Cited by 10Artificial Intelligence in EducationArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationArtificial Intelligence Applications

Artificial intelligence in higher education: a PRISMA 2020 review

Jaboob, Mohammed, Al-Ansi, Abdullah M., Riyadh, Hosam Alden·2026·International Journal of Educational Management

Abstract

Purpose Artificial Intelligence (AI) is making significant inroads in higher education (HE) institutions, revolutionizing how students learn and instructors teach. With the ability to analyze vast amounts of data quickly, AI can personalize learning experiences for students based on their individual needs and learning styles. The review aims to synthesize the literature regarding opportunities, challenges and current trends of AI in HE. Design/methodology/approach The fragmented body of knowledge in AI and its adoption in HE was aggregated by conducting this PRISMA 2020 review during 2014–2024, using the Scopus database as a source for literature. Findings The research findings of 33 primary reviews relevant to the research of AI in HE mapped the main opportunities, challenges and recent trends of AI in HE during this period. Personalized learning, automated feedback and grading, enhanced accessibility and better resource allocation are features of AI opportunities, while infrastructure and internet access, HR skills and ethical concerns about data privacy and security and integrity were the most challenges of AI in HE. Results indicate the exponential increase during the last four years in AI research that reflects the huge changes and development in all aspects of education. Research limitations/implications This review has some limitations regarding the data selection and analysis. Although PRISMA 2020 guidelines were applied, inclusion and exclusion criteria included many prior kinds of research that were not in HE. Social implications The implications for higher education functions are to advocate for AI responsibility that addresses social and ethical concerns that have the potential to undermine the effective integration of AI and its opportunities and challenges. Future research should conduct empirical studies on AI and HE and its assessment and evaluation in this context. Originality/value The review advances the literature by providing the current state of AI in HE, its applications and trends, opportunities and challenges and a research agenda for future works.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/ijem-09-2024-0560

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jaboob, M., Al-Ansi, A. M., & Riyadh, H. A.
Affiliations
  • Dhofar University (OM)
  • College of Commerce and Business Administration, Dhofar University , ,
  • Curtin University (AU)
Venue
International Journal of Educational Management
Publisher
Emerald
Published
2025-05-27
Volume
40
Issue
1-2
Pages
113-132
ISSN
  • 0951-354X (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-6518
OpenAlex
W4410702531
Cited by
10
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 2
FWCI
10.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Journal of Educational Management (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence Applications
Keywords
artificial intelligence in higher education, personalized learning, automated grading, accessibility, data privacy, AI ethics, AI adoption barriers, AI in teaching and learning, research agenda

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review