Cited by 74English Language Learning and TeachingEducational Technology in LearningEducational Technology and E-Learning

The use of social networking and learning management systems in English language teaching in higher education

Dogoriti, Evriklea, Pange, Jenny, S. Anderson, Gregory·2014·Campus-Wide Information Systems

Abstract

Purpose – The use of web-enhanced teaching of the English as a foreign language in higher education in Greece is addressed in this case study which examines the student's perceptions of online instruction using Moodle as a learning management system (LMS), with and without the use of Facebook (FB) as an adjunctive learning platform. The merging of this collaborative and interactive social platform with a LMS is explored, examining the attitudes of higher education foreign language learners toward Moodle as a LMS, and FB as an adjunctive informal learning environment. The paper aims to discuss these issues. Design/methodology/approach – Results are drawn from a pre-FB questionnaire after a term using Moodle only, and a post-FB questionnaire following a term using Moodle and FB. Findings – Results suggest that the use of web-based tools and social media changed the way students viewed the role of internet technology in the development of their English language learning. Most students (76 percent) agreed that the addition of FB to the course helped build a sense of community within a learning environment, while 69 percent suggested it enhanced the learning process. Originality/value – Results suggest FB may reinforce communication skills and engagement in the learning process and may support participation and collaborative learning in the formal learning environment provided by Moodle.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/cwis-11-2013-0062

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 29 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dogoriti, E., Pange, J., & S. Anderson, G.
Affiliations
University of Ioannina (GR)
Venue
Campus-Wide Information Systems
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2014-07-29
Volume
31
Issue
4
Pages
254-263
ISSN
1065-0741 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1986602634
Cited by
74
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1
FWCI
8.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Campus-Wide Information Systems (publishedVersion)
  • Arca (British Columbia Electronic Library Network) (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › English Language Learning and Teaching
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Educational Technology in Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Educational Technology and E-Learning
Keywords
social networking, virtual learning environments, Moodle, Facebook, English as a foreign language, student perceptions, online instruction, cooperative learning, sense of community, student engagement, communication skills, higher education, Greece

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review