Cited by 38Workplace Health and Well-beingOccupational Health and Safety in WorkplacesSchool Health and Nursing Education

Determinants of employee participation in workplace health promotion

Nöhammer, Elisabeth, Schusterschitz, Claudia, Stummer, Harald·2010·International Journal of Workplace Health Management

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of the present paper is to gain a first insight into the determinants of employee acceptance of, and participation in, workplace health promotion (WHP) in the German speaking part of Europe with a focus on Austria. Design/methodology/approach Being a neglected field of research so far, a qualitative approach using problem‐centred interviews was chosen. These were conducted with 19 employees in three different organizations, the four people there responsible for WHP as well as with nine health experts. These interviews form the basis for preliminary propositions. Findings Determinants of employee acceptance of, and participation in, WHP are shown to concern information plus offer design. As for information, crucial factors are its flow, how it is presented and how it is received by the individual. Criteria regarding offer design are found on the individual and interpersonal level as well as referring to general environmental and organizational conditions. Research limitations/implications Further research on a broad quantitative level is required to test the propositions developed on the basis of the present qualitative study. Practical implications With their implications regarding information and offer design, the findings of the study can serve as a guideline for employee‐centred WHP and are of interest to practitioners as well as academics in the field. Originality/value Giving first insights into the employees' perspective regarding determinants of acc…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/17538351011055005

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Personalisation is a reported desire of users of nontechnical WHP interventions.

    “Furthermore, app users and employers appreciate the possibility of adjusting and personalising mobile apps to suit a user’s preferences and needs, as well as workplace requirements [9, 32, 35, 42, 47, 48, 51, 53, 54]–a reported desire of users of nontechnical WHP interventions [69, 72].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 31 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nöhammer, E., Schusterschitz, C., & Stummer, H.
Affiliations
UMIT TIROL - Private University for Health Sciences and Health Technology (AT)
Venue
International Journal of Workplace Health Management
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2010-06-29
Volume
3
Issue
2
Pages
97-110
ISSN
1753-8351 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2043682322
Cited by
38
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
FWCI
4.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Journal of Workplace Health Management (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Workplace Health and Well-being
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Health and Safety in Workplaces
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › School Health and Nursing Education
Keywords
workplace health promotion, employee participation, employee acceptance, determinants of participation, staff perspectives, organizational conditions, Austria

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review