Cited by 58Efficiency Analysis Using DEAHealthcare Quality and ManagementHealthcare Operations and Scheduling Optimization

Measuring the operational and financial efficiency using a Malmquist data envelopment analysis: a case of Egyptian hospitals

Habib, Ahmed Mohamed, Shahwan, Tamer Mohamed·2020·Benchmarking: An International Journal

Abstract

Purpose: The efficient use of organizational resources is integral to the existence of prime firms. This study, using Malmquist data envelopment analysis (DEA), aims to assess in the level of operational and financial efficiency and its determinants for ensuring and sustaining excellent performance in 33 Egyptian private hospitals. Design/methodology/approach: This study adopted a Malmquist DEA approach to assess the changes in operational and financial efficiency in Egyptian hospitals. Tobit regression was also used to identify the significant variables affecting their efficiency. In addition, a sensitivity analysis is carried out for model validations. Findings: Out of 33 hospitals, 17 were found inefficient due to the decline in their technical efficiency. Moreover, the total value of the software programs and operational expenses and the total number of employees are common factors affecting both operational and financial efficiency. In addition, the number of physicians significantly affects the hospital's financial efficiency. Practical implications: The study sheds light on the value of using DEA to assess efficiency. DEA in the context of emerging economy such as Egypt's can be a useful tool for decision-makers and practitioners in identifying and addressing performance weaknesses and thus supports continuous improvement in performance. Originality/value: Several studies have adopted the DEA approach to assess the overall efficiency of hospitals in Europe and the United States. However, in the MENA region, these studies are uncommon. This study is thought to be one of the earliest attempts to assess hospitals' efficiency in Egypt.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/bij-01-2020-0041

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 46 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Habib, A. M., & Shahwan, T. M.
Affiliations
Zagazig University (EG)
Venue
Benchmarking: An International Journal
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2020-07-19
Volume
27
Issue
9
Pages
2521-2536
ISSN
1463-5771 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3045331685
Cited by
58
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4
FWCI
4.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Benchmarking An International Journal (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Efficiency Analysis Using DEA
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Healthcare Quality and Management
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Healthcare Operations and Scheduling Optimization
Keywords
hospital efficiency, operational efficiency, financial efficiency, Malmquist productivity index, private hospitals, Egyptian hospitals, technical efficiency, determinants of efficiency, physician workforce, operating costs, emerging markets

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review