Cited by 50Employer Branding and e-HRMHuman Resource and Talent ManagementGlobal and Cross-Cultural Management

Institutional determinants of e-HRM diffusion success

Burbach, Ralf, Royle, Tony·2014·Employee Relations

Abstract

Purpose: – Drawing on institutional theory and existing international business practice transfer and e-HRM models this paper develops an e-HRM diffusion model to ascertain the institutional factors that determine the successful diffusion of e-HRM practices in multinational corporations (MNC). The paper aims to discuss these issues. Design/methodology/approach: – The research is based on the analysis of 25 semi-structured interviews with 15 key stakeholders in the German and Irish subsidiaries of a single US-based MNC as well as two interviews with a senior manager in one of its main competitors. Findings: – The findings suggest that the successful transfer of e-HRM is mediated by an interchange of various institutional-level factors (external, relational, organizational and individual) within the corporation and its subsidiaries. Successful implementation of e-HRM is synonymous with the successful integration and institutionalization of e-HRM practices in the subsidiaries. Research limitations/implications: – As this analysis is founded upon a single case study, it is difficult to make assumptions concerning the broad population of all MNC and their subsidiaries. Further research may be required to test the model and the findings presented in this paper. Practical implications: – The findings and the model presented in this paper demonstrate the impact of the institutional context and of key success factors of technology implementation on e-HRM diffusion success. These findings may be of particular relevance to organizations and practitioners who are embarking on an e-HRM installation in an international context. Originality/value: – This paper enriches the e-HRM and international management debate by identifying the key institutional factors impacting the diffusion of e-HRM practices in the subsidiaries of an MNC. In addition, the model put forward in the paper shows how these factors interact and how successful e-HRM diffusion can be characterized.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/er-07-2013-0080

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Prior literature concerning technology-driven HRM considers adoption as a single point event, yet adoption is only a part of the assimilation process.

    “Moreover, prior literature concerning technology-driven HRM (i.e., HRIS, e-HRM) considers adoption as a single point event (see, e.g., Bondarouk et al., 2017a; Burbach & Royle, 2014; Troshani, Jerram & Hill, 2014), yet adoption is only a part of the assimilation process.”

    From AI-augmented HRM: Antecedents, assimilation and multilevel consequences (2023) · cites this paper as Burbach & Royle, 2014

  • Prior literature focusing on technology-driven HRM has considered TOP factors for understanding adoption, which reinforces the importance of TOP framework in identifying the antecedents of HRM (AI) assimilation in an organisation.

    “Prior literature focusing on technology-driven HRM (i.e., e-HRM, HRIS) has considered TOP factors for understanding adoption (see, e.g., Bondarouk et al., 2017a; Burbach & Royle, 2014; Strohmeier & Kabst, 2009; Troshani et al., 2014), which reinforces the importance of TOP framework in identifying the antecedents of HRM (AI) assimilation in an organisation.”

    From AI-augmented HRM: Antecedents, assimilation and multilevel consequences (2023) · cites this paper as Burbach & Royle, 2014

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Burbach, R., & Royle, T.
Affiliations
  • Dublin Institute of Technology (IE)
  • University of Bradford (GB)
Venue
Employee Relations
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2014-05-27
Volume
36
Issue
4
Pages
354-375
ISSN
0142-5455 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2021849701
Cited by
50
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1
FWCI
3.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Employee Relations (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Employer Branding and e-HRM
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Human Resource and Talent Management
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Global and Cross-Cultural Management
Keywords
e-HRM, diffusion of innovations, institutional theory, multinational corporations, subsidiaries, practice transfer, institutionalization, technology implementation, relational factors, organizational factors, international human resource management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review