Cited by 72scientometrics and bibliometrics researchWeb visibility and informetricsPsychology Research and Bibliometrics

POWER LAW RELATIONS IN SCIENCE BIBLIOGRAPHY—A SELF‐CONSISTENT INTERPRETATION

NARANAN, S.·1971·Journal of Documentation

Abstract

Abstract Several power law relations are found to occur in bibliographic studies of scientific journals, articles, and citations. These can be interpreted in a self‐consistent manner in terms of growth parameters of articles, journals, and citations. Similar models have been proposed earlier in physical, biological, and behavioural sciences.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/eb026510

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Empirical studies have shown that distributions of article citations are very skewed, even within single disciplines.

    “The use of relative indicators is widespread, but empirical studies [19, 20, 21] have shown that distributions of article citations are very skewed, even within single disciplines.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
NARANAN, S.
Affiliations
Tata Institute of Fundamental Research (IN)
Corresponding author
NARANAN, S.
Venue
Journal of Documentation
Publisher
Emerald
Published
1971-02
Volume
27
Issue
2
Pages
83-97
ISSN
0022-0418 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1981342820
Cited by
72
References
21
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
3.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Documentation (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › scientometrics and bibliometrics research
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Web visibility and informetrics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychology Research and Bibliometrics
Keywords
power-law relationship, scientific journals, scientific articles, citation analysis, bibliometric analysis, growth parameters

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review