The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Dynamics of environmental consciousness and green purchase behaviour: an empirical study
Open accessAbstract
Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to investigate the relationships between environmental consciousness (ECO), green purchase attitude (GPA), green purchase intention (GPI), perceived customer effectiveness (PCE), green behaviour (GRB) and green purchase behaviour (GPB). Based on the statistical analyses, this paper offers some further research directions to advance the extant literature. Design/methodology/approach: The theoretical model is firmly grounded in extant literature. To test the study hypotheses, the authors have developed a survey instrument following a two-stage process. The constructs were first operationalized by the authors and then pre-tested by experts. Dillman’s (2007) guidelines were then followed to gather data. Finally, the theoretical model was tested using multivariate statistical tools. Findings: Results indicate that ECO has an influence on GPA and PCE; GPA has an influence on PCE and GRB; GPI has an influence on PCE; and GRB has an influence on GPB. Environmental benefit still ranks at the sixth position among eight product-selection criteria, as is evident from qualitative in-depth interviews indicating a primarily rationalistic and not an altruistic purchase approach. The gap in translation of ECO into GB and GPB can be attributed to costliness, non-availability with less variety, lack of brand reputation of green products and budget constraints for customers. Research limitations/implications: The study faces the limitation of generalizability of the results because it was carried out in a particular state in India; it may not be the perception of the country as a whole. The bias owing to social desirability, selective memory and telescoping with the use of self-reported data could also be a limitation for the current empirical study. Originality/value: This study aimed to extend pro-environmental behaviour studies beyond developed countries and to empirically validate the models built on the theory of ECO leading to GPB, especially for India, a rising market. A novel approach to empirically discuss the situational and market factors will provide a much-needed thrust for research on these lines.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The theory of planned behavior
Ajzen, I. (1991) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-t · Cited by 90,587
Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement.
Rotter, J. B. (1966) · Psychological Monographs: General and Applied · doi:10.1037/h0092976 · Cited by 21,937
From Intentions to Actions: A Theory of Planned Behavior
Ajzen, I. (1985) · Action Control · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-69746-3_2 · Cited by 19,057
Understanding information technology usage: a test of competing models
Taylor, S., & Todd, P. A. (1995) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.6.2.144 · Cited by 8,815
Encouraging pro-environmental behaviour: An integrative review and research agenda
Steg, L., & Vlek, C. (2009) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.10.004 · Cited by 5,089
The self and social behavior in differing cultural contexts.
Triandis, H. C. (1989) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.96.3.506 · Cited by 5,019
Ouellette, J. A., & Wood, W. (1998) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.124.1.54 · Cited by 3,480
Sustainable food consumption: Exploring the consumer “attitude–behavioral intention” gap
Vermeir, I., & Verbeke, W. (2006) · Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10806-005-5485-3 · Cited by 2,524
Lower bounds on sample size in structural equation modeling
Christopher Westland, J. (2010) · Electronic Commerce Research and Applications · doi:10.1016/j.elerap.2010.07.003 · Cited by 1,846
Environmental segmentation alternatives: a look at green consumer behavior in the new millennium
Straughan, R. D., & Roberts, J. A. (1999) · Journal of Consumer Marketing · doi:10.1108/07363769910297506 · Cited by 1,611
Cited by
Kautish, P., Paul, J., & Sharma, R. (2019) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.389 · Cited by 476
Yusoff, Y. M., Omar, M. K., Kamarul Zaman, M. D., & Samad, S. (2019) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.153 · Cited by 336
Factors affecting green purchase behavior: A systematic literature review
Sharma, K., Aswal, C., & Paul, J. (2023) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.3237 · Cited by 325
The effects of consumer attitude on green purchase intention: A meta-analytic path analysis
Zaremohzzabieh, Z., Ismail, N., Ahrari, S., & Abu Samah, A. (2021) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.10.053 · Cited by 312
Shimul, A. S., Cheah, I., & Khan, B. B. (2022) · Journal of Global Marketing · doi:10.1080/08911762.2021.1934770 · Cited by 164
Metadata
- Authors
- Mishal, A., Dubey, R., Gupta, O. K., & Luo, Z.
- Venue
- International Journal of Climate Change Strategies and Management
- Publisher
- Emerald
- Published
- 2017-10-02
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 682-706
- ISSN
- 1756-8692 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2753141022
- Cited by
- 234
- References
- 15
- FWCI
- 15.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dynamics of environmental consciousness and green purchase behaviour: an empirical study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1108/ijccsm-11-2016-0168
- The paper
- Mishal, A., Dubey, R., Gupta, O. K., & Luo, Z. (2017). Dynamics of environmental consciousness and green purchase behaviour: an empirical study. International Journal of Climate Change Strategies and Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijccsm-11-2016-0168
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.