Cited by 54Consumer Behavior and Marketing InfluenceConsumer Behavior and Market DynamicsConsumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification

Children as agents of secondary socialisation for their parents

Open access
Watne, Torgeir, Lobo, Antonio, Brennan, Linda·2011·Young Consumers

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to contribute to the body of knowledge associated with consumer socialisation. The authors investigate how children function as socialisation agents for their parents in influencing their purchase intentions of computer and high‐tech products – essentially the idea of the young educating the old. Design/methodology/approach: A review of the extant literature relating to consumer socialisation, social power and knowledge about computer related and small high‐tech products yielded meaningful hypotheses. A structured survey which was required to be completed by dyads (i.e. children and parents) was mailed to Australian families in the state of Victoria. Data obtained from 180 usable responses from the dyads were analysed to test the hypotheses. Findings: Children are seen to possess expert power over their parents with regards to computer related and small high‐tech products; which make them an important agent of secondary socialisation for their parents. Men are perceived as being more knowledgeable than women, a phenomenon which leads mothers to be more inclined to seek their children's (son's in particular) advice. Research limitations/implications: This study implies that when children are seen as experts by their parents, they become important agents of secondary socialisation. However, this only relates to the consumption of the product categories studied here. Future research needs to include other product categories in order to assess the validity of the measures. Practical implications: Marketers of computer related and small high‐tech products can benefit from the findings when promoting these products to children and parents. Originality/value: This research study is unique in Australia and possibly globally.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/17473611111185841

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Watne, T., Lobo, A., & Brennan, L.
Affiliations
  • Swinburne University of Technology (AU)
  • RMIT University (AU)
Venue
Young Consumers
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2011-11-22
Volume
12
Issue
4
Pages
285-294
ISSN
1747-3616 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1996032372
Cited by
54
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 9 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2
FWCI
5.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Young Consumers Insight and Ideas for Responsible Marketers (publishedVersion)
  • Swinburne figshare (Swinburne University of Technology) (acceptedVersion)
  • Victoria University Research Repository (Victoria University) (submittedVersion)
  • RMIT Research Repository (RMIT University Library) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion)
  • Swinburne figshare (Swinburne University of Technology)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Behavior and Marketing Influence
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Consumer Behavior and Market Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification
Keywords
consumer socialization, parent-child dyads, expert power, purchase intention, computer products, high-tech products, gender differences in knowledge

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review