The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 51 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Technology acceptance: a meta-analysis of the TAM: part 2
Abstract
Purpose: This paper is the second of two concerned with a meta‐analysis of the technology acceptance model (TAM). This part aims to present a rigorous and quantitative meta‐analytic review of 569 findings from 95 TAM studies as a basis for identifying gaps and providing guidelines for implementation management and conduct of future research. The paper also seeks to investigate the potential impact of methodological characteristics on the meta‐analytic findings. Design/methodology/approach: The approach consists of meta‐analysis following Hedges and Olkin's procedures, moderator‐analysis using homogeneity Q ‐values, analogue to ANOVA and weighted regression method. Findings: The dominant focus in empirical investigations of the TAM has been on modelling intention for its effect on self‐reported usage behaviour, while the attitudinal construct has been neglected. This raises three questions: whether the exclusion of attitude from the TAM is beneficial for understanding of technology usage behaviour in mandatory settings; whether the revised TAM holds equally for mandatory and voluntary settings; and whether the emphasis on measuring intentions and self‐report use rather than actual usage is warranted. An additional question answered in the meta‐analysis is about the relative importance of PU and PEOU. Originality/value: The paper provides a rigorous meta‐analysis to progress towards a unified view of the TAM.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“There is also evidence that how strongly PEOU, or other variables for that matter, is related to attitudes, behavioral intentions, or actual use depends on factors such as subject type and technology type [36].”
From The Technology Acceptance Model: Its past and its future in health care (2010) · cites this paper as [36]
Citations
Cites
The theory of planned behavior
Ajzen, I. (1991) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-t · Cited by 90,587
Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology
Davis, F. D. (1989) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249008 · Cited by 68,483
(1975) · PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation) · Cited by 36,737
Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit
Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1992) · Sociological Methods & Research · doi:10.1177/0049124192021002005 · Cited by 27,200
(1980) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 25,810
User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982 · Cited by 25,709
Wasserman, S. S., Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1988) · Journal of Educational Statistics · doi:10.2307/1164953 · Cited by 10,377
(2000) · Cited by 9,198
Testing Structural Equation Models.
Clogg, C. C., Bollen, K. A., & Long, J. S. (1995) · Social Forces · doi:10.2307/2580595 · Cited by 8,246
Venkatesh, V. (2000) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.11.4.342.11872 · Cited by 6,664
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Cohen, J. (1977), Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioural Science, Revised ed., Academic Press, New York, NY.
- Hedges, L. and Olkin, I. (1985), Statistical Methods for Meta‐analysis, Academic Press, Orlando, FL.
- Rawstorne, P., Jayasuriya, R. and Caputi, P. (2000), “Issues in predicting and explaining usage behaviors with the TAM and the TPB when usage is mandatory”, Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on IS, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia, pp. 35‐44.
- Rosenthal, R. (1994), “Statistically describing and combining studies”, in Cooper, H. and Hedges, L.V. (Eds), The Handbook of Research Synthesis, Sage, New York, NY, pp. 231‐44.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Technology Acceptance Model: Its past and its future in health care
Holden, R. J., & Karsh, B.-T. (2010) · Journal of Biomedical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2009.07.002 · Cited by 2,669
Factors influencing acceptance of technology for aging in place: A systematic review
Peek, S. T. M., Wouters, E. J. M., van Hoof, J., Luijkx, K. G., Boeije, H. R., & Vrijhoef, H. J. M. (2014) · International Journal of Medical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2014.01.004 · Cited by 1,206
The roles of initial trust and perceived risk in public’s acceptance of automated vehicles
Zhang, T., Tao, D., Qu, X., Zhang, X. Y., Lin, R., & Zhang, W. (2018) · Transportation Research Part C Emerging Technologies · doi:10.1016/j.trc.2018.11.018 · Cited by 900
A meta-analysis of mobile commerce adoption and the moderating effect of culture
Zhang, L., Zhu, J., & Liu, Q. (2012) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2012.05.008 · Cited by 541
Yousafzai, S., Foxall, G. R., & Pallister, J. (2010) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2010.00615.x · Cited by 559
Self-citationRese, A., Baier, D., Geyer-Schulz, A., & Schreiber, S. (2016) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2016.10.010 · Cited by 535
Automated vehicle acceptance in China: Social influence and initial trust are key determinants
Zhang, T., Tao, D., Qu, X., Zhang, X. Y., Zeng, J., Zhu, H.-Y., & Han, Z. (2020) · Transportation Research Part C Emerging Technologies · doi:10.1016/j.trc.2020.01.027 · Cited by 495
Chung, J. E., Park, N., Wang, H., Fulk, J. L., & McLaughlin, M. L. (2010) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.06.016 · Cited by 465
Wu, K., Zhao, Y. C., Zhu, Q., Tan, X., & Zheng, H. (2011) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2011.03.004 · Cited by 399
The imperative of influencing citizen attitude toward e-government adoption and use
Hujran, O., Al‐Debei, M. M., Chatfield, A. T., & Migdadi, M. M. (2015) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.06.025 · Cited by 429
Hertzum (2017) · doi:10.1145/3127358 · Cited by 307
Unpacking teachers’ intentions to integrate technology: A meta-analysis
Scherer, R., & Teo, T. P. (2019) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2019.03.001 · Cited by 399
Saif, N., Khan, S. U., Shaheen, I., ALotaibi, F. A., Alnfiai, M. M., & Arif, M. (2024) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2023.108097 · Cited by 301
Tarhini, A., HONE, K. S., & Liu, X. (2014) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.09.020 · Cited by 285
Güner, H., & Acartürk, C. (2018) · Universal Access in the Information Society · doi:10.1007/s10209-018-0642-4 · Cited by 291
Why Would I Use This in My Home? A Model of Domestic Social Robot Acceptance
de Graaf, M. M. A., Allouch, S. B., & van Dijk, J. A. G. M. (2017) · Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/07370024.2017.1312406 · Cited by 272
A comparison of the different versions of popular technology acceptance models
Cataluña, F. J. R., Arenas-Gaitán, J., & Ramírez-Correa, P. (2015) · Kybernetes · doi:10.1108/k-09-2014-0184 · Cited by 246
Teo, T. P., & Zhou, M. (2014) · Journal of Computing in Higher Education · doi:10.1007/s12528-014-9080-3 · Cited by 241
Tao, D., Wang, T., Wang, T., Zhang, T., Zhang, X., & Qu, X. (2019) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2019.09.023 · Cited by 236
What influences college students to continue using business simulation games? The Taiwan experience
Tao, Y., Cheng, C.-J., & Sun, S. (2009) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.05.009 · Cited by 223
Schoonenboom, J. (2013) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2013.09.016 · Cited by 180
Howard, R. G., Restrepo, L., & Chang, C. (2016) · International Journal of Project Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.10.012 · Cited by 191
Trust and risk in consumer acceptance of e-services
Mou, J., Shin, D., & Cohen, J. F. (2015) · Electronic Commerce Research · doi:10.1007/s10660-015-9205-4 · Cited by 192
Chiu, W., & Cho, H. (2020) · Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics · doi:10.1108/apjml-09-2019-0534 · Cited by 172
e-Shopping acceptance: A qualitative and meta-analytic review
Ingham, J., Cadieux, J., & Berrada, A. M. (2014) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2014.10.002 · Cited by 170
John, S. P. (2015) · Contaduría y Administración · doi:10.1016/j.cya.2015.08.004 · Cited by 177
Employing the technology acceptance model in social media: A systematic review
Al-Qaysi, N., Nordin, N. M., & Al‐Emran, M. (2020) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-020-10197-1 · Cited by 199
User response to mandatory IT use: a coping theory perspective
Bhattacherjee, A., Davis, C. J., Connolly, A. J., & Hikmet, N. (2017) · European Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.1057/s41303-017-0047-0 · Cited by 189
Too old for technology? Stereotype threat and technology use by older adults
Mariano, J., Marques, S., Ramos, M. R., Gerardo, F., da Cunha, C. L., Girenko, A., Alexandersson, J., Stree, B., Lamanna, M., Lorenzatto, M., et al. (2021) · Behaviour and Information Technology · doi:10.1080/0144929x.2021.1882577 · Cited by 196
Investigating the drivers of internet banking adoption decision
Gounaris, S. P., & Koritos, C. (2008) · International Journal of Bank Marketing · doi:10.1108/02652320810894370 · Cited by 160
The effect of motivation on trust in the acceptance of internet banking in a low income country
Akhlaq, A., & Ahmed, E. (2013) · International Journal of Bank Marketing · doi:10.1108/02652321311298690 · Cited by 154
Understanding business-level innovation technology adoption
Yu, C., & Tao, Y. (2008) · Technovation · doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2008.07.007 · Cited by 158
Gbongli, K., Xu, Y., & Amedjonekou, K. M. (2019) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su11133639 · Cited by 166
Adopting autonomous vehicles: The moderating effects of demographic variables
Park, J., Hong, E., & Le, H. T. P. M. (2021) · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services · doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2021.102687 · Cited by 159
The Role of Emotional Intelligence and Self-efficacy in EFL Teachers’ Technology Adoption
Zhi, R., Wang, Y., & Wang, Y. (2023) · The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher · doi:10.1007/s40299-023-00782-6 · Cited by 132
Won, D., Chiu, W., & Byun, H. (2022) · Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics · doi:10.1108/apjml-09-2021-0709 · Cited by 163
Rosli, M. S., Saleh, N. S., Md. Ali, A., Abu Bakar, S., & Mohd Tahir, L. (2022) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su141811389 · Cited by 126
Tarhini, A., Elyas, T., Akour, M. A., & Al-Salti, Z. S. (2016) · Higher Education Studies · doi:10.5539/hes.v6n3p72 · Cited by 123
Chaouali, W., Souiden, N., & Ladhari, R. (2016) · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services · doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2016.11.009 · Cited by 122
E. Koh, C., R. Prybutok, V., D. Ryan, S., & Andy" Wu, Y. (2010) · Informing Science: The International Journal of an Emerging Transdiscipline · doi:10.28945/1326 · Cited by 120
The Technology Integration Model (TIM). Predicting the continued use of technology
Shaw, H., Ellis, D. A., & Ziegler, F. V. (2018) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2018.02.001 · Cited by 110
Jun, K., Yoon, B., Lee, S., & Lee, D.-S. (2021) · Foods · doi:10.3390/foods11010064 · Cited by 128
Elderly Persons and Internet Use
Ramón-Jerónimo, M. Á., Peral, B. P., & Arenas-Gaitán, J. (2013) · Social Science Computer Review · doi:10.1177/0894439312473421 · Cited by 117
Conditional Determinants of Mobile Phones Penetration and Mobile Banking in Sub-Saharan Africa
Asongu, S. A. (2015) · Journal of the Knowledge Economy · doi:10.1007/s13132-015-0322-z · Cited by 137
Al-Smadi, M. O., Ibn, M., & Islamic, S. (2012) · Cited by 97
Buying an electric car: A rational choice or a norm-directed behavior?
Bobeth, S., & Kastner, I. (2020) · Transportation Research Part F Traffic Psychology and Behaviour · doi:10.1016/j.trf.2020.06.009 · Cited by 103
Teo, T. P. (2014) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2014.917110 · Cited by 92
Determinants of customers' intentions to use hedonic networks: The case of Instagram
Bahri-Ammari, N., Hadhri, W., & Mezrani, M. (2018) · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services · doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2018.09.001 · Cited by 101
Davies, R., & Harty, C. F. (2013) · Construction Management and Economics · doi:10.1080/01446193.2013.848994 · Cited by 89
Mardiana, S., Tjakraatmadja, J. H., & Aprianingsih, A. (2015) · International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues · Cited by 88
Factors affecting camera mobile phone adoption before e-shopping in the Arab world
Rouibah, K., Abbas, H. A., & Rouibah, S. (2011) · Technology in Society · doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2011.10.001 · Cited by 87
Understanding Online Community Participation
Wang, H., Chung, J. E., Park, N., McLaughlin, M. L., & Fulk, J. L. (2011) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/0093650211408593 · Cited by 85
Podcasting acceptance on campus: The differing perspectives of teachers and students
Lin, S., Zimmer, J. C., & Lee, V. (2013) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2013.06.003 · Cited by 86
Zhang, C., Hu, M., Wu, W., Kamran, F., & Wang, X. (2024) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-024-12905-7 · Cited by 102
Tarhini, A., Hassouna, M., Abbasi, D. M. S., & Orozco, J. (2015) · The Electronic Journal of e-Learning · Cited by 79
The use of smart work in government: Empirical analysis of Korean experiences
Eom, S.-J., Nakbum, C., & Sung, W. (2016) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2016.01.005 · Cited by 77
Ali, I., Warraich, N. F., & Butt, K. (2024) · Information Development · doi:10.1177/02666669241257206 · Cited by 94
Razmak, J., & Bélanger, C. H. (2018) · Information Technology and People · doi:10.1108/itp-07-2016-0160 · Cited by 76
Video Game Acceptance: A Meta-Analysis of the Extended Technology Acceptance Model
Wang, X.-H., & Goh, D. (2017) · Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking · doi:10.1089/cyber.2017.0086 · Cited by 60
Wang, H., Zhang, J., Luximon, Y., Qin, M., Geng, P., & Tao, D. (2022) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph191710758 · Cited by 79
Peek, S., Luijkx, K., Vrijhoef, H., Nieboer, M., Aarts, S., van der Voort, C. S., Rijnaard, M. D., & Wouters, E. (2017) · BMC Geriatrics · doi:10.1186/s12877-017-0582-5 · Cited by 65
Thüs, D., Malone, S., & Brünken, R. (2024) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1474892 · Cited by 96
Factors influencing intention to adopt ICT among intensive shrimp farmers
Ulhaq, I., Ngọc, P. T. Á., Le, V. H., Pham, H., & Le, T. C. (2021) · Aquaculture · doi:10.1016/j.aquaculture.2021.737407 · Cited by 76
Technology rejection: the case of the wallet phone
Swilley, E. (2010) · Journal of Consumer Marketing · doi:10.1108/07363761011052341 · Cited by 70
Role played by social factors and privacy concerns in autonomous vehicle adoption
Ljubi, K., & Groznik, A. (2022) · Transport Policy · doi:10.1016/j.tranpol.2022.12.013 · Cited by 70
Acceptance of autonomous delivery robots in urban cities
Yuen, K., Koh, L., Anwar, M. H. D. B., & Wang, X.-Q. (2022) · Cities · doi:10.1016/j.cities.2022.104056 · Cited by 57
Mardiana, S., Tjakraatmadja, J., & Aprianingsih, A. (2015) · Procedia Computer Science · doi:10.1016/j.procs.2015.12.150 · Cited by 58
Understanding the perception towards using mHealth applications in practice
Sezgın, E., Özkan, S., & Yıldırım, S. (2016) · Information Development · doi:10.1177/0266666916684180 · Cited by 59
Consumer acceptance of self-service technologies in fashion retail stores
Park, J., Ha, S., & Jeong, S. W. (2020) · Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management · doi:10.1108/jfmm-09-2019-0221 · Cited by 66
Al-Qaysi, N., Granić, A., Al‐Emran, M., Ramayah, T., Garces, E., & Daim, T. U. (2023) · Technology in Society · doi:10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102249 · Cited by 73
Huang, Y., Chang, L. L., & Backman, K. F. (2018) · Current Issues in Tourism · doi:10.1080/13683500.2018.1424809 · Cited by 55
Analysing public acceptance of autonomous buses based on an extended TAM model
Wu, Z., Zhou, H., Xi, H., & Wu, N. (2021) · IET Intelligent Transport Systems · doi:10.1049/itr2.12100 · Cited by 54
Examining e‐travel sites: an empirical study in Taiwan
Lin, C. (2010) · Online Information Review · doi:10.1108/14684521011036954 · Cited by 50
Ahmed, E., & Ward, R. (2016) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.043 · Cited by 60
Kraus, J., Miller, L., Klumpp, M., Babel, F., Scholz, D. D., Merger, J., & Baumann, M. R. K. (2023) · International Journal of Social Robotics · doi:10.1007/s12369-022-00952-4 · Cited by 56
Ratan, R., Earle, K., Rosenthal, S., Chen, V. H. H., Gambino, A., Goggin, G. M., Stevens, H., Li, B. J., & Lee, K. M. (2021) · Computers in Human Behavior Reports · doi:10.1016/j.chbr.2021.100076 · Cited by 51
E-commerce acceptance in the dimension of sustainability
Haryanti, T., & Subriadi, A. P. (2021) · Journal of Modelling in Management · doi:10.1108/jm2-05-2020-0141 · Cited by 60
Unveiling the Value Creation Process of Electronic Human Resource Management
Wahyudi, E., & Park, S. M. (2014) · Public Personnel Management · doi:10.1177/0091026013517555 · Cited by 52
Modelling Tourists’ Acceptance of Hotel Experience-Enhancement Smart Technologies
Han, D., Hou, H. C., Wu, H., & Lai, J. H. K. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su13084462 · Cited by 44
Ismail, H. A. (2016) · Jurnal Dinamika Manajemen · doi:10.15294/jdm.v7i1.5748 · Cited by 49
Laugesen, J., & Hassanein, K. (2016) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.09.054 · Cited by 40
Whittle, C., Jones, C. R., & While, A. H. (2020) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111343 · Cited by 43
Chu, A. Z.-C., & Chu, R. J. (2011) · The International Journal of Human Resource Management · doi:10.1080/09585192.2011.556795 · Cited by 38
Tourists’ Adoption of Extended Reality Technologies: A MetaAnalytical Structural Equation Modeling
Guo, Q., Zhu, D., Li, F. S., Wang, X., & Shu, Y. (2022) · Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research · doi:10.1177/10963480221108906 · Cited by 37
Predicting Consumer Behavior: An Extension of Technology Acceptance Model
Galib, M. H., Hammou, K. A., & steiger, J. (2018) · International Journal of Marketing Studies · doi:10.5539/ijms.v10n3p73 · Cited by 39
Holden, R. J., Brown, R., Scanlon, M. C., & Karsh, B. (2012) · Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy · doi:10.1016/j.sapharm.2012.01.004 · Cited by 37
Schaap, G., Bosse, T., & Vettehen, P. H. (2023) · AI & Society · doi:10.1007/s00146-023-01649-6 · Cited by 46
Chen, X., Tao, D., & Zhou, Z. (2018) · Behaviour and Information Technology · doi:10.1080/0144929x.2018.1515985 · Cited by 36
Cheng, M., & Yuen, A. H. K. (2020) · Behaviour and Information Technology · doi:10.1080/0144929x.2020.1811378 · Cited by 38
Schoonenboom, J. (2012) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.06.009 · Cited by 36
Luciani, B., Braghin, F., Pedrocchi, A., & Gandolla, M. (2023) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s23031721 · Cited by 35
Psychological traits and loyalty intentions towards e-Government services
Doong, H., Wang, H.-C., & Foxall, G. R. (2010) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2010.01.007 · Cited by 35
Self-citationGreen, A. J., Chang, W., Tanford, S., & Moll, L. (2015) · Journal of Teaching in Travel & Tourism · doi:10.1080/15313220.2014.999738 · Cited by 35
Bošnjak, M., Metzger, G., & Gräf, L. (2009) · Social Science Computer Review · doi:10.1177/0894439309353395 · Cited by 33
Behavioral Intention to Use IoT Technology in Healthcare Settings
Alanazi, M. H., & Soh, B. (2019) · Engineering Technology & Applied Science Research · doi:10.48084/etasr.3063 · Cited by 33
Le modèle d’acceptation des technologies depuis 1986 : 30 ans de développement
Atarodi, S., Berardi, A.-M., & Toniolo, A.-M. (2018) · Psychologie du Travail et des Organisations · doi:10.1016/j.pto.2018.08.001 · Cited by 32
Alaulamie, A. A. (2013) · University of Bedfordshire Repository (University of Bedfordshire) · Cited by 32
Burgess, K. A., Atkinson, K. M., Westeinde, J., Crowcroft, N. S., Deeks, S. L., & Wilson, K. R. (2016) · Journal of Public Health · doi:10.1093/pubmed/fdw032 · Cited by 31
The mediating impact of demonetisation on customer acceptance for IT-enabled banking services
Nagdev, K., Rajesh, A., & Misra, R. (2019) · International Journal of Emerging Markets · doi:10.1108/ijoem-05-2018-0263 · Cited by 31
Al-Qaysi, N., Nordin, N. M., & Al‐Emran, M. (2020) · Studies in systems, decision and control · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-47411-9_31 · Cited by 33
Metadata
- Authors
- Yousafzai, S. Y., Foxall, G. R., & Pallister, J. G.
- Affiliations
- Cardiff University (GB)
- Venue
- Journal of Modelling in Management
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2007-11-06
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 281-304
- ISSN
- 1746-5664 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2915538221
- Cited by
- 257
- References
- 51
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 9.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Modelling in Management (publishedVersion)
- ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Technology in Education
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Information Systems Theories and Implementation
- Keywords
- technology acceptance model, perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, user intention, user attitudes
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review