Cited by 127Technology Adoption and User BehaviourTechnology-Enhanced Education StudiesEducational Technology and E-Learning

Predictors of E-Learning Satisfaction in Teaching and Learning for School Teachers: A Literature Review

Open access
Teacher Training Institute, Melaka, Malaysia, Janecheok88@gmail.com, Cheok, Mei Lick, Wong, Su Luan, Faculty of Educational Studies, Universiti Putra Malaysia, wsuluan@gmail.com·2015·International Journal of Instruction

Abstract

This paper develops a theoretical model of the determinants of e-learning satisfaction in teaching and learning among secondary school teachers.It is based on reviews of past studies on satisfaction in using information technology systems.Three potential groups of determinants of satisfaction among secondary school teachers were identified; user-related characteristics, organisational-related characteristics and the e-learning-system characteristics.Usage is established as a mediating variable between the three potential groups of determinants and satisfaction towards e-learning.Future research could provide a more definitive theoretical statement of e-learning satisfaction and develop an additional proposition which could be derived from a more refined theory.The research yields a theoretical framework that outlines the predictive potential of the three groups of key factors in explaining e-learning satisfaction among secondary school teachers.The factors can be considered when developing future continuous professional development courses and intervention programmes when proposing a new innovation in the curriculum.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.12973/iji.2015.816a

Cites

77 of 77 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Teachers' personal characteristics (e.g., anxiety, self-efficacy) are associated with their satisfaction and engagement with technology.

    “Cheok and Wong (2015) found that teachers’ personal characteristics (e.g., anxiety, self-efficacy) are associated with their satisfaction and engagement with technology.”

    From Impacts of digital technologies on education and factors influencing schools' digital capacity and transformation: A literature review (2023) · cites this paper as Cheok and Wong, 2015

    The User-Related Factors section identifies anxiety and self-efficacy as potential predictors of e-learning satisfaction, and the sections on each propose relationships among secondary school teachers. But this literature review proposes those relationships rather than reporting that it found them, and it does not establish an association between both characteristics and teachers’ engagement with technology. Page numbers were not supplied in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Interest has grown in varied content-delivery formats, including online, blended, and hybrid instruction.

    “Additionally, from an instructional perspective, there has been a growing interest in different modes and models of content delivery such as online, blended, and hybrid modes (e.g., Cheok & Wong, 2015; Kazu & Yalçin, 2022; Ulum, 2022).”

    From Impacts of digital technologies on education and factors influencing schools' digital capacity and transformation: A literature review (2023) · cites this paper as Cheok & Wong, 2015

    The Flexibility and E-Learning Satisfaction section discusses access to e-learning content, and the References list includes work on online and blended learning. Neither establishes growing interest in delivery formats or discusses hybrid instruction; searches for those terms and the claimed trend found no supporting passage in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. [13]13. Predictors of E-Learning Satisfaction in Teaching and Learning… International Journal of Instruction, January 2015 • Vol.8, No.
  2. [45]45. Liu, X., Magjuka, R. J., Bonk, C. J., & Lee, S. H. (2007). Does sense of community matter? Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 8(1), 9-24
  3. [48]48. Predictors of E-Learning Satisfaction in Teaching and Learning… International Journal of Instruction, January 2015 • Vol.8, No.1
  4. [54]54. K. A. Feldman (Ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  5. [73]73. Luan, W. S., & Teo, T. (2009). Investigating the Technology Acceptance among Student Teachers in Malaysia: An Application of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 18(2), 261-272
  6. [81]81. Zaharias, P. & Polymenakou, A. (2009). Developing a Usability Evaluation Method for eLearning Applications: Beyond Functional Usability, International Journal of Human Computer Interaction, 25(1), 75-98
  7. [83]83. Zhao, Y., & Bryant, F. L. (2006). Can teacher technology integration training alone lead to high levels of technology integration? A qualitative look at teachers' technology integration after state mandated technology training. Electronic Journal for the Integration of Technology in Education, 5(1), 53-62.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Teacher Training Institute, M., Cheok, M. L., Wong, S. L., & Faculty of Educational Studies, U. P. M.
Affiliations
Universiti Putra Malaysia (MY)
Venue
International Journal of Instruction
Publisher
Modestum Ltd
Published
2015-01-10
Volume
8
Issue
1
Pages
75-90
ISSN
  • 1308-1470 (ISSN-L)
  • 1694-609X
OpenAlex
W2184918733
Cited by
127
References
77
Citations by year
2025: 10 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 3
FWCI
18.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Instruction (publishedVersion)
  • Universiti Putra Malaysia Institutional Repository (Universiti Putra Malaysia) (acceptedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
  • Social Sciences › Education › Technology-Enhanced Education Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Educational Technology and E-Learning
Keywords
e-learning satisfaction, secondary school teachers, organizational characteristics, theoretical model, continuing professional development, educational innovation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review