Cited by 1Employment, Labor, and Gender StudiesWork-Family Balance ChallengesLabor Law and Work Dynamics

Working-time reduction: from a weekly working-time reduction to a reduction of weekly working days?

Open access
Boulin, Jean-Yves·2026·Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research

Abstract

Summary: Successive issues have shaped policies aimed at reducing working time since the mid-19th century, all of which led to the gradual construction of a standard working time, achieved during the post-Second World War period. With the rise in the 1980s onwards of non-standard hours and processes of work intensification and densification, this previously achieved standard was progressively destabilised, having harmful effects on workers’ health and well-being in a context marked by the growth of dual-earner couples and single-parent families. The Covid-19 pandemic exacerbated these difficulties, prompting many to question the place of work and to reassess the balance of various life domains. Against this backdrop, four-day-week trials were launched in several countries worldwide, yielding positive results for both employees and businesses. In revisiting the emergent conditions of the four-day week, we consider the main impacts and question the limits and overall scope of this approach to reducing working time.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/10242589261466069

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. Åkerstedt T, Olsson B, Ingre M et al. (2001) A 6-hour working day-effects on health and well-being. Human Ergology Society 30(1-2): 197-202.
  2. Boulin JY (2024) Working Time Reduction with a Focus on the Four-Day Week: A Literature Review. Eurofound.
  3. Coote A, Harper A and Stirling A (2021) The Case for a Four-Day Week. Polity Press.
  4. Erhel C and Palier B (2025) Travailler mieux. PUF. Eurofound (2012) 5th European Working Conditions Survey: Overview Report. Publications Office of the European Union. Luxembourg. Available at: https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2806/34660 (accessed 1 June 2026). · DOI
  5. Eurofound (2017). 6th European Working Conditions Survey: 2017 Update. Publications Office of the European Union. Luxembourg. Available at: https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2806/784968 (accessed 1 June 2026). · DOI
  6. Eurofound (2022) Working Conditions in the Time of COVID-19: Implications for the Future. European Working Conditions Telephone Survey 2021 series. Publications Office of the European Union. Luxembourg. Available at: https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2806/357794 (accessed 1 June 2026). · DOI
  7. Golden L (2010) A purpose for every time? The timing and length of the work week and implications for worker well-being. Connecticut Law Review 42(4): 53-74.
  8. Gomes P (2021) Friday Is the New Saturday: How a Four-Day Working Week Will Save the Economy. FLINT, an imprint of The History Press.
  9. Grosse R (2018) The Four Day Work Week. Routledge.
  10. Hairline C (2007) Sunday. A History of the First Day from Babylonia to Super Bowl. Yale University Press.
  11. Handbury H, Illien P, Ming E et al. (2023) Working less for more? A systematic review of the social, eco- nomic, and ecological effects of working time reduction policies in the global North. Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy 19(1): 2222595.
  12. McCrossen A (2000) Holy Day, Holiday. The American Sunday, Cornell University Press.
  13. O'Connor J and Lindzon J (2026) Do More in Four. Why It's Time for a Shorter Workweek. Harvard Business Press.
  14. Pang ASK (2023) Work Less, Do More: Designing the 4-Day Week. Penguin Business.
  15. Pink J, Kamerāde D and Burchell B (2024) Four-day week trial: South Cambridgeshire Council's key perfor- mance indicator evaluation. Research Report. University of Salford/University of Cambridge.
  16. Roethlisberger FJ and Dickson WJ (1939) Management and the Worker. Harvard University Press.
  17. Zerubavel E (1985) The Seven Day Circle. The History and Meaning of the Week. The University of Chicago Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Boulin, J.-Y.
Affiliations
Université Paris Sciences et Lettres (FR)
Corresponding author
Boulin, Jean-Yves
Venue
Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research
Published
2026-09-21
ISSN
  • 1024-2589 (ISSN-L)
  • 1996-7284
OpenAlex
W7213910561
Cited by
1
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 1
FWCI
5.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Transfer European Review of Labour and Research (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Employment, Labor, and Gender Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Work-Family Balance Challenges
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Labor Law and Work Dynamics
Keywords
working time reduction, irregular working hours, work intensification, worker health and well-being, dual-earner couples, single-parent families, COVID-19 pandemic, work-life balance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review