Cited by 476Environmental Sustainability in BusinessEnvironmental Education and SustainabilitySustainable Supply Chain Management

The moderating influence of environmental consciousness and recycling intentions on green purchase behavior

Kautish, Pradeep, Paul, Justin, Sharma, Rajesh·2019·Journal of Cleaner Production

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.389

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kautish, P., Paul, J., & Sharma, R.
Affiliations
  • Mody University of Science and Technology (IN)
  • Rollins College (US)
Corresponding author
Paul, Justin
Venue
Journal of Cleaner Production
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-08
Volume
228
Pages
1425-1436
ISSN
0959-6526 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2943652962
Cited by
476
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 31 · 2025: 73 · 2024: 115 · 2023: 78 · 2022: 84 · 2021: 53 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 6
FWCI
58.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Cleaner Production (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Environmental Sustainability in Business
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Environmental Education and Sustainability
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
Keywords
green purchase behavior, environmental awareness, recycling intention, moderating effect, perceived consumer effectiveness, theory of planned behavior, green marketing, emerging markets, Indian consumers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review