Digital job resources, digital engagement, digital leadership, and innovative work behaviour: a serial mediation model
Open accessAbstract
Purpose: Drawing on the Job Demands-Resources (JD-R) theory, the primary goal of this study is to conceptualise and empirically validate a theoretical framework that explains the process by which digital job resources influence the innovative work behaviour of technological professionals. Specifically, this study aims to examine the impact of digital job resources, especially digital training, and digital communication, on employee digital engagement. Furthermore, it investigates the influence of digital engagement on digital leadership and the effect of digital leadership on innovative work behaviour. Lastly, the study examines whether digital engagement and digital leadership serially mediate the relationship between digital job resources and innovative work behaviour. Design/methodology/approach: Data were collected from full-time technological professionals using multiple sampling techniques. A total of 307 samples were utilised for the final data analysis. Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modelling (PLS-SEM), employing SmartPLS 4.0, was used to test the study hypotheses. Findings: The findings of this study emphasize that digital engagement and digital leadership are pivotal in mediating the impact of digital communication on technological professionals' innovative work behaviour. Specifically, our results show that digital communication significantly shapes the digital engagement of these professionals. Digital engagement, in turn, positively influences digital leadership, which then fosters technological professionals’ innovative work behaviour. Notably, both digital engagement and digital leadership serve as mechanisms that link digital communication and innovative work behaviour. Contrary to our initial expectations, the study finds that digital training neither directly affects digital engagement nor has an indirect effect on innovative work behaviour. Originality/value: The present study is distinct in offering a theoretical framework outlining the steps through which digital resources influence technological professionals' digital engagement, digital leadership capabilities, and their innovative work behaviour. Prior studies have predominantly focused on antecedents of innovative work behaviour, with an emphasis on individual characteristics and organisational environmental factors. There is limited research exploring how, or even if, digital job resources – such as digital training and digital communication – affect employees’ innovative work behaviour. Additionally, the examination of the interrelationship between digital engagement and digital leadership is notably lacking in existing literature. Much of the research has instead probed the converse relationship: how leadership styles impact employees' engagement. Lastly, this research is among the pioneering efforts to consider the serial mediating role of digital engagement and digital leadership between digital job resources and innovative work behaviour, a topic that remains underrepresented in academic discourse. This study addresses these gaps.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Digital leadership substantially influences innovative work behavior.
“Recent research by Ahmed et al. (2024), Al-Ayed (2024), and Zia et al. (2025) indicates that digital leadership substantially influences IWB.”
From Evoking teachers' innovative work behavior: Perspective of digital leadership, creativity, and proactive personality through work engagement (2025) · cites this paper as Zia et al., 2025
Cites
Job Demands—Resources theory and self-regulation: New explanations and remedies for job burnout
Bakker, A. B., & de Vries, J. D. (2021) · Anxiety, Stress, & Coping · doi:10.1080/10615806.2020.1797695 · Cited by 1,131 · see citing works
Common method bias in applied settings: The dilemma of researching in organizations
Jordan, P. J., & Troth, A. C. (2020) · Australian Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0312896219871976 · Cited by 997 · see citing works
The digital workplace and its dark side: An integrative review
Marsh, E., Vallejos, E. P., & Spence, A. (2022) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2021.107118 · Cited by 348 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Siregar, J., Widodo, W., Permana, R., Sriyono, H., & Saputro, A. (2025) · European Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.12973/eu-jer.15.1.323 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Ding, N., Chen, M., & Hu, L. (2025) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105650 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
- Authors
- Zia, A., Memon, M. A., Mirza, M. Z., Iqbal, Y. M. J., & Tariq, A.
- Affiliations
- National University of Sciences and Technology (PK)
- Chandigarh University (IN)
- New Uzbekistan University (UZ)
- Lappeenranta-Lahti University of Technology (FI)
- Venue
- European Journal of Innovation Management
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2024-08-09
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 3192-3216
- ISSN
- 1460-1060 (ISSN-L)
- 1758-7115
- OpenAlex
- W4401434239
- Cited by
- 54
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 31 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 2
- FWCI
- 27.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- lutpub.lut.fi
- Licence
- cc-by-nc
- Locations
- European Journal of Innovation Management (publishedVersion)
- LUTPub (LUT University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Corporate Management and Leadership
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Employer Branding and e-HRM
- Keywords
- digital engagement, digital leadership, innovative behavior, digital communication, digital training, job demands-resources model, serial mediation, employee innovation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review