The DOI matches its Crossref record; 42 of the 42 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Fifty years of the European Journal of Marketing: a bibliometric analysis
Abstract
Purpose: The European Journal of Marketing was created in 1967. In 2017, the journal celebrates its 50th anniversary. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to present a bibliometric overview of the leading trends of the journal during this period. Design/methodology/approach: This work uses the Scopus database to analyse the most productive authors, institutions and countries, as well as the most cited papers and the citing articles. The investigation uses bibliometric indicators to represent the bibliographic data, including the total number of publications and citations between 1967 and 2017. Additionally, the article also develops a graphical visualization of the bibliographic material by using the visualization of similarities viewer software to map journals, keywords and institutions with bibliographic coupling and co-citation analysis. Findings: British authors and institutions are the most productive in the journal, although Australians’ are growing significantly the number of papers published. Continental European institutions are also increasing the number of publications, but they are still far from reaching the British contribution so far. In the mid-term, however, these zone’s authors and institutions, especially those from big European countries like France, Germany, Italy and Spain, should reach a closer performance to British ones; more as less long, historic, but more recent periods of analysis are considered. Practical implications: This article is useful for any reader of this journal to understand questions such as papers’ European Journal of Marketing-related scientific productivity in terms of, for instance, contributors/authors, institutions and countries, or the main sources used to back them. Originality/value: This is the first comprehensive article offering a general overview of the leading trends and researchers of the journal over its history.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping
van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3 · Cited by 21,484
An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output
Hirsch, J. E. (2005) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0507655102 · Cited by 11,669
Co‐citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents
Small, H. (1973) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science · doi:10.1002/asi.4630240406 · Cited by 5,345
Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics
Pritchard, A. E. (1969) · Journal of Documentation · Cited by 3,298
Science mapping software tools: Review, analysis, and cooperative study among tools
Cobo, M. J., López-Herrera, A. G., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Herrera, F. (2011) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.21525 · Cited by 3,242
Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers
Kessler, M. M. (1963) · American Documentation · doi:10.1002/asi.5090140103 · Cited by 2,855
The journal of financial economics
Schwert, G. W. (1993) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/0304-405x(93)90012-z · Cited by 2,542
Citation Indexes for Science: A New Dimension in Documentation through Association of Ideas
Garfield, E. (1955) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.122.3159.108 · Cited by 2,334
Toward a definition of “bibliometrics”
Broadus, R. N. (1987) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/bf02016680 · Cited by 1,646
Ramos‐Rodríguez, A., & Ruíz‐Navarro, J. (2004) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.397 · Cited by 1,626
Cited by
Knowledge management: A global examination based on bibliometric analysis
Gaviria-Marin, M., Merigó, J. M., & Baier-Fuentes, H. (2019) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2018.07.006 · Cited by 560
Self-citationTwenty years of the Journal of Knowledge Management: a bibliometric analysis
Gaviria-Marin, M., Merigo, J. M., & Popa, S. (2018) · Journal of Knowledge Management · doi:10.1108/jkm-10-2017-0497 · Cited by 346
Exploring Topics in Bibliometric Research Through Citation Networks and Semantic Analysis
Mejia, C., Wu, M., Zhang, Y., & Kajikawa, Y. (2021) · Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics · doi:10.3389/frma.2021.742311 · Cited by 316
Blockchain applications in management: A bibliometric analysis and literature review
Tandon, A., Kaur, P., Mäntymäki, M., & Dhir, A. (2021) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120649 · Cited by 312
Thirty years of research in family business journals: Status quo and future directions
Rovelli, P., Ferasso, M., De Massis, A., & Kraus, S. (2022) · Journal of Family Business Strategy · doi:10.1016/j.jfbs.2021.100422 · Cited by 283
Metadata
- Authors
- Martínez-López, F. J., Merigó, J. M., Valenzuela-Fernández, L., & Nicolás, C.
- Venue
- European Journal of Marketing
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2018-02-12
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 1/2
- Pages
- 439-468
- ISSN
- 0309-0566 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2785537869
- Cited by
- 572
- References
- 42
- FWCI
- 37.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fifty years of the European Journal of Marketing: a bibliometric analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/ejm-11-2017-0853
- The paper
- Martínez-López, F. J., Merigó, J. M., Valenzuela-Fernández, L., & Nicolás, C. (2018). Fifty years of the European Journal of Marketing: a bibliometric analysis. European Journal of Marketing. https://doi.org/10.1108/ejm-11-2017-0853
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.