Cited by 108Workplace Health and Well-beingOccupational Health and Safety in WorkplacesHealth Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention

Participation in Workplace Health Promotion Programs: The Contribution of Health and Organizational Factors

Sloan, Richard P., Gruman, Jessie C.·1988·Health Education Quarterly

Abstract

Interest in workplace health promotion programs has raised important questions regarding these programs' ability to attract participants. Typically, participation has been examined as a function of personal characteristics of employees. But participa tion in a workplace health promotion program may be influenced as much by organi zational characteristics as by health-related characteristics of employees. This prelimin ary study, conducted at AT&T Communications, used path analysis, a statistical technique for controlling for the effects of causally prior variables, to develop a model of participation. The influence of three sets of factors was detected: (1) Sex of em ployee was significant, with women more likely than men to participate in the pro gram, (2) Increased perceived risk of illness led to decreased health satisfaction which in turn led to increased intention to change health habits culminating in increased participation, and (3) The organizational climate factor of perceived supportiveness of the supervisor contributed to participation. While several potential limitations require that these findings be replicated and extended, the study suggests that developers of workplace health promotion programs should attend to organizational work climate as well as personal health characteristics of employees in an effort to increase program impact.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/109019818801500303

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sloan, R. P., & Gruman, J. C.
Affiliations
  • Columbia University Irving Medical Center (US)
  • American Cancer Society (US)
Venue
Health Education Quarterly
Published
1988-09
Volume
15
Issue
3
Pages
269-288
ISSN
0195-8402 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2169211581
Cited by
108
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
25.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Health Education Quarterly (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Workplace Health and Well-being
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Health and Safety in Workplaces
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Health Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention
Keywords
workplace health promotion, program participation, organizational climate, health satisfaction, supervisor support, sex differences
MeSH terms
Adult, Attitude to Health, Community Participation, Female, Health Promotion, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Motivation, Occupational Health Services, Organization and Administration, Organizational Culture

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review