Cited by 14Digital Marketing and Social MediaConsumer Behavior and Marketing InfluenceConsumer Market Behavior and Pricing

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 67 of the 67 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Do nonlinear and interactive effects exist in live-streaming sellers’ disclosure of two-sided product information on consumers’ trust and purchase intention?

Jia, Minjiang·2024·Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics

Abstract

Purpose: This study examines the inverted U-shaped relationship between a live-streaming seller’s disclosure of two-sided product information and consumers’ trust in the seller and product. It also explores the interaction between these two types of information disclosure and their impact on purchase intention in the live-streaming sales context. Design/methodology/approach: An e-questionnaire survey was conducted in China, followed by multiple regression and structural equation modeling analyses. Findings: The disclosure of both negative and positive product information is positively correlated with consumers’ trust in the seller or product but does not directly affect their purchase intention. Negative information disclosure neither enhances nor diminishes the positive impact of disclosing positive information on consumer trust. Practical implications: Live-streaming sellers (i.e. retailers or manufacturers) should disclose both positive and negative product information to form consumers’ trust toward them (or products) and enhance sales. Social implications: Live-streaming sellers often worry about the negative effects of excessive promotions or disclosure of positive or negative product information. However, these negative effects were not statistically significant. Originality/value: Since some researchers have found nonlinear effects of two-sided product information in other contexts, this study is the first to focus on the impact of live-streaming sellers’ disclosure of two-sided product information on consumers’ trust in the live-streaming sales context rather than on the information per se.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/apjml-01-2024-0101

Cites

67 of 67 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Hair, 2017, A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM)

Metadata

Authors
Jia, M.
Affiliations
Chengdu University , ,
Venue
Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2024-05-07
Volume
36
Issue
11
Pages
2889-2906
ISSN
  • 1355-5855 (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-4248
OpenAlex
W4396689893
Cited by
13
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3
FWCI
9.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Digital Marketing and Social Media
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Behavior and Marketing Influence
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing
Keywords
live streaming sales, seller trust, product trust, purchase intention, nonlinear effects, inverted U-shaped relationship, information disclosure, consumer trust

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review