The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A new conceptualization of service innovation grounded in S‐D logic and service systems
Open accessAbstract
Purpose: The aim of this paper is to conceptualize service innovation through a service‐dominant logic (S‐D logic) lens and a service system foundation. Design/methodology/approach: This conceptual paper offers a service‐dominant logic lens and a structuration theory approach emphasizing an actor perspective on service innovation. Since the value of innovation unfolds in practice, this paper will use customer to denote the key actor in co‐creating value in context. Findings: The paper shows how a resource constellation in a service system is reconfigured and thus explains service innovation from the lens of S‐D logic, emphasizing customers' value co‐creation of value in practices. The focus is on the interdependencies between the configuration of resources in a service system and schemas that shape customers and other actors when integrating resources and co‐creating value. Research limitations/implications: There is a need to discuss service innovation in a social constructivist view to better understand the guiding principles or schemas that enable actors to co‐create value. Originality/value: Service innovation is understood as sourced by changes in either resources or schemas (norms and rules) or a combination, resulting in structural changes in a service system. The conceptualization provides: a new definition of service innovation; a new framework describing the interdependency between changes in resources and schemas as a basis for an innovative configuration or reconfiguration of a service system; and three propositions illustrating the relevance of this new framework.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Evolving to a New Dominant Logic for Marketing
Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2004) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jmkg.68.1.1.24036 · Cited by 14,779
Service-dominant logic: continuing the evolution
Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2008) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-007-0069-6 · Cited by 7,824
Orlikowski, W. J. (2000) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.11.4.404.14600 · Cited by 4,760
Cited by
Archetypes of Service Innovation: Implications for Value Cocreation
Helkkula, A., Kowalkowski, C., & Tronvoll, B. (2018) · Journal of Service Research · doi:10.1177/1094670517746776 · Cited by 224
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Edvardsson, B., & Tronvoll, B.
- Venue
- International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2013-03-22
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 19-31
- ISSN
- 1756-669X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2062285250
- Cited by
- 176
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 31.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A new conceptualization of service innovation grounded in S‐D logic and service systems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/17566691311316220
- The paper
- Edvardsson, B., & Tronvoll, B. (2013). A new conceptualization of service innovation grounded in S‐D logic and service systems. International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1108/17566691311316220
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.