembuatan Skripsi Mahasiswa Pada Perguruan Tinggi
Rahardja, U., Tiara, K., & Rosalinda, I. A. (2016) · Technomedia Journal · doi:10.33050/tmj.v1i1.28 · Cited by 14
Infraestrutura verde: conceitos, tipologias e terminologia no Brasil
dos Santos, M. F. N., & Enokibara, M. (2021) · Paisagem e Ambiente · doi:10.11606/issn.2359-5361.paam.2021.174804 · Cited by 14

Authors: Jacsó, P.
Affiliations: University of Hawaii System (US)
Corresponding author: Jacsó, Péter
ORCID: Jacsó, Péter
Venue: Online Information Review
Publisher: Emerald
Published: 2008-02-22
Volume: 32
Issue: 1
Pages: 102-114
ISSN: 1468-4527 (ISSN-L)
DOI: 10.1108/14684520810866010
OpenAlex: W2102661446
Cited by: 206
References: 44
Citations by year: 2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 18
FWCI: 54.83
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: closed
Licence: www.emerald.com/insight/site-policies (tdm)
Locations: Online Information Review (publishedVersion)
Topics: Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Library Science and Information
Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › scientometrics and bibliometrics research
Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Web visibility and informetrics
Keywords: Google Scholar, Google Books, bibliographic search engines, duplicate records, journal indexing, search engine ranking, full-text search

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Google Scholar revisited

Abstract

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks