The DOI matches its Crossref record.
E-tivities: The Key to Active Online Learning
Abstract
The world of learning and teaching is at a watershed; confronted by challenges to previous educational models. One learning future lies in impactful, purposeful, active online activities, or e-tivities, that keep learners engaged, motivated, and participating. Grounded in the authors action research, E-tivities, 2nd Edition assuredly illustrates how technologies shape and enhance learning and teaching journeys. In this highly practical book, Gilly Salmon maintains her exceptional reputation, delivering another powerful guide for academics, teaching professionals, trainers, designers and developers in all disciplines. This popular text has been comprehensively updated; addressing key technological changes since 2002, offering fresh case studies and Carpe Diem - a unique approach to learning design workshops.Readers will find E-tivities, 2nd Edition a wonderful resource on its own or as a companion to the authors bestselling e-Moderating, 3rd Edition.Find e-tivities on the web at e-tivities.com or connect at gillysalmon.com
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
AMEE Guide 32: e-Learning in medical education Part 1: Learning, teaching and assessment
Ellaway, R., & Masters, K. (2008) · Medical Teacher · doi:10.1080/01421590802108331 · Cited by 652
Designing online courses that effectively engage learners from diverse cultural backgrounds
Wang, M. (2007) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2006.00626.x · Cited by 230
A case study of constructivist instructional strategies for adult online learning
Ruey, S. (2010) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.00965.x · Cited by 196
Teacher Training Institute, M., Cheok, M. L., Wong, S. L., & Faculty of Educational Studies, U. P. M. (2015) · International Journal of Instruction · doi:10.12973/iji.2015.816a · Cited by 127
Facilitating Asian students' critical thinking in online discussions
Chiu, Y. J. (2009) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2008.00898.x · Cited by 104
Yeh, Y.-C. (2010) · Teaching and Teacher Education · doi:10.1016/j.tate.2010.06.014 · Cited by 73
Walsh, J. N., & Rísquez, A. (2020) · The International Journal of Management Education · doi:10.1016/j.ijme.2020.100381 · Cited by 39
Learning Needs Analysis of Collaborative E-Classes in Semi-Formal Settings: The REVIT Example
Mavroudi, A., & Hadzilacos, T. (2013) · The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning · doi:10.19173/irrodl.v14i5.1544 · Cited by 12
Dyment, J., & Downing, J. (2018) · Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education · doi:10.1080/1359866x.2018.1444140 · Cited by 10
Computing Education Research Today
Fincher, S. A., Tenenberg, J., Dorn, B., Hundhausen, C., McCartney, R., & Murphy, L. (2019) · The Cambridge Handbook of Computing Education Research · doi:10.1017/9781108654555.003 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Venue
- Education + Training
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2003-09-01
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 6
- ISSN
- 0040-0912 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1812397371
- Cited by
- 768
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 199.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.